Few voices in the European Parliament have been as consistent, or as willing to speak plainly, about these issues as Charlie Weimers, Swedish Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for the Sweden Democrats (Sverigedemokraterna) and Vice-Chair of the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) Group.

Following the ECR-group’s conference “Civil War: Europe at Risk?”, we met for a conversation about the difficulties Europe is facing. Weimers warned that Western Europeans suffer from a dangerous lack of imagination: We assume catastrophe cannot happen here, but after years of mismanagement in Sweden, Belgium, Norway, and beyond, society is drifting apart and the normalcy bias towards demolition could lead us straight into disaster.

Who Is Charlie Weimers?

Born in 1982 in Hammarö, Sweden, Weimers has been active in politics since his youth. He studied political science at Karlstad University and built a career as a political advisor and chief of staff before entering the European Parliament in 2019. He was re-elected in 2024 and now serves as Vice-Chair of the influential LIBE Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.

Weimers began his political journey with the Christian Democrats, but joined the Sweden Democrats in 2018, citing the urgent need for a responsible migration policy that puts the security and cohesion of Swedish society first. Since then, he has become one of the most vocal critics of unchecked immigration and Islamism in the EU.

His accomplishments include leading efforts to expose and cut EU funding to Islamist networks, including organisations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as drafting key proposals on stricter deportation rules, return hubs outside EU territory, lifetime entry bans for illegal migrants, and longer detention for security threats.

Weimers does not speak from theory, he draws on personal experiences from Sweden in the 1990s, where he witnessed early signs of honor culture in full collision with Western norms.

The Disconnect Between Brussels and the Streets

Weimers points out a glaring reality: many MEPs live shielded lives. They fly into Brussels Airport, take a taxi to the Parliament bubble, and work in an environment that feels far more “European” than the cities outside their offices. They rarely encounter the consequences of their own policies: humiliation crimes, gang rapes, robberies targeting native youth, or the everyday erosion of social trust.

In contrast, ordinary citizens in Stockholm, Malmö, Brussels, or Oslo, increasingly feel like strangers in their own countries. Weimers notes the visible Islamisation of public space and the formation of parallel societies where native populations no longer feel politically represented.

This cultural import is reversing centuries of European progress. Europe once moved away from clan societies, through Christian-influenced values, the rule of law, and the rejection of collective honour codes, to build prosperous, cohesive nations. Mass migration from clan-based cultures risks taking us backward.

Is Democratic Reversal Still Possible?

When asked whether there is a way back without violent clash, Weimers is clear: he would not be in politics if he did not believe in democratic change.

Recent developments give him hope. A proposal he helped draft, advanced pushing for return hubs outside Europe, longer detentions, and lifetime bans for illegal migrants and security threats, won the vote.

In Sweden itself, the Sweden Democrats’ electoral success has shifted the Overton window. New legislation now makes it easier to deport foreign criminals, those linked to violent extremism, and criminal clans. Sweden, once the “basket case” of Northern Europe with its infamous “Swedish conditions,” is showing signs of turning around, proving that ballot-box pressure can force real policy change.

A Message to Scandinavians and Europeans

To the people of Sweden, Norway, and the rest of Europe, Weimers offers straightforward advice: energize the youth. In recent Swedish elections, young voters were a decisive factor in shifting the political balance toward realism on migration and security. Don’t give up despite setbacks. Politics requires strategy, and sometimes compromise, but he stresses how important it is to never lose sight of the end goal: restoring safety, social cohesion, and trust.

Sweden’s partial turnaround offers a beacon of hope. The question is whether the rest of Europe will learn from Sweden’s mistakes before it is too late, or whether denial and elite complacency will allow fragmentation to deepen.

As Weimers puts it: it is time to wake up and smell the coffee.

The alternative is sleepwalking into something far worse.

What began as a revolutionary tool hailed for ending the crisis has evolved into a source of serious concern, as emerging studies and real-world data reveal potential risks that were downplayed and overlooked during the initial rollout.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher discussed in Raw Report, the gap between the original promises and today’s realities is stark, and troubling.

Understanding the initial promises and current realities of mRNA vaccines

The mRNA vaccines were launched with assurances of high safety and effectiveness against COVID-19. Officials claimed they would stop transmission, achieve herd immunity, and carry minimal risks. Yet, by 2021, cracks appeared: the shots did not prevent infection or spread as promised, and reports of adverse events mounted.

Hulscher points out that many non-pharmaceutical interventions, like mask mandates and social distancing, rested on arbitrary rules rather than robust evidence, fueling widespread confusion and eroding public trust in health authorities.

The link between mRNA vaccines and cancer

One of the most concerning findings Hulscher highlights involves elevated cancer risks post-vaccination. He references large population-based studies, including a major South Korean cohort involving over 8.4 million individuals, from the Korean National Health Insurance database, covering 2021–2023. This research showed significantly higher hazard ratios for several cancers one year after vaccination, including:

* Thyroid cancer (HR 1.351)

* Gastric cancer (HR 1.335)

* Colorectal cancer (HR 1.283)

* Lung cancer (HR 1.533)

* Breast cancer (HR 1.197)

* Prostate cancer (HR 1.687)

These associations varied by vaccine type, mRNA vs. others, age, and sex, prompting calls for deeper investigation into whether vaccination strategies need reevaluation.

Similar signals have appeared in other datasets, raising questions about long-term oncogenic effects.

Defining turbo cancer: a new threat

The term “turbo cancer” has gained traction to describe unusually aggressive cancers that appear suddenly, often at advanced stages, and progress rapidly. Hulscher cites work by researchers like Dr. Paul Marik, and related publications in the Journal of Independent Medicine, which document hundreds of confirmed cases worldwide. These include rare presentations like cardiac sarcomas and lymphomas in younger individuals - cancers that defy typical patterns.

While debate continues on causation, the temporal links and clinical observations demand attention.

Mechanisms behind vaccine-induced cancer

Hulscher explains potential biological pathways.

Genomic integration: Vaccine-derived DNA/plasmid fragments may integrate into human DNA, risking mutations or oncogenic activation.

Hyperinflammation and immune suppression: The vaccines can trigger chronic inflammation while impairing the body’s natural tumor surveillance, allowing cancers to thrive unchecked.

These mechanisms align with broader research on spike protein persistence, immune dysregulation, and transcriptomic changes observed in some post-vaccination cases.

The ripple effects on maternal and child health

The risks extend to future generations. Vaccinated mothers may transmit spike proteins to their offspring, potentially causing chronic issues in children. Hulscher references cases, including a documented instance of a three-year-old with severe health problems linked to maternal vaccination during pregnancy.

Fertility trends are also alarming. Studies show reduced conception rates among vaccinated women, alongside concerns for male reproductive health.

Welcome to Raw Report.

Sellner recounts his own experiences with travel bans, financial restrictions, and political isolation, not as personal grievances, but as evidence of a broader pattern. According to him, these measures are designed to prevent organization, suppress opposition, and enforce ideological conformity under the guise of protecting democracy.

The conversation confronts some of the most controversial issues in European politics head-on: the media’s role in shaping and policing acceptable narratives, the democratic deficit within EU institutions, and the political implications of what Sellner calls the Great Replacement. Whether one agrees or not, the discussion makes one point unmistakably clear: the conflict is no longer theoretical.

Generational unity, Sellner argues, is essential. Activism is no longer optional. And national sovereignty, he insists, cannot survive if it is continuously subordinated to unaccountable bureaucracy.

This episode does not aim to reassure. It aims to warn. The pressure is building - and time, according to Sellner, is not on Europe’s side.