The Mexicans named me Geronimo after their Saint Jerome, Francis de Geronimo, and that name was adopted by the United States of America as well.

Which is a militarized Empire that stole our native lands and was built on the backs of slaves. Their people smell of metal and smoke. Not of earth or rain.

Their country’s settler colonial founding and genocide of my people mirrors that of Israel’s current genocide of Arab peoples.

They slaughtered my family and now that their spirits had moved on I had nothing left to lose.

In a modern context, they would have called me a terrorist, as all empires invert the light into names of shadow, but in actuality, they were the shadow, the real terrorists, attacking random Apache families, to try and force me to surrender. For not giving in to their colonial expansion and for being a powerful symbol of resistance.

My people bleed on sacred stone... yet still breathe. Survival is resistance. While the tools of empire require infrastructure, indigenous simply use their generational knowledge of the land, water, wind, and animal patterns. When you know the land is a living system, you know it better than the empire hunting you, which will deplete its resources through their own hubris at the expense of their people.

During the second World War, U.S. paratroopers, rather absurdly, yelled my warrior name “Geronimo!” when jumping out of planes as a bravado-filled cry to show fearlessness.

Later, the militarized empire also took my name when killing Osama Bin Laden, a convenient label for “the elusive enemy”, which reveals how deeply the “enemy” archetype is embedded. The empire fights me, then later co-ops my name as shorthand for another enemy. As history is not merely written by the victors; it is repurposed by them.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

Now here is the key point - If the psyche is developmentally arrested, meaning emotionally immature beneath a powerful adult exterior, then the individual may unconsciously identify with the child archetype internally, and instead of integrating that inner child, they externalize it. They seek it outside themselves.

In our symbolism, The Child Archetype represents: New potential, Innocence, Vulnerability, The future, And the self in germinal form.

To harm a child is symbolically to dominate or corrupt the future — to exert total power over innocence. For someone whose ego is inflated and whose shadow is unintegrated, there can be an unconscious drive to conquer what they themselves never integrated. So the predator is often split internally into a grandiose ruler on the outside and an unresolved, emotionally stunted, child inside, and instead of healing the inner child, they literally control children in the darkest ways.

The Puer Aeternus is the eternal boy. Meaning an adult male who never mentally grew into an emotionally mature adult. In its positive form it leads to creativity, spontaneity, and vision. In its negative form it leads to irresponsibility, avoidance of maturity, entitlement, and lack of empathy. When immense wealth protects someone from consequences, the negative Puer can flourish indefinitely. There is no forced maturation. The result is emotional adolescence, sexual immaturity, and desire for control without accountability. So the child becomes both object and mirror.

When individuals avoid confronting their shadow, they project it outward. This is power as a “Defense Against the Shadow”. But projection alone is not enough for a powerful person. When someone has wealth, and protection, and social insulation, they don’t just fantasize shadow impulses — they enact them. In this sense, abuse becomes the behavioral manifestation of an unintegrated psyche combined with structural immunity.

There is also a darker archetype at work - the Devouring Father. This is authority that consumes rather than protects the young. Psychologically, it appears when authority becomes self-serving, and the elder generation exploits the younger, and civilization sacrifices its future for its appetites. In myth, this is Kronos devouring his children and is more archetypal regression than occult ritual.

Now we must widen the lens to collective shadow. When a culture denies its shadow, such as with greed, exploitation, obsession with power, that shadow gathers in Epstein class individuals. They become carriers of the collective pathology. The outrage society feels is real — but often mixed with projection. We prefer to imagine monsters rather than admit structural rot. The insight is unsettling because these individuals are of course not demons but are extreme expressions of unintegrated drives that exist within the collective psyche.

The deeper teaching here is about what happens when ego outgrows conscience, and when inner development does not match outer power, and when the shadow is indulged rather than integrated?

The psyche does not tolerate imbalance indefinitely. When shadow merges with power, innocence suffers.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

Firstly - Power Without Initiation Becomes Predatory

In the Mystery traditions, power is never meant to be separated from inner development. When an individual gains immense material power without undergoing ethical and spiritual refinement, the personality becomes hypertrophied.

The ego expands, but the soul does not.

In such cases, people begin to test boundaries. The ordinary no longer stimulates them. They begin seeking extremes — because power without inner grounding becomes a drug. Children represent vulnerability, innocence, and power imbalance. For a corrupted psyche, domination becomes intoxicating.

This is not mystical — it is psychological and spiritual pathology amplified by wealth and immunity.

Secondly - The Inversion of the Sacred

Across esoteric traditions, the child symbolizes: Purity of potential, the unconditioned soul, and a divine spark not yet calcified by the world

To harm a child is symbolically to attack innocence itself.

