James Martinez is not your average ‘Freedom Fighter’ - He was there back in the 1990s as one of the original whistleblowers together with his partner Walter Bowart (Publisher of the East Village Other underground newspaper of the 1960s).

So what is this major event in June 2026 going to be like? Well, let’s hear Steven Spielberg purposely spilling the beans as director of the movie “Disclosure Day”, which will hit the screens in America on June 12th 2026.

MK-ULTRA hitting the headlines

So you thought MK-ULTRA was some kind of wacky conspiracy theory? Well, think again! Now Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has been pushing for a hearing on MK-ULTRA in the aftermath of the releasing of NSA and CIA files from 1950s to 1970s. The hearing took place on May 13th and the day after the hearing, on May 14, 2026, Rep. Luna publicly threatened to issue a subpoena against the CIA. This action followed the agency’s alleged refusal to hand over seized documents and boxes of files regarding MKULTRA and the JFK murder case.

According to Fox News, CNN-News 18 and other mainstream medias, Trump’s Director of Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard’s office was raided on the same day as the hearing took place.

You can read articles regarding the MK-ULTRA and the CIA raid of Gabbard’s office on Newsweek and Firstpost.

Newsweek even ran the below video-explainer on MK-ULTRA accompanying their article from April 30th:

To learn how to stand your ground, you can go to James Martinez’ Patreon channel:

On Pentacost, Sunday, May 24th, 2026, I shot two videos separated by approximately 4-4½ hours. In the videos it appears as if jetplanes are painting the skies white, as a result of their jet engine exhaust.

The very next day looking up to the sky was a completely different ball-game. From the whiteish soup the day before, the sky had turned completely blue, with some planes drawing only very short-lived white tracks after them.

First video was shot on Pentecost, May 24th, at around 11:00 hrsSecond video was shot same day at around 15:30 hrs

This third video was shot the next day, Whit Monday, May 25th, at around 14:00 hrs.

Watch the first and second videos by clicking the below links:

Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.

And please do insert you comments below or send them to me by emailing flemming@de3fiktioner.dk.

This is the second live video I recorded at the Classic Car Festival in Græsted, Denmark. Now, the white lines have turned into actual thin clouds.

See the first live video I made on below link:

Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.

Or is it just bad exhaust from poor jet engine fuel? Or something completely different.

Late musician Prince thought it was “chemtrails”

Pop musician Prince spoke about chemtrails in an interview in 2009 (link to 369 Illumineer’s Substack channel).

But Prince was a popstar, not a meteorologist. What do you think?

What do you think?

Please share your thoughts in the comments below or send me an email with your thoughts on flemming@de3fiktioner.dk.

Thank you to everyone who tuned into my live video! Join me for my next live video in the app.

Did Reiner Fuellmich beat Deutsch Bank, VW and Kühne & Nagel in big lawsuits pre-COVID-19?

- Maybe, but no facts exist to suggest such a case.

David A. Hughes has taken on the task to try and find out what is the truth about this lawyer and founder of the Corona Investigative Committee.

Listen to David Hughes summarize the main points in this interview (from 1-35 minutes).

3 Camps of Awareness

About the 36th minute in this interview, David summerizes The 3 Camps of Awareness, a framework I cannot praise enough, as it helps explain the controlled opposition characters and limited hangouts that is all over alternative media these days (and has been for years!).

After releasing this framework some time ago, in February David posted an update on how to identify Camp 2 actors (go to the original post here on David’s webpage).

This sparked a backlash a few days later from Jeremy Nell who writes for UKColumn and operates the media Jerm Warfare (see his Substack channel here).

Jeremy Nell gathered UK columnists Charles Mallet and Mike Robinson (co-editor) to try to ‘calm things down’ and pretend that there was nothing to worry about regarding Marcel Jahnke.

My own exchange with Jeremy Nell started on May 12th when I could not let go commenting on what I thought was a ridiculous note posted on Substack (see post here).

After only a few exchanges ‘Jerm’ (Jeremy Nell) writes ‘f**k you’ to me because I comment that I think he is being too much pro-China in his posts and videos. Later he calls me a “shitty person” and ends his rants by “Come to Africa, get shot or raped, and then let’s talk.”

INVITATION FROM JEREMY NELL TO FLEMMING BLICHER:

Come to Africa, get shot or raped, and then let’s talk.

You can see the full exchange here below:

Jerm 12. May@mynameisjerm

I often hear that I’m a CCP shill.

That absolutely nobody in China downloads my podcast, is how you know I am secretly paid by Xi.

Flemming Blicher 7dThe Danish Illusion

For my part, I have never called you a CCP shill. I have just called it problematic that you tried to sell Chinas positive sides. I still Think so. That you dont have a problem with that when it is pointed out to you, is even more problematic.

Your download statistics does nothing good to change my view on this problematic attitude of yours.

That’s my five pence thoughts.

Jerm 7dWhy is it a problem that I sell China’s positive sides?

Flemming Blicher 7dFor my part, I see China as possibly the worst dictatorship in the World, and a Technocratic test Ground for those transnationalists in power. Any attempts in Whitewashing such a dictatorship I would Call out any time, as I would Call out Israel, Russia, Iran and fill_in_the_blanks, when people use the false dichotomy to whitewash any dictatorship.

You are good, an many relies on your commentary, as they don’t have the time to suss it all out. Just as let’s say Corbett Report. If Corbett started commenting the positives of living in Russia after a trip to Russia, I would also respectfully call him out for falling into a (dichotomy) trap.

Jerm 7dHave you been to China?

Flemming Blicher 7dHave you been to Russia?

Jerm 7dSo you haven’t been to China. Let me help you. I 100% will speak about their achievements, like safety, which I experienced first hand. I live in South Africa, one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Two of my ex-girlfriends were raped, one of them gang-raped. My wife can’t drive alone at night. We have to carry guns and pay for private security to walk around our property every night. My wife comes from a farm. In South Africa, a White farmer is attacked every week. My wife’s family have to do a safety call with the local community every night for safety.