In occult philosophy, there is a concept of inversion — the deliberate corruption of what is sacred. When individuals become spiritually inverted, they derive stimulation not from creation but from violation.

The “black magician,” in classical esoteric language, is not someone with spooky powers. It is someone who uses intelligence and will divorced from conscience.

Such people often become fascinated with taboo because taboo represents transgression of cosmic law.

Third - Extreme Morbid Wealth Creates Psychological Isolation

There is another, less dramatic but equally powerful factor.

When individuals live in environments where: There are no consequences, Everyone is dependent on them, and they are insulated from ordinary human feedback, their empathy atrophies.

Esoterically speaking, empathy is a function of the heart center. If the heart center is undeveloped and the will center is hyperdeveloped, you get cold dominance.

Children become targets not as much because of ritual mysticism, but because they are defenseless and controllable. Predators seek asymmetry.

Fourthly - The Shadow of Civilization

Jungian esotericism would say something deeper still: When a society suppresses its shadow — its greed, lust for power, exploitation — that shadow accumulates in the elite strata where power concentrates.

The Epstein phenomenon is less about secret occult cults and more about: Moral decay enabled by power, Systemic protection of predators, and collective denial

When institutions protect abusers, the abuse metastasizes.

Lastly - A Sort of Supernatural Motive is a Further Conversation

Well speak again at a later time regarding the idea of elite abuse networks operating for occult energy harvesting, ritual power, or mystical purposes. Whether fully or just partially untrue, that narrative tends to distract from the real issue: which is simple exploitation enabled by wealth and complicity.

At a true esoteric level, this phenomenon represents: Power severed from conscience, Intelligence severed from wisdom, and will severed from compassion

And whenever those separations occur — whether in a king, a corporation, or an individual — innocence becomes endangered.

The mystery traditions teach that real initiation requires greater responsibility as one gains power. When that law is ignored, degeneration follows.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

I’ve spent a lifetime fighting for equal rights under the law, and know when the Fourth Amendment (no unlawful searches and seizures) is being trampled. I.C.E. agents bustin’ down doors without warrants? Snooping through phones? Executing people and then claiming self defense. That’s not ‘enforcing the law’—that’s wanna be fascist government overreach at its worst! I have plenty of issues with our slave owning Founders, but at the same time know they would be rolling in their graves if they saw this kind of reckless violation of privacy. Let alone killing of Americans.

Racial profiling is a fancy name for good ol’ fashioned discrimination. When I.C.E. agents go after folks based on their skin color—on how they look, not what they’ve done—that’s a slap in the face to everything this nation is supposed to stand for: equal protection under the law, and fairness for all. We fought too hard for those promises just to see them get thrown aside like yesterday’s newspaper by folks who ought to know better.

“Here’s the simple solution: accountability. Make sure those I.C.E. agents are being held to account when they trample on people’s rights. Video tape their crimes as evidence banked for future prosecution. The Fourth Amendment ain’t just words on paper; it’s a promise we made to all Americans. And another thing: transparency. The public deserves to know what’s going on. No more secretive stings and raids. Let the sunlight in and, believe me, this problem will get sorted faster than you can say ‘due process.’

By it I mean this: certain psychedelics reliably dissolve the illusion that we are separate from nature, and in doing so they catalyze a felt, emotional, non-ideological ecological consciousness. Not an environmentalism learned from books or guilt, but one remembered—as though the body itself recognizes its ancient membership in the biosphere...

Under the ecodelic effect, the forest is no longer “out there.” The river is no longer a resource. The planet ceases to be a backdrop for human drama...

Instead, Gaia reveals herself as a living, communicating intelligence, and the ego—normally hypnotized by what I called the machine of culture—temporarily steps aside. What replaces it is an intuition older than language: this is my body extended through time and space...

This is why I argue that entheogens or what most in the West call “psychedelics” are not merely personal or therapeutic tools, but evolutionary instruments. They re-sensitize the human nervous system to ecological signals we have numbed through agriculture, cities, television, and abstraction. They return us, briefly but unmistakably, to the archaic partnership between mind and earth...

The eco-delic effect does not tell you what to believe. It changes what you can ignore...

Once you’ve felt the breathing intelligence of the planet, exploitation becomes psychologically difficult. Not because of morality—but because of intimacy...

And that, I suspect, is why such experiences have always been culturally dangerous: they undermine imperial dominator hierarchies by re-enchanting the world...

In short: The eco-delic effect is the moment when consciousness remembers that the Earth is not an object—she is a conversation.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

One of the most egregious examples is the Court’s decision in Shelby County v Holder, which gutted the Voting Rights Act of nineteen sixty four. This landmark legislation, which we fought so hard to pass, was a crucial step towards ensuring that all Americans, regardless of the color of their skin, had equal access to the ballot box. By striking down key provisions of the Act, the Court has allowed states to implement voter suppression laws that disproportionately affect African Americans, Latinos, and other minority groups.

Furthermore, the Court’s decision in Citizens United v F.E.C. has unleashed a torrent of dark money into our political system, allowing corporations and special interest groups to exert undue influence over our elections. This has led to a situation where the voices of the wealthy and powerful are amplified, while the voices of ordinary citizens are drowned out. As I said in my sermon, “Where Do We Go From Here?” “We must come to see that the end we seek is a society at peace with itself, a society that can live with its conscience.”

The Roberts Court has also failed to address the issue of mass incarceration, which has devastated communities of color and perpetuated systemic racism. The Court’s decision in Florence v Board of Chosen Freeholders, which allowed for the routine strip-searching of arrestees, is a stark example of how the justice system can be used to degrade and dehumanize individuals, particularly those from marginalized communities.

And I must also express my deep disappointment with the Court’s decision in Burwell v Hobby Lobby, which allowed corporations to cite religious objections to deny employees access to birth control. This decision is a stark reminder that the struggle for reproductive justice and women’s rights is far from over.

So, I say to you today, we must continue to push forward. We must continue to demand justice, equality, and freedom for all. We must continue to challenge the systems of oppression that seek to hold us back. And we must continue to believe in the power of nonviolent resistance, which has been the hallmark of our movement from the beginning.

As I said in a prior speech on those steps of this Lincoln Memorial, “The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.” That bright day has not yet arrived, but I have faith that it will come. And when it does, we will look back on the struggles of today as a necessary step towards a brighter tomorrow. Thank you.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

Let us begin with the obvious fraud. Conservatism, properly defined, is cautious, historically literate, and skeptical of grand schemes. Empire, by contrast, is restless, messianic, and addicted to force. Yet the modern American Quote on Quote “conservative” happily marries the two, insisting that the United States must bestride the globe like a colossus while solemnly invoking the Founding Fathers—those notoriously anti-imperial figures who warned explicitly against foreign entanglements and standing armies. Oh the brazenness of the contradiction.

The conservative movement’s true constants are now no longer in any way small government and local control, but militarism abroad (especially on behalf of Israel) and executive power at home (also heavily lobbied for Israel). Budgets explode for the Pentagon while schools rot; deficits are denounced until a war or tax cut for the wealthy requires them to be forgotten; and “law and order” becomes a euphemism for surveillance, incarceration, and the suspension of civil liberties whenever fear can be sufficiently whipped up. The empire must be protected, you see, and the citizen must learn to submit.

Then there is the theological dimension—because every empire needs a god. American conservatism wraps its imperial project in a blend of civil religion and evangelical fervor, portraying U.S. power as not merely strategic but righteous. Wars are no longer fought for oil, influence, or hegemony—perish the thought—but for “freedom,” a word drained of all meaning through overuse, like a banknote printed into worthlessness. The conservative cheerleaders of invasion and occupation are rarely the ones sent to bleed or die, which gives their piety a particularly bloodless quality.

Notice, too, the selective nationalism. The conservative professes undying love for “the nation,” yet has historically happily shipped jobs overseas on behalf of corporate greed, defers to said multinational corporations for ethics of which they have little to none, and allows foreign policy to be dictated by defense contractors and lobbyists who have never met a war they didn’t want someone else to fight. This is ultra-nationalism transmuted into imperial management, dressed up in a flag and sold to the public as destiny.

And when the empire falters because it operates in a soup of lies—as all empires do—the conservative does not reconsider the premise. Instead, he reaches for the oldest excuse in the book: betrayal from within. The failure cannot be imperial overreach; it must be insufficient loyalty, insufficient violence, insufficient faith. Thus dissent becomes unpatriotic, actual real journalism becomes ridiculed, and criticism of power becomes heresy.

So let us be clear. What calls itself American conservatism now, in its dominant form, is not about conserving the republic. It is about administering an empire while pretending one does not exist. It demands obedience, sanctifies force, and calls it virtue. And like all imperial ideologies, it will insist—right up to the moment of collapse—that there was never any alternative.

History, alas, is not so easily persuaded.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

At the most basic factual level, Epstein moved comfortably among financiers, politicians, royalty, scientists, and cultural elites. This is not speculative. It is documented through flight logs, photographs, court records, financial ties, and the public acknowledgments of those who knew him. Yet the persistence of these associations, even after his 2008 conviction for sex offenses, demands an explanation that goes beyond individual judgment errors or social coincidence. What kind of social figure was Epstein that so many powerful people found tolerable, even desirable, to remain near?