When I arrived in China, my wife messaged me about a bomb that went off in the gang area not far away.

F**k you if you take offence to me saying positive things about China’s amazing reduction in crime. You first-world folks always preach from your pulpits, utterly disconnected from reality. You know nothing, Jon Snow.

Flemming Blicher 7dFair enough (apart from the FU), I am living in Denmark, one of the safest countries (allegedly) in the World. I do have a daughter who was knocked down from behind, in town at night. Violence being on the increase. Myself having been arrested and beaten up by the police in a prison cell, for no apparent reason other than having arranged a demonstration in front of Danish parliament. Even though it is ugly in Denmark, I take your word for it being worse in SA.

At least you have weapons in SA. Unless you register as a hunter (as I of course have done) you are not even allowed pepperspray in Denmark (pepperspray is in fact illegal in Denmark unless you have a permit issued by the police!). We are totally defenseless and at the mercy of a government who recently gave the US (not NATO, but USA!) sovereign bases in three places in Denmark. Further back in time the government also gave the police full metal jacket ammunition (not allowed in international warfare but allowed against the Danish population).

I did not think that safety in SA vs. China was related to the topic, but maybe it is, if you say so.

And quite possibly I am Jon Snow-blind to what you are trying to convey about China.

But please enlighten me as to why you apparently think that just because China being better than South Africa safety-wise, that makes your praise of the Peoples Republic of China more acceptable? Isn’t that just a kind of Stockholm syndrome if you dont mind me saying so.

Would you hope to make a lot of people in SA and elsewhere decide to live in a presumably better prison in China? Or were you just flabbergasted comparing it to your home country, when you were visiting, and spilled a few beans? Please allow me to understand why praising China makes sense in any way to you? Cause I just cant see it. I really cannot!

Flemming Blicher 3dYou forgot, or you do not want to answer?

Flemming Blicher 1dI see.

Instead of defending your position and answering me on my questions to you, you prefer to reiterate your points on David Hughes’ argument that you are China-maxxing (which is similar to the points I try to raise on your stance on China). I am referring to the post you made on your Substack profile today, which only paid subscribers are allowed to comment on. It was more or less a copy of one of your previous posts, as far as I could tell.

So, you do not want to answer my above questions on your China stance?

Flemming Blicher 13hWould you care to answer my questions to you in this thread?

Jerm 10hTwo ex-girlfriends of mine were raped, one of them gang-raped. If the CPC were able to reduce crime, I’d like to know how they did it and hope that my government can learn from them. Is that a bad thing? Or do you think it’s cool to have high crime? You can’t possibly begin to compare crime in Denmark to SA. 🤣 Denmark is a first-world country; SA is a third-world country.

My point is that I don’t approach China with a binary position. I look at various factors and take each of those factors on merit.

Flemming Blicher 10hSo on your scale of one-through-third-World countries where do you hold China?

So promoting the positive sides of China, “like total surveillance kills crime” you are trying to make the South African Government learn from China?

It makes me wonder if you are actually promoting total technocracy?

I am genuinely interested in your answers to these questions.

And if you dont mind letting me know if you have any affiliations with Jahnke Marcel, and in such case what these affiliations are, then i’d appreciate it. 🙏

Jerm 8h@mynameisjerm

* ‘So on your scale of one-through-third-World countries where do you hold China?

I don’t know.

* So promoting the positive sides of China, “like total surveillance kills crime” you are trying to make the South African Government learn from China?

I didn’t say ‘total surveillance kills crime’.

* It makes me wonder if you are actually promoting total technocracy?

Your dismissal of daily struggles, like rape and murder, make me wonder how disconnected from reality you are.

* And if you dont mind letting me know if you have any affiliations with Jahnke Marcel, and in such case what these affiliations are, then i’d appreciate it.

Questions like this make me realise you’re a shitty person who cares only about your own ego and power games. Come to Africa, get shot or raped, and then let’s talk.

Flemming Blicher 6h

I am Sorry to see how you cannot argue this topic without bad language and insults.

You decide I am a “shitty person who cares only about your(my) own ego and power games” because of an exchange of arguments, where I end up asking you to your affiliations with Jahnke Marcel.

You know why I ask about Jahnke Marcel, as he is part of the critisism David Hughes have raised on you. He displays the possibility that you are receiving perks from promoting China. Marcel, a thrifty businessowner and investor in many companies all over the place, being based in Hong Kong (I believe), could provide such perks, and has at least some Remote affiliations with you through sponsering UK Column to some degree.

Your answer to my question does not help me to rule out that your recent China friendly course is heading in a limited hangout direction.

However, I would like to invite you on a podcast along with David Hughes so that it can be proven that you are not receiving perks for China-maxxing and prove Hughes wrong in his attacks on your integrity.

Could you be interested in that?

Jerm 5h

I’m not interested in proving anything to anyone. It will be a waste of time and distraction from my work. It’s low tier gutter politics. My work can be judged on its merit.

In my humble opinion Jeremy Nell, or Jerm Warfare, has become what is best acknowledged as a limited hangout.

Definition of Limited Hangout

A limited hangout is a strategic tactic used primarily in politics and espionage. It involves revealing some truths while deliberately withholding key damaging information. This approach is often employed to manage public perception and deflect attention from more serious issues.*

*) In Jeremy Nells case the serious issues that he attempts to deflect attention from is an overall global technocracy with China as a central role model.

Jeremy Nell and Marcel Jahnke

David Hughes wrote a 4-part series at the end of April 2026 exposing Jeremy Nell and his relations to Marcel Jahnke:

Earlier this month, on May the 19th, Jeremy Nell posted his hit-piece on David Hughes calling The 3 Camps of Awareness framework out to be “nonsense”.