The answer lies in the role Epstein played within elite ecosystems: that of the intermediary.

Elite power rarely operates directly. It prefers buffers—figures who arrange, connect, host, fund, and facilitate, while absorbing risk and opacity. Epstein presented himself as a financier of unusual discretion, someone who managed the wealth of the very wealthy without publicity, regulation, or explanation. His financial persona was conspicuously vague, but vagueness itself is often a feature, not a flaw, in the upper reaches of capital. In environments where privacy is paramount and scrutiny is resented, opacity becomes a form of trust.

Beyond money, Epstein functioned as a broker of access. He introduced academics to donors, politicians to financiers, royalty to American capital, and elites across national and institutional boundaries to one another. His homes—especially his Manhattan residence and private island—operated as semi-private salons, spaces that blurred the line between socializing, networking, and deal-making. Such spaces are not marginal to power; they are where power often feels most at ease, precisely because they are informal, unrecorded, and insulated from public oversight.

What distinguished Epstein from more conventional social brokers was the degree to which his world existed in what might be called a zone of exception. Private aircraft, private islands, private security, and non-transparent financial structures together produced environments in which ordinary constraints—legal, ethical, reputational—were softened. For individuals accustomed to operating under constant visibility, these zones exert a powerful attraction. They promise freedom not merely from surveillance, but from the need to explain oneself at all.

It is here that the moral gravity of the Epstein case sharpens. Courts have established that Epstein ran a long-term sex-trafficking operation involving minors, using grooming, coercion, and silence to sustain it. That fact stands independently of who else entered his orbit. What remains unresolved—and must be approached with restraint—is the extent to which others knew, ignored, suspected, or deliberately avoided knowing. To conflate proximity with guilt is unjust; to treat ignorance as morally neutral is equally unsatisfying.

The deeper problem is structural. Epstein’s continued acceptance after his first conviction reveals not simply individual failures of judgment, but a broader elite tolerance for moral compartmentalization. Power has long relied on the ability to separate personal conduct from public function, ethics from utility. As long as Epstein remained valuable—as a financier, connector, or host—his criminality could be minimized, rationalized, or quietly bracketed. Only when he became a liability did decisive action follow.

His eventual prosecution and death in custody produced a paradoxical outcome: formal closure without substantive reckoning. Epstein was punished as an individual, but the networks that sustained him were not seriously interrogated. This is not anomalous. Modern systems of power are adept at sacrificing intermediaries while preserving the structures that made them possible. Scandal, in this sense, often functions less as a mechanism of reform than as a means of containment.

To view Epstein as a singular monster is comforting but misleading. It allows society to externalize the problem, to imagine that evil entered the system from outside. A more unsettling interpretation is that Epstein emerged from within the logic of elite organization itself: from secrecy, concentrated wealth, weak oversight, and the normalization of extraterritorial privilege. He was not an aberration in spite of the system, but a product of it.

In the end, Epstein’s associations with the ultra-rich and powerful tell us less about hidden cabals than about visible structures we prefer not to examine. They reveal how access is traded, how discretion is valued, how accountability thins as one ascends, and how easily moral catastrophe can coexist with social prestige. If there is a lesson to be drawn, it is not about individual names, but about the conditions under which certain figures become indispensable—and therefore untouchable—until they are no longer useful.

Epstein was not outside power. He was one of its mirrors. A reflection that shows the rest of us that elites are really some of the least ethical, most criminal people.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

We began to feel something's wrong. We began to understand more dangerous things that's developing. So you're going to begin to see that man has started going out for material things and going after it. They don't care who you run to, just to get that car near radio, new airplane and you're going to keep going. But this life will be disturbed so much at that moment. They're going to disturb many things. They're going to use many things because now you can take the tree and make money out of it. Chop those trees down. You're going to dig into a mountain. You're going to take something out to make money or make something out of it. And you're going to start going all out for that. That's what great spirit warned us not to do then, but we're going to do it. So there will be a second event again taking place here. So this we're told in this prophecy in 1948 that there are greater things that we're going to invent. But these are many things, inventions, but it all leads to destroying mankind because it's done without spiritual foundation. And it's done so that it uses too much of mineral resources that disturb nature so much. And it may be that we might blow ourselves up with an event or poison the air so much that we just can't breathe good fresh air anymore. Trees and everything will be affected.

So we must find the spiritual path again because each one of us were given that by the great spirit at the beginning to use to get to that point. We all are going to that. Met things happening here, but now we are began to coming into this point. But they will not escape that. They think they can get away with it, but they are not going to because great spirit has made this such a way that no one escaped that.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

Palantir is essentially what you get when a group of very serious techno-mages decide the world needs more surveillance because clearly the issue has been insufficient watching.

They market themselves like benevolent data-shamans—”We help governments see patterns!”—but what they really mean is: “Give us every byte you’ve ever emitted, and we’ll summon a spreadsheet that tells you who’s suspicious.”

They’re the kind of company that talks about “predictive policing” with the confidence of someone who has never read a single cyberpunk novel in their life. Or worse—read them, nodded solemnly, and said: “Great business plan.”

It presents itself as a modest servant of reason. Officially, it is a data integration and analytics company. Nothing more dramatic than a maker of software tools that help organizations “see” their data more clearly. It claims neutrality with monkish sincerity: They don’t make decisions, don’t spy, don’t command - they merely aggregate, analyze, correlate, infer, monitor, pattern-match, predict, and “enhance situational awareness.” A totally different thing! It merely provides platforms that allow humans to connect disparate information and arrive at better judgments. In this self-portrait, Palantir is a mirror, not a mind. But mirrors are never innocent.

What Palantir really is, in practical and psychological terms, is a power amplifier. It does not generate authority; it intensifies it. Governments, intelligence agencies, militaries, police departments, and large corporations already possess the power to act. Palantir shortens their feedback loops between data and action, making decisions faster, more confident, and more systematized. They’re really a kind of bureaucratic nervous system. It doesn’t issue orders, but it suggests priorities, flags anomalies, and defines risk. When enough institutional decisions rely on the same software, the software becomes policy by default. Any technology that accelerates decision-making for institutions quietly reshapes the world, whether it admits this or not.

In true Wilsonian terms, they’ve built a giant epistemological filter, then convinced governments that it’s not a filter but an all-seeing oracle. And like any oracle, it occasionally produces a gem of insight… and just as often coughs up riddles, hallucinations, and bureaucratic doom-ciphers. So, by deciding how data is structured, linked, and visualized, it determines what counts as relevant, suspicious, or real. This is not traditional surveillance, which watches people; it is ontological management, which organizes reality itself into categories that invite intervention. What appears on the dashboard exists. What does not appear fades into statistical invisibility.

The irony is embedded in the name. In Tolkien, the palantíri reveal real information, but selectively, and often at the cost of wisdom. They mislead by framing. Users mistake partial vision for total knowledge and act with disastrous confidence. Palantir the company reenacts this myth in technological form.

In the end, Palantir is neither villain nor savior. It is a worldview disguised as a tool: a faith in legibility, prediction, and control, inherited from Enlightenment rationalism and turbocharged by computation.

The danger is not that Palantir thinks for us, but that institutions stop questioning how they know what they know. And when that happens, the seeing-stone does not need to deceive. It only needs to be believed.

So... as I’ve always said: The universe is far weirder than our models of it.

The winter solstice is the great hinge of the year. It is the moment when the sun appears to die, when the days reach their maximum darkness, and then—miraculously—it turns around. The light begins its slow return. For archaic peoples, this was not metaphor; it was cosmic drama. If the sun failed to return, everything failed. Crops, animals, human meaning itself. So this moment demanded ritual, attention, and myth...

Long before Christianity arrived on the scene, human beings across Eurasia were already celebrating this rebirth of light. Saturnalia in Rome, Yule among the Germanic peoples, Mithraic festivals centered on the Sol Invictus, the unconquered sun. These were not casual parties; they were acts of sympathetic magic. By lighting fires, decorating evergreens, feasting, singing, and suspending ordinary social rules, people were participating in the renewal of cosmic order...

Christianity, which was a latecomer in the mythological marketplace, did something very clever—and very typical of what I call the machine of culture. It overlaid its own narrative onto an already powerful archetypal structure. There is no historical evidence that Jesus was born on December twenty fifth. That date was chosen because the psychic real estate was already occupied. The sun “S-U-N” is reborn; therefore, the Son “S-O-N” is reborn. Logos slips into solstice almost seamlessly...

This is not deception; it is mythological recycling. Myths survive because they attach themselves to deep structures in the human psyche and in nature itself. The solstice is a fact of astronomy, but its meaning is a fact of consciousness. Christianity simply reframed the ancient solar drama in human, moral, and salvational terms...

Notice the symbolism that persists despite theological reinterpretation:Light in darkness and child born at the nadir of the year.

These are not accidental. They are archaic signals bubbling up through a modern religious narrative. The solstice is about reassurance: the universe is not collapsing; the pattern continues. Christmas inherits that reassurance and personalizes it.