Yesterday Michael Ginsburg posted this video interview with Debi Evans and Sandi Adams, both former UK Column writers. In this interview Sandi Adams states that employees of UK Column are not allowed to discuss negatives on China in their articles. Sandi also said that Mike Robinson said to her that “There is no such thing as a Chinese social-credit-system!”

There is no such thing as a Chinese social-credit-system!

Mike Robinson, Co-editor of UK Column

Watch Michael Ginsburgs interview on the below link (29 minutes in the video you can watch Sandi Adams testimony on Mike Robinson and UK Column):

David Hughes has moved his main activities to his website (davidahughes.net) but still puts copies of most of his posts on Substack, typically a few days later.

[Flemming]

Hi Google AI

Please give me a short account on the tartars according to Western history books.

- - - - -

[Google AI answering below]

In Western history books, the account of the Tatars (historically spelled Tartars) has shifted from a broad, often mythical label for Asian nomadic groups to a specific designation for Turkic ethnic groups in modern-day Russia and Central Asia.

Historical Origins and Terminology

The “Tartarus” Myth: In medieval Europe, the name “Tatar” was famously altered to “Tartar” to link the fierce invading Mongol armies with Tartarus, the ancient Greek version of Hell. This characterized them as “demons” or “people from hell” who had burst forth to threaten Christendom.

A Geographic Blanket Term: From the Middle Ages through the 19th century, Western cartographers used “Tartary” as a general label for a vast, largely unknown region spanning Central and Northern Asia. Anyone from these lands—whether Mongol, Turkic, or Manchu—was frequently called a “Tartar” in Western texts.

The Mongol Connection

The Golden Horde: Western history books often identify the Tartars with the western part of the Mongol Empire known as the Golden Horde, which ruled much of European Russia and Eastern Europe.

Ethnic Fusion: Over time, these Mongol-led armies fused with local Turkic nomads. By the 14th century, this population had largely converted to Sunni Islam, creating a distinct cultural identity separate from the Buddhist Mongols.

The Modern Ethnic Groups

Modern Western scholarship distinguishes several major groups that use “Tatar” as a self-name:

Volga Tatars: The largest group, primarily located in the Russian republic of Tatarstan.

Crimean Tatars: Based on the Crimean Peninsula, they maintained an independent khanate until it was annexed by the Russian Empire in the late 18th century.

Siberian Tatars: Inhabitants of various regions in Siberia.

Cultural and Culinary Legacy

In popular Western culture, the Tartars are often remembered for their military speed and lifestyle. For example, the dish steak tartare is named after the legend that Tartar horsemen tenderized raw meat by placing it under their saddles during long rides.

Would you like more details on the Golden Horde or the history of a specific group like the Crimean Tatars?

- - - - -

Jordan Nuttall

Please find his Substack channel “Alternative History” by hitting the below button:

Please feel welcome to participate in a live video. You will have the opportunity to ask Jordan Nuttall directly the questions about Tartaria that you might be sitting on.

Please note: You wont be able to use the above link until 15 minutes prior to the start of the live video)

Location: Live Substack Video (use the link above to join)

Date: Tuesday, May 12

Time:

Copenhagen, Denmark Tue, May 12, 2026 at 20:00 CEST

London, United Kingdom Tue, May 12, 2026 at 7:00 PM BST

New York, USA Tue, May 12, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT

Los Angeles, USA Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:00 AM PDT

Moscow, Russia Tue, May 12, 2026 at 21:00 MSK

Kazan, Tatarstan Tue, May 12, 2026 at 21:00 MSK

Agenda (approximate timings):

0 min: Setting the frame and intro to Jordan Nuttall

10 min: Timeline of Tartaria (Deep dive into a thousand years of Tartarian history

30 min: Documenting Tartaria (1700’s maps, NSA, CIA, enclyclopedias, historical newspapers, diplomatic letters and more)

50 min: The Israelite-Tartarian connection

1h and10 min: Your questions for Jordan

Chat is open, so questions can be asked throughout the session.

If you missed my first interview with Jordan Nuttall you can find it on below link:

Please join us on Tuesday - We look forward to meeting you here on Substack!

Please feel welcome to participate in a live video. You will have the opportunity to ask Jordan Nuttall directly the questions about Tartaria that you might be sitting on.

Please note: You wont be able to use the above link until 15 minutes prior to the start of the live video)

Location: Live Substack Video (use the link above to join)

Date: Tuesday, May 12

Time:

Copenhagen, Denmark Tue, May 12, 2026 at 20:00 CEST

London, United Kingdom Tue, May 12, 2026 at 7:00 PM BST

New York, USA Tue, May 12, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT

Los Angeles, USA Tue, May 12, 2026 at 11:00 AM PDT

Moscow, Russia Tue, May 12, 2026 at 21:00 MSK

Kazan, Tatarstan Tue, May 12, 2026 at 21:00 MSK

Agenda (approximate timings):

0 min: Setting the frame and intro to Jordan Nuttall

10 min: Timeline of Tartaria (Deep dive into a thousand years of Tartarian history

30 min: Documenting Tartaria (1700’s maps, NSA, CIA, enclyclopedias, historical newspapers, diplomatic letters and more)

50 min: The Israelite-Tartarian connection

1h and10 min: Your questions for Jordan

Chat is open, so questions can be asked throughout the session.

If you missed my first interview with Jordan Nuttall you can find it on below link:

Please join us on Tuesday - We look forward to meeting you here on Substack!

If you haven’t met or heard of him yet, then don’t hesitate to indulge yourself by reading his extremely productive Substack channel called Alternative History (I bet you he has published at least two posts, during the time I spend polishing this video recording from my interview with him).

Why study Tartaria?

For some time now, Jordan has been focusing his energy on writing about Tartaria. Until I stumbled across his Substack channel, I didn’t really bother to understand what Tartaria was. Why should I have? I was interested in learning about my own past, my country’s past and my culture’s past, and that has nothing to do with Tartaria! I had no idea.

If Jordan is on the right track, knowing about Tartaria has everything to do with understanding Western Civilization. And the rest of the modern day world for that matter.

Well, why don’t you judge for yourself?!

A good place to start getting to grips with Tartaria is this post by Jordan from October 2025:

The Israel connection

Even The Balfour Declaration and current events in the Middle East are closely tied to the aftermaths of Tartaria.

Let at the very least agree, that there is room for more investigations in the Tartarian connection to our present day, and to the strange events going on all around us.

For now, I digress.

(below I share the after show dialogue with Jordan as a rare treat for you as a paying receiver of my Substack newsletter)

By 2022, I had lived through three years marked by the Covid-19 pandemic, constitutional violations and yet another never-ending war beginning in Ukraine. I had given what I could to my community through activism, raising awareness on social media and even by forming different political parties.

My campaign hadn’t yielded much of a result, so I decided to document it all in a book. It turned into a total of four books, with ‘The 3 Fictions’ being the crowning achievement.

The 3 Fictions was founded in my examination of the real (rotten) state of Denmark. Hence the name of my first book “The Danish Illusion”.

In attempting to answer the question of ‘what the real state of Denmark’ was, I stumbled across some interesting facts: The Danes had a highly biased, or even wrong, impression of their own role in the World.

As I examined the situation more closely, it struck me that, broadly speaking, there were three main narratives:

The Democratic Fiction

The Legal Fiction

The Economic Fiction

The Swedish Fiction

Having learnt from the coronavirus pandemic, I was painfully aware from the outset that Denmark was no exception when it came to the population living under an illusion about their own society.

So when Betina and Håkan visited me in Denmark and invited me to present my work for a Swedish audience, it was the opportunity I’d been waiting for: to explain how “The Illusion of Denmark” is also “The Illusion of Sweden”.

The same “3 Fictions” apply to the vast majority of (particularly Western) countries.

The Danish democratic fiction is not significantly different from the Swedish one.

Does Sweden have free and independent news media?

Can a media outlet be independent when it receives state funding that can be withdrawn if it fails to report ‘the right news’? I would say no.

And, not surprisingly to me, the picture of Sweden mirrored that which I had found in my investigations into the true state of Denmark.

I would say that this is probably also the case in whatever country you live in.

In this presentation, I will address all three areas—democracy, law and economics—in order to examine the underlying (3) fictions.

The Danish Illusion is a reader supported Substack newsletter. All posts are free. I rely on paying subscribers to be able to continue my work in raising awareness. If you are financially able please support my work by becoming a paid subscriber (5 EUR/Month), or buy me a (one-off) coffee.

You can listen to my first book (for free) here:

You can listen to The Economic Fiction Podcast (for free) here:

Who would have thought that Americas first ‘black’ president would - in february 2026 - be the first to officially acknowledge that “WE ARE NOT ALONE!”

Well, turns out that he wasn’t, which James Martinez explians with his own personal story and insight into events throughout the last 40 years.

Talking about timing. When I recorded the first episode with James Martinez, I was hesitant to write UFO Disclosure in the headline. And about two weeks later Barry Soetoro (or Obama if you like) comes to the rescue:-))

In the first interview James Martinez spoke about his background and the relation to Walther Bowart and his book Operation Mind Control. If you have not watched it yet, you can click on the below link:

In the second interview we got into more details about Operation Mind Control, MK-ULTRA and of course, Obamas (Barry Soetoros) recent UFO revelation:

Links to learn more about James Martinez:

https://x.com/Electric11Mediahttps://www.patreon.com/JamesMartinezMediahttps://coldfusionnow.org/ (Founded by James Martinez)

The Danish Illusion blog is a reader supported newsletter. If you like my work and you want to support me so that I can keep interviewing interesting resourceful people, you can become a paid subscriber here on Substrack, or buy me a coffee on below link. Any help is much appreciated and helps to keep me in business:http://buymeacoffee.com/flemmingblicher

Other shownotes

I mention that Inpower Movement (founded by Cal Washington) helps people to understand the contract law that they are unwillingly participating in. Go to Inpower Movements website here:

https://www.inpowermovement.org/

Also, I mention Phoenician Hunter’s book “The Secret World of Words”. It is available on his Substack:

In this second interview James describes how we all live in a split personality society. He explains in details how this ‘machine’ came to operate like it does.

Simply put, the American pizza was cut in two seperate halves when Harry Truman got the National Security Act of 1947 passed in Parliament, thereby creating the CIA and later 1952 the NSA.

When I recently saw Iain Davis publish his extremely well-written article on 15-Minute cities, I decided it was time to approach him and perhaps get him to accept an interview. Which he did.

It became a great chat, which was difficult to end. But don’t worry, I will definitely try to get him on the set again.

Introducing Iain Davis

Biography taken from Iain’s homepage:

After many years working in health and social care, following redundancy (again) I decided to devote more time to research and writing and retrained as a journalist.

My original work can be found here on this blog and on my Substack, where I often adopt a more irreverent tone. I also write original pieces for Unlimited Hangout, Geopolitics & Empire, Bitcoin Magazine, and others.

I published my first book, A Dangerous Ideology, in 2018, my second, Pseudopandemic, in 2021, and my third, The Manchester Attack, in 2024. My fourth is in the pipeline. It’s a long pipe.

I am fortunate that my work is often republished by the outstanding OffGuardian—a repository of important work and one of the most censored UK sites on social media or indeed online. Please support the OffGuardian if you can.

I am delighted that my work is also syndicated by some other fantastic sites, including Technocracy News & Trends, Lew Rockwell, Global Research and more. My work has also been featured by James Corbett and Whitney Webb, among others.