In this sense, Christmas is less a historical event than a seasonal spell cast annually by civilization to remind itself that hope is baked into the structure of time. At the darkest moment, something small, luminous, and fragile appears—and against all rational odds, it grows...

So when people feel something ineffable at Christmas, something that transcends doctrine, they are not mistaken. They are responding to a very old conversation between human consciousness and the cosmos—a conversation that began around firelight, under star-heavy skies, when the return of the sun was the difference between survival and oblivion.

And that is the real miracle.

OFFICIAL SITE: https://www.artificiallyresurrected.org/ FILM / VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/@ArtificiallyResurrected/videos IMAGE / PHOTO: https://www.instagram.com/artificiallyresurrected/ AUDIO / PODCAST: https://artificiallyresurrected.substack.com/podcast

MAGA as a foreign influence operation sounds outlandish only until you examine it for more than five consecutive seconds.

If one wished to devise a mechanism by which a hostile foreign power could paralyze a nation, sow maximal discord, debase its institutions, and turn its citizenry into warring tribes suspicious of one another and contemptuous of the very idea of truth—one could hardly engineer anything more effective than the MAGA cult. It is, in effect, the political equivalent of opening every window in your house during a hurricane and then congratulating yourself on your ventilation strategy.

Now, whether the cult is a formal foreign operation is almost beside the point. The Kremlin doesn’t need to recruit you if you’re already volunteering. What matters is that MAGA reproduces the very dynamics any adversarial intelligence service dreams of: a self-indoctrinating ecosystem hostile to facts, enthralled by conspiracy, and primed to treat any criticism as proof of its own righteousness. It’s the sort of epistemic closed loop that KGB officers used to fantasize about over vodka and cigarettes.

And the cults leaders—those somber-faced mountebanks—have been only too happy to amplify narratives that just so happen to mirror the propaganda aims of foreign autocrats. If Vladimir Putin had personally drafted the talking points, they could scarcely align more neatly with his interests: division in NATO, contempt for democratic processes, and the normalization of political strongmen as admirable “realists” rather than the thugs they are.

To call MAGA a foreign influence operation isn’t to say it’s run by some Bond villain in a fortified bunker. It’s to observe that the cult behaves as if it were designed to weaken the very country it claims to rescue—an unwitting auxiliary of external power, sabotaging its own ship while shouting patriotic slogans from the deck.

In short: foreign influence doesn’t always require foreign agents. Sometimes, all it needs is a population willing to do the work for free.

In conclusion: American needs to Rehabilitate the Concept of Reality, End the Captivity of the Electorate, Offer a Politics of Competence... Not Kumbaya, Restore a Sense of Civic Shame, Address the Real Grievances—Without Pampering the Imaginary Ones, and Let Time Do Its Unforgiving Work.

When we speak of rivers, we speak of the ancient circulatory system of the Earth itself. These flowing waters are the lifeblood of landscapes, carrying nourishment through forests, wetlands, farms, and cities. Yet today, many of these once-clear arteries are burdened silently with poisons often hidden—synthetic chemicals, industrial effluents, nutrient overloads, and the countless byproducts of a civilization too willing to look away from the consequences of its own making.

In my years studying the interplay of life and water, I learned again and again that a river is not merely a channel of moving liquid. It is a living community. Tiny invertebrates cling to stones; fish thread their way through riffles and pools; birds, mammals, and humans depend upon its currents. To poison a river is, in truth, to poison a web of life so intricately interwoven that harm to one strand reverberates through all the others.

The tragedy is not only ecological but ethical. When pesticides wash from farm fields or industrial chemicals seep from neglected waste sites, the damage is seldom immediate or dramatic. Instead, it manifests gradually—fish kills that become more frequent, amphibians that fail to return each spring, sediments that accumulate toxins year by year until they threaten even those who draw their drinking water downstream. The river grows quieter, its vitality muted.

But we must remember: this poisoning is neither inevitable nor irreversible. It stems from choices—human choices—and thus can be changed by human resolve. To cleanse our rivers is to reclaim a healthier bond with the natural world, one grounded in respect, restraint, and a recognition of our shared fate with all living things.

In safeguarding rivers, we safeguard ourselves. Let us choose, with clarity and courage, to let these waters always be left in their most natural state.

To begin with, let us consider the concept of projection. Projection, is a psychological defense mechanism wherein an individual attributes their own unacceptable thoughts, feelings, or impulses to another person or group. This is a classic example of the shadow at work, wherein the repressed or hidden aspects of one’s own psyche are ascribed to others.

In the United States of America, in the case of the Make America Great Again situation, we see a striking example of projection inversion. By accusing all Americans who are not in their cult of being intolerant, divisive, and hateful, MAGA is, in fact, revealing its own unconscious tendencies towards intolerance, divisiveness, and hatred. This is a clear instance of the psychological principle of “the accuser is the accused,” wherein the individual or group doing the accusing is, in reality, struggling with their own dark impulses.

But what is even more interesting, my dear fellow, is the way in which this projection inversion serves as a form of confession. By vociferously denying and projecting their own shadow qualities onto others, the anti democratic and pro-authoritarian MAGA cult is, in effect, confessing to their own unconscious motivations and desires. This is a classic example of the psychological principle of “the protestation is the confession,” wherein the vehement denial of a particular impulse or tendency is, in fact, a revelation of its presence in the unconscious.

Furthermore, this phenomenon is also related to the concept of the collective unconscious, which I have described as a shared psychological reservoir that contains the universal symbols, called archetypes, that are common to all humans. In this case, MAGA’s projection inversion and confession against “the American Left” can be seen as a manifestation of their collective shadow, wherein the repressed or hidden aspects of the American collective psyche are being expressed and acted out.

In this sense, the MAGA cult, and make no mistake this is a textbook cult, with textbook cult behavior that can be seen as a symptom of a larger cultural and psychological complex, one that is rooted in the unconscious fears, anxieties, and desires of the most conservative American people. By examining this phenomenon through the lens of analytical psychology, we may gain a deeper understanding of the underlying psychological dynamics at play, and the ways in which they are shaping the contemporary American cultural and political landscape.

So, as I have always said, “One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.

The United States of America has always been a place where certain people believe they are entitled to the world and everything in it. They call that naming “civilization” and they build a nation out of the labor, the silence, the wombs of those they refuse to see. The empire is polite until it is threatened, generous until it is crossed, blind most of the time—but never to its own interests.

Women, it handles as though they were the nation’s soft ground: something to plant in, to dig up, to walk upon without noticing the soil shifts. Black people, it handles like an inheritance it does not want to acknowledge but cannot bring itself to relinquish—something both despised and depended upon.

But Black women—Black women it tries to unmake.

Because a Black woman remembers. Because she carries the nation’s crimes in her body and still manages to love something. Because she knows the difference between what is said and what is done, what is promised and what is stolen. She knows the empire’s appetite—how it chews through her labor, her language, her children, her dreams—and still she stands there with something left in her hands. A song. A warning. A tenderness the empire cannot understand and cannot destroy.

The treatment is not the whole story, though. Oppression is never the whole story. What matters is what Black women fashioned from it: the mercy they gave where none was given to them, the communities they built out of scraps, the beauty they insisted on in a landscape that did not intend beauty for them. They were not meant to survive, yet they made survival into an art form so intricate that the empire had to pretend it invented it.

Yes, the American empire wounds.Yes, it diminishes.Yes, it forgets.

But Black women remember—and in remembering, they remake. And it is that remaking, not the empire, that tells us both what this country truly is and what it is capable of becoming. A much superior version of itself.

If we gaze upon our pale blue dot with clear eyes, we see a moment both perilous and full of possibility.

Right now, we stand at a crossroads in Earth’s long story—a story billions of years in the making. The climate crisis is no longer a distant hypothesis whispered in research labs; it is an unfolding chapter we can feel in the warming seas, the restless storms, the reshaping of coastlines, and the quiet retreat of glaciers that have endured since before human civilization learned to speak.

We are conducting, quite unintentionally, or intentionally, a vast planetary experiment. By burning in mere centuries the fossil sunlight stored over eons, we have thickened the atmosphere with gases that trap heat and reshape weather patterns. The Earth is responding, as any living system would, with feedbacks that amplify our influence in ways we are only beginning to fully comprehend.

Yet, human beings, us peculiar carbon based lifeforms, often have two camps around this - the deniers and the doomers. For are those who totally deny we have any effect on this while there are also those who say “hopium” is a dream and there is no hope. However, neither is the way.

For the first time in our species’ history, we understand the mechanics of the danger we face. We have the means—technological, scientific, and moral—to alter our course. There is more renewable energy being used than ever across the world. Young people raise their voices with a fervor reminiscent of the greatest social transformations in human history. Nations debate, not whether climate change is real, but how to respond.

Our challenge now is not one of knowledge, but of will.

In the cosmic perspective, this is a rare test. Civilizations across the galaxy—should they exist—may face similar inflection points, moments when their technological prowess threatens the very stability of their home worlds. Whether they succeed or vanish into cosmic silence depends on their capacity for wisdom, cooperation, and foresight.

The climate crisis is humanity’s audition for longevity.

If we choose, this can be the era in which we awaken to our role as stewards of the only known world to cradle life. The Earth is asking us a question: Are we worthy of its continued generosity? And the answer, still unwritten, is ours to create—together.

The “male loneliness crisis” is not merely a social phenomenon but a spiritual one. It is the felt separation from one’s own inner source, the imagined distance between a man and the life he longs to experience. Loneliness, in its deepest form, is the forgetting of one’s own creative power.

In the West, many men have been taught to measure themselves by outer achievements, roles, income, strength, usefulness… yet rarely by the richness of their inner life. And when a man identifies himself only with what he believes he must do, he loses touch with who he is. That loss of inner identity creates a hollow space that feels like loneliness, but it is really a disconnection from imagination which is the true self.

The first movement, then, is not to seek companionship out there, but to rediscover yourself in here. When a man sees himself as unwanted, unnoticed, or unimportant, he unknowingly assumes a state that life simply mirrors back to him. Nothing changes until the inner story changes. When you dare to imagine yourself as someone desirable, valued, interesting, and deeply connected, you begin to call into your world the people and experiences that match this new inner arrangement.

But let us be clear, this isn’t about pretending. It’s about inhabiting a new state of consciousness with the same ease that you slip into a favorite jacket. You savor the feeling of being connected, of being supported, of belonging — not because it is already visible, but because you choose to make it real within yourself. And the outer world, faithful servant that it is, reorganizes itself around your assumption.

At the same time, human companionship is meant to be enjoyed. Men, like women, of course need warmth, shared conversation, real friendship, and the simple sense of being seen. There is no weakness in desiring these things. It becomes weakness only when you try to obtain them through strain or self-denial. When the inner shift happens, the outer connections form naturally. You find yourself drawn to places, communities, or simple everyday encounters that introduce you to people who resonate with your new state.

So the solution is twofold but really one movement: you return to yourself, and the world returns with you. You imagine the man you desire to be, the relationships you long to have, and you allow the feeling of that fulfillment to saturate your being. From there, a phone call comes, a friendship rekindles, a stranger smiles, or a moment of courage arises in you that leads to something new. Loneliness dissolves not because others finally show up, but because you do. The moment you reclaim your inner life, the outer world fills with the very connection you once thought was missing.

My dear brothers and sisters, it grieves my heart to know that even in the year 2025, the sacred cause of civil rights—the cause for which so many bled, prayed, and marched—is once again under siege. When the highest court in the land, entrusted with the solemn duty of guarding liberty and justice, begins to chip away at the protections that secure the dignity of the poor, the marginalized, and the disenfranchised, then we must raise our voices in moral alarm.

We must remember that the Constitution, without the spirit of justice, becomes but a hollow parchment. The law, without the light of conscience, becomes an instrument of oppression rather than liberation. If voting rights are weakened, if protections for the worker and the immigrant are eroded, if equality before the law becomes a privilege for the few rather than the right of all—then America drifts farther from its promise and closer to its peril.

Yet, I would not have you despair. For the struggle for civil rights has never been a straight and easy road. Each generation has faced its own betrayal of justice, its own Goliath to confront. And each generation has found within itself the courage to march on, to organize, to love in the face of hate, to hope in the face of despair.

Now is the time for a new movement of conscience—not of violence or vengeance, but of disciplined, nonviolent power. Let the young rise up as the conscience of the nation. Let the old remind us of the price already paid. Let the courts hear, not our anger alone, but our determination to redeem the soul of America.

We must never forget: no court, no Congress, no president can permanently bury the dream of justice. For that dream is born not of politics, but of the eternal truth that all men and women are created equal, and that injustice, though it may reign for a season, or through another decade, cannot endure forever.

We are a small group of filmmakers who got tired of rolling our eyes at shallow or malevolent use of generative artificial intelligence so we decided to use it for something benevolent and deeper - To create short cinematic documentary style talks and interviews with past philosophers who still have a thing or two to say.

Either featured as photographs only or fully resurrected as both video and podcast.

Created using the artificially intelligent ghost in the machine... all minds featured have shuffled off this mortal coil, and are included out of respect to them, their work, and to continue to honor their legacies.

How we choose who to resurrect:

ARTIFICIALLY RESURRECTED was created by an American to resurrect images and voices of primarily Western luminaries who spoke out against American Empire - Meaning supremacism, colonialism, imperialism, militarism, and the general shadow of the world and/or whose work had a variety of spiritual, psychological, ecological, moral, or philosophical dimensions.

Other than writing books, they also had little to nothing to sell you. Short of creating content to help in your own development. If you have ears to hear.

Using state of the art technology, their likenesses can continue those fights through their own words. Which is needed more now than ever.

Find all of our outputs, including the corresponding videeo version of theses podcasts, where you can see those talking doing so on screen, at artificiallyresurrected.org