My books (in electronic form) and all my articles published on iaindavis[.]com are FREE to my blog subscribers. All content on my blog is published under a Creative Commons license and can be freely copied, printed and shared, subject to Terms and Conditions. My original articles on other sites are subject to the license operated by that site.

I’ll never advertise on this site because I don’t want to be tied to any contracts or inducements. However, if you like what I do, please consider supporting my work.

Thank you so much for stopping by.

All the best

Iain Davis

It is difficult to answer, but it definitely wasn’t to aquire Greenland, as USA can already do whatever they fancy on the world’s biggest island. Have a look at below map of American post-war bases (which is not even a fraction of the 30-50 different sites used by America since 1945).

If it wasn’t for military security and safety sakes, what then?

Why this show?

* Was it out of Trump’s own vanity so that he was able to claim that he enlarged his impire?

* Was it because Denmark’s foreign minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen needed a helping hand in his voter ratings?

* Was it to keep the public’s attention away from something else?

Personally I tilt towards the last two bulletpoints.

What’s the story about Greenland?

While front pages around the world are reporting on Trump’s - perhaps failing - attempt to acquire sovereignty, or partial sovereignty, over Greenland, there are a number of relevant facts about Greenland that are not being discussed at all, or hardly at all:

* Since Danish explorer Hans Egede’s arrival in 1721, Greenland has been considered a Danish colony (becoming a Danish county in 1953).

* In 1941 Denmark’s ambassador to the US, Henrik Kauffmann, bypassed the Danish government and ceded sovereignty over Greenland in the first Greenland Treaty.

* The US established 17 military sites across Greenland during World War II, 13 of which were army bases and 4 were naval bases.

* Kauffmann played a double game in the post-war years by working against Denmark’s openly declared desire for neutrality.

* Partly (at least) as a result of the challenge to Greenland’s sovereignty, Denmark joined NATO in 1949.

* Denmark reaffirmed Kauffmann’s Greenland Treaty by entering into a new Greenland Treaty with the US in 1951.

* The two defense treaties: In 1941, the relationship was based on the US helping Denmark. In 1951, this was reversed to the US acting on its own behalf in Danish territories.

* The constitutional amendment of 1953 made Greenland part of the Danish Realm as a Danish county (Danish: amt).

* From 1959 to 1967 the Americans equipped and operated Camp Century (approx. 200 km inland from Thule). It consisted of 21 tunnels with a total length of 9,800 feet (3.0 km) and was powered by a nuclear reactor.

* In 1968, an American B-52 bomber crashed near Thule Air Base in northwestern Greenland. The plane was armed with four hydrogen bombs, one of which is still likely to be lying (unexploded and undetonated) under the ice sheet.

* During the Cold War, the US had up to 30-50 different installations in Greenland.

* When Denmark joined the EC in 1972, Greenland voted ‘no’ but was forced to join. After the Greenland Commission (1975-78), home rule was introduced in 1979.

* Greenland officially withdrew from the EU in 1985.

* In 2009, self-government was introduced, which means that Greenland has gained even more autonomy locally.

* US presence in January 2026: According to the 1951 defense agreement, the US has legal rights to operate throughout Greenland:

* Freedom of movement: American aircraft and ships have the right to use Greenlandic airspace and waters for their operations.

* Access to civil infrastructure: The US regularly uses civil airports such as Kangerlussuaq (Søndre Strømfjord) and Narsarsuaq for logistics and stopovers, even though they are no longer American bases.

* The US often operates temporarily in other locations in connection with exercises:

* NORAD operations: During joint US-Canadian exercises (NORAD), fighter jets and surveillance aircraft operate in large parts of Greenlandic airspace to test preparedness.

* Training on the ice sheet: The US Air Force (109th Airlift Wing) regularly uses the areas around the abandoned DYE stations on the ice sheet to train landings with their ski-equipped LC-130 Hercules aircraft.

* Legally, Greenland cannot terminate defense agreements with the US on its own.

* However, according to the Igaliku Agreement (2004), the Greenlandic government (Naalakkersuisut) must be consulted and informed prior to any significant change in US military operations or facilities in the country.

* Denmark also gave the US the green light to man three air bases in Jutland (Skrydstrup/Karup/Aalborg) with the base agreement passed by the Danish Parliament in 2025. The agreement is non-terminable for 10 years.

* In October 2025 the “Red, White, and Blueland Act of 2025” was introduced in the US Congress - This bill (if passed) authorizes the President to enter into negotiations with the government of Denmark to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland. The bill also renames Greenland as “Red, White, and Blueland”.

* In addition, Denmark’s current membership of the EU means that EU law takes precedence over Danish law, which also affects Greenland (which withdrew from the EU in 1985).

From all of the above, it can be concluded that neither Greenland nor Denmark are sovereign states that can make sovereign decisions without the US. To put it bluntly, Denmark is a vassal state of the US in purely military terms, and Greenland is a vassal state of Denmark - and the US - in purely military terms.

Even so, if put in purely legislative terms, Denmark is a vassal state of the EU, through the membership of the European Union. Greenland is not an EU member, but the legal system in Greenland is Danish, the judges are Danish and the streets are patrolled by the Danish Police (however it has to be noted that a local police school was established in 2020 in Greenland).

US military bases in mainland Denmark

On December 21, 2023, the government entered into an agreement with the United States regarding American military bases in Denmark.

The timeline for the signed bilateral defense cooperation agreement betweenDenmark and the United States is as follows:

* February 10, 2022: The Social Democratic government, with Mette Frederiksen as Prime Minister, announces that it will begin negotiations on a bilateral defense cooperation agreement with the United States.

* April 19, 2022, to September 21, 2023: Mette Frederiksen’s two governments hold a total of five rounds of negotiations with the United States.

* December 19, 2023: The government consults with the Foreign Policy Committee and informs the defense agreement group about the agreement.

* December 20, 2023: The government publishes the bilateral defense cooperation agreement with the United States for the first time on the Ministry of Defense’s website.

* December 21, 2023: Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen signs the defense cooperation agreement together with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

* June 11, 2025: The government makes the ‘necessary’ legislative changes in parliament, WITHOUT A REFERENDUM → UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!

Facts regarding the bilateral defense cooperation agreement between Denmark and the United States:

* Initially, the plan is to establish three bases at the air bases in Skrydstrup, Karup, and Aalborg.

* There is no upper limit on the number of American soldiers or the size of the military equipment at the three bases.

* If a US soldier is suspected of a crime in Denmark, he or she cannot be investigated by the Danish police or prosecuted in Danish courts (unless American authorities turns them over, which they never do in other places like Germany and Japan.

* The agreement is non-terminable for 10 years but will continue automatically thereafter unless the agreement is terminated.

* The agreement involves the transfer of Danish sovereignty to the US, even on a permanent basis, which activates sections 19 and 20 of the Constitution.

The Americans brought nuclear weapons to Thule Air Base in Greenland, which is evident in the very poorly covered-up scandal surrounding the crashed B-52 bomber with hydrogen bombs at Thule Air Base. This proves that the population cannot trust Danish or American politicians when they promise that there will be no nuclear weapons at the American bases in Skrydstrup, Karup, and Aalborg.

And what about the nuclear power plant in Camp Century, build at a time when public and politicians demanded that Denmark and Greenland were free of nuclear power and nuclear weapons?

The Danish people have not been adequately informed about the politicians’ far-reaching decisions to surrender Danish sovereignty. The decision has been made over the heads of the Danish people without proper information and consent.

The US has practically occupied Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland in a very short time

In 2022, the Americans entered into a bilateral agreement with Norway similar to the Danish. See an article in Finans entitled “With new agreement, US military can operate in Norway as if it were in the US” (use your browser’s translate function)

And in 2023, both Sweden and Finland succumbed to the Americans’ desire for a strong military presence in the Nordic region.

The image below shows the 17 military bases in Sweden to which the US has access.

What is the US doing in the Nordic countries?

What has been so urgent over the past 5 years that the US is willing to sacrifice large sums from its national budget and open 40 costly bases in the Nordic countries? Of these, 15 are located in Finland, 17 in Sweden, 4 in Norway, and the aforementioned 3 in Denmark, plus the Port of Esbjerg in Denmark, which is an expanded NATO port to which the Americans already have access. Why are none of the Nordic countries’ governments putting their foot down and saying “no thank you” to the US?

It can hardly be because they are genuinely concerned about Russia’s military capabilities. Russia is a military dwarf compared to the Western European countries, not to mention the US, which alone has a military budget 10 times larger than Russia’s. So the answer must be found elsewhere.

During the so-called coronavirus pandemic in 2020-2022, a new assumption emerged among populations around the world that did not harmonize with what the mainstream media presented to the public. The assumption was that a global conspiracy by a power elite, or a so-called Technocratis Elite, would introduce a New World Order through various crises, such as pandemics and wars.

World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab even wrote a book “COVID-19: The Great Reset,“ in which he explains the steps he anticipates in this global ”reset.” According to the book, an economic reset is one of the first steps that will take place after the pandemic.

If this conspiracy is real, the United States is a country that is subject to this conspiratorial power elite. In that case, it makes sense that the US would push for the establishment of these military bases in the Nordic countries, whose governments are already under the strong influence of the conspiratorial power elite.

Having foreign troops in a country that can be deployed against the country’s own population is a great advantage (to the elite!) In this way, those in power avoid the military mutinying when it is deployed against the country’s population, as the military is not national.

But could it be a future scenario that American soldiers are deployed against the Danes? Let’s hope not, but if the conspiracy is real, it is certainly a possibility that those in power have considered.

James Martinez is a Media Ecologist, radio broadcaster, and pioneer in disruptive technologies and their effects on culture, cognition, and human awareness. Born in San Diego, California, he has been at the forefront of radio communications and non-sanctioned neuroscientific behavior modification research.

After attending the University of Arkansas, Martinez began working with retired U.S. Customs Officer Lars C. Hansson, author of the affidavit U.F.O., Aliens and “Ex” Intelligence Agents: Who’s Fooling Whom?—a groundbreaking exposé addressing intelligence-agency misinformation and covert operations. He later collaborated with a retired Naval Intelligence officer, deepening his expertise in citizen-led intelligence, counterintelligence methodologies, and independent investigative research.

Martinez’s work led him to the late Walter Bowart, a leader of the 1960s counterculture movement and founder of The East Village Other (E.V.O.), New York City’s first underground newspaper and a progenitor of modern alternative media. Bowart’s seminal book Operation Mind Control exposed sanctioned government mind-control programs. Martinez partnered with Bowart to extend this research into media ecology, behavior modification, neurolinguistics, and hypnosis.

Prior to his collaboration with Bowart, Martinez trained under remote viewer and contactee Marianne Shenefield and former OSS officer Virgil Armstrong, grounding his work in experiential intelligence disciplines and historical covert frameworks.

Following the death of Gabriel Green, Martinez inherited the complete archival records of the Amalgamated Flying Saucer Clubs of America. This body of research was utilized as the first organized step toward public UFO disclosure—preceding all later institutional and international efforts—and continues to inform disclosure research today.

In recognition of his contributions, Martinez was appointed to the Board of Advisors for the Freedom of Thought Foundation, alongside figures including Fletcher Prouty, Thomas Bearden, and John McGuffin. The foundation sought to protect cognitive liberty and repeal the National Security Act of 1947. Martinez’s work on Operation Mind Control: Volume II played a key role in exposing the global scope of MK-ULTRA, highlighting the dangers of cognitive manipulation and advancing strategic countermeasures.

Through this work, a public bridge was established—arguably for the first time—between non-sanctioned neuroscience and UFO disclosure research. This convergence became a catalyst for what is now referred to as the modern Disclosure Movement.

In 1989, Martinez and colleagues at the Freedom of Thought Foundation recognized the revolutionary implications of Cold Fusion following the work of Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann, advocating for its development as a sustainable energy solution. In 2007, Martinez was elected Director of Public Affairs for S.O.M.A. Corporation (Semiotic Off-Screen Media Affairs), the first consultancy dedicated to therapeutic media, behavior modification, and public healing through communications technology.

His broadcasting career expanded with James Martinez Live on the Republic Broadcasting Network, where he became the first broadcaster to expose systemic banking fraud, contributing to legal recoveries exceeding $850 million. He later assumed full creative control at the Achieve Radio

Network, pioneering public education on financial manipulation, digital currency implications, and economic sovereignty. The “Cash Flow” broadcast became a launch point for advances in public discourse on medicine, cognition, and human interaction.

Martinez also served on the Board of Advisors for the United Precious Metals Association, promoting sound currency policy. Addressing global energy instability, he founded ColdFusionNow.org, the first public platform dedicated to advocating Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR).

In 2012, Martinez appeared in The Believers, an award-winning Cold Fusion documentary screened internationally. He later delivered keynote addresses at the Global Breakthrough Energy Movement Conference in the Netherlands and Colorado. His work in media ecology earned him an advisory role at the Marshall McLuhan Center, where he worked alongside Vint Cerf.

Martinez has appeared on national and international media, including Dutch television, Gaia TV (with Regina Meredith) and Buzzsaw. His work has been featured in Sovereign Mind Magazine and The World I Dream Of.

During his broadcasting career, Martinez formed a historic alliance with Russell Means, facilitating the donation of the first Cold Fusion device to the Russell Means Library at Standing Rock. This made Means the first public figure to endorse Cold Fusion, and the Lakota Sioux Council subsequently became the first sovereign nation to sanction its integration.

Martinez later played a pivotal role in organizing the U.S. Veterans’ Stand at Standing Rock, co-led with Phyllis Young and Wesley Clark Jr., culminating in a globally broadcast reconciliation ceremony despite extensive media suppression. His work on indigenous sovereignty and energy independence will be documented in End of the Line by Emmy Award-winning director Shannon Kring.

In January 2018, Martinez spoke at the first Oceti Sakowin Energy Summit alongside MIT representatives and former U.S. Chief Technology Officer Megan Smith, addressing Cold Fusion, currency evolution, and indigenous policy.

Most recently, in November 2024, Martinez consulted for The Priest Group Ltd., where he played a critical role in global diplomacy, strategic advisory, and international relations. His work helped bridge initiatives between the Democratic Republic of Congo and international technology stakeholders, including the United States, contributing to strategic economic development across multiple sectors, including initiatives tied to South Africa and the Cape of Good Hope.

Martinez currently serves as Director of Intelligence for Ascension Industries, participating in high-level briefings with Defense Threat Reduction Agency and negotiating with multiple governments for deployment of the world’s first Cryptographic Energy Vault powered by Cold Fusion.

He also serves as Chief Advisor to the International Committee for Information Technology Standards for brain-computer interface (BCI) governance.

Martinez’s work continues to shape global conversations on media, finance, energy, and cognitive sovereignty. He is the author of Alphabetic Consciousness, Media Ecology, and Post-Alphabetic Law, a white paper establishing alphabetic literacy as a foundational cognitive technology underpinning modern law, consent, agency, and identity. Drawing on media ecology, the work demonstrates how

digital media destabilize alphabetic consciousness and argues that brain-computer and quantum interfaces represent a post-alphabetic rupture requiring new legal safeguards for humanity.

Cold Fusion (Low Energy Fusion Reactions)

James Martinez has been involved in Cold Fusion-projects for many years. Click on the below picture for a National Geographic article from 2019 (link):

Links to learn more about James Martinez:

https://x.com/Electric11Media https://www.patreon.com/JamesMartinezMediahttps://coldfusionnow.org/ (Founded by James Martinez)

With his experience as both a city-slicker of Moscow and a gentleman farmer in rural Russia, Riley’s is not your everyday Californication-guy. He has actually become quite a phenomenon on the internet (just like the origin of his ‘Slavsquat’ alias), as a co-founder of The Edward Institute and founder Checkenhof International Economic Forum (CHIEF) being interviewed several times on his adventures by James Corbett amongst others.

Riley and his chearful attitude is definitely not boring company, trumped by his broad knowledge of Russian-international relations. Did you for instance know that Russia is part of the IMF, and thereby also integral with The Federal Reserve system? SURPRISE?!

Did you know that Russia until 2025 payed Ukraine to transit Gazprom’s gas through a pipeline crossing the war zone, whilst young Ukrainians and Russians dies in the thousands on the war front 5 feet above the pipeline? - Probably not!

It was the intimate knowledge of Russia that prompted me to contact Mr. Waggaman to ask for an interview. So I very am proud to present “The most famous slavsquatting West coastal journalist on the internet!!!”

Please dont cheat yourself of the opportunity to follow in Edward’s slavsquat. Subscribe on the link below:

There was no bomb (in Thule, Greenland)!

Read the very amusing report directly from Folketingets (Danish Parliament’s) homepage. “DIIS - There is no bomb, there was no bomb, they were not looking for a bomb”.

Music credits: Sting “Russians”:

Below is the post that I had sent out a few days ago, which Riley mentions during the interview:

The journalist behind the book behind the movie

My name is Flemming Blicher, and this is a podcast episode where I will read from a book called Magtens Bog (The Book of Power). It was edited by Erik Valeur, Peter J. Schødt, Ulrik Dahlin, and Arne Gaardmand. And The section I will read is called “The Bomb That Disappeared.”

So why do I want to read about this bomb that disappeared? It’s about the Thule Air Base in Greenland (since 2023, Pituffik Space Base). It is because, at the turn of the year from 2023 to 2024, Denmark is facing the fact that our foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, has already signed an agreement with Antony Blinken, the US Secretary of State, to surrender Danish sovereignty, initially over three different air bases, Skrydstrup, Karup, and Aalborg, where the Americans can build bases where they can station as many soldiers and weapons as they want. The Americans already have access to the Port of Esbjerg, which is currently being expanded into an even larger NATO landing port.

Esbjerg as a NATO port is about the Americans landing a lot of material, which they then send on to Europe from Esbjerg. So the Americans are already present in Denmark. And this is where we also come to the fact that the Americans have also been present at the Thule base in Greenland, which is part of Danish territory.

And that is why I want to read this. I want to read this section from the book called “Magtens bog” (The Book of Power). And I want to read the section called “The Bomb That Disappeared,” which is about a bomb that disappeared in and around Thule Air Base in Greenland. The case dates back to 1957, when Prime Minister H.C. Hansen gave the Americans the desired permission to use “special weapons” at Thule Air Base.

But the permission must be kept secret. For many years thereafter, the official Danish policy is that nuclear weapons may not be used on or from Danish territory. On January 21, 1968, a B-52 bomber, one of the U.S. Air Force’s B-52s, crashes in flames on the ice near Thule.

In the days that follow, the Americans instruct everyone involved that this was an emergency landing and that all four of the plane’s hydrogen bombs have burned up. And so, this is a series of events that makes Greenland an unwilling party to the Cold War. I will read it aloud:

For almost 40 years, the letter that gave the Americans permission to use Thule Air Base for training and overflights with nuclear weapons was kept secret. When it was made public, the previous perception of Danish foreign and defense policy after World War II came under severe pressure.

From 1959 and for several years thereafter, the Americans stored 48 smaller and, for a short period, four larger nuclear bombs at Thule Air Base. This was contrary to the official Danish position. The secret was so well kept that neither the Greenlandic population, the Home Rule Government, the Danish population, the Folketing (Danish Parliament), nor the government knew about the permission.

The bomb that disappeared

by Poul Brink.

The lights from Thule Air Base appeared in the distance. The enormous B-52 aircraft, which had four incendiary bombs on board, was on fire. Which of them were large enough to destroy a modern metropolis? Pilot John Haug could barely see the instruments in front of him because of the smoke.

Although Thule Air Base was located on Danish territory, the aircraft did not exist in any Danish manual or report. Nevertheless, its mission had been to fly in giant figure eights over the base for hours. When Haug could no longer see the lights from the base below him, he ordered the crew to jump.

He pulled the trigger himself and saw the instrument panel disappear beneath him, while he felt... But he felt nothing. Down on the ice, the hunter Jes Kujaukitsok was riding a dog sled with his family. The polar darkness was broken by a bright spot approaching him and his family.

He stopped the sled and cracked his whip to keep the dogs from starting a fight. It looked as if the fireball had a dark core from which several holes were burning. It had to be an airplane. The burning object passed low over them.

Then it crashed onto the ice with a violent bang, and the sled shook. The plane spewed tongues of fire in all directions. The dogs now sat quietly and stared at the fire. Jess took his son and walked toward the fire. It smelled terrible. They walked until they could no longer stand the heat, then they shouted, “Hello? No one answered.

John Haug woke up and realized he was hanging from a parachute, falling through the darkness of night. His helmet and gloves were gone, and it was bitterly cold. He lost consciousness but woke up again when the parachute shook slightly. It occurred to him that it must be the shock wave from the plane exploding. Then he landed in the snow.

His right leg collapsed when he tried to walk. A lighthouse was rotating on a mountain above him. He found a hangar, but couldn’t get past the snowdrift in front of the door. He managed it at the next hangar, but the huge space was completely deserted. There was a telephone on the wall, and he went over and picked up the receiver.

Hello, this is John Hauk, pilot of the plane that just crashed. No, I don’t know which hangar I’m in, but it’s big. While he waited for them to find him, he found a parked truck and looked in one of the side mirrors. His face was smeared with blood.

My God, what a beautiful sight, he said ironically to himself. Meanwhile, the base radio station had interrupted the pop music and broadcast the news to everyone with dramatic background music. At the same time, a message had already been sent to the White House and the Pentagon. The US had a Broken Arrow code word for a nuclear accident.

A number of bases across America immediately received orders to assemble personnel. The president and some top politicians were informed that there was a special circumstance to the case, that there was a highly secret agreement. That January night in 1968 was the first time it had been necessary to address this very special situation, which had existed since 1957.

H.C. Hansen’s double game

The American ambassador to Denmark in 1957 was a jovial man who was good at appearing in cinema reviews when he helped launch new American-financed warships for the Holmen shipyard or when he inspected Danish egg deliveries to American troops in Germany.

However, his pleasant, teddy bear-like manner must have taken a back seat when, one day in 1957, he sought out the Social Democratic Prime Minister, H.C. Hansen. Ambassador Val Peterson could not have had a more serious errand. He wanted the Danish government to allow the Americans to deploy nuclear weapons in Greenland.

It was a request that held every possibility of conflict and scandal within the alliance. The Danish Social Democrats were opposed to nuclear weapons. Their opposition was even a key issue in the party’s election campaigns. The Americans had also discussed whether it was worth the risk to approach the Danes, or whether they should simply deploy the nuclear weapons without asking the host country.

But the American ambassador had read the Danish prime minister correctly. A few days after the ambassador’s visit, H.C. Hansen sent a letter to the Americans in which he gave them permission to deploy the “special weapons.” At the same time, he asked the US to keep the letter secret, and he did not inform the rest of the government or the Folketing. H.C. Hansen did not want conflict. In this way, he could appease the Americans and give them the right to deploy nuclear weapons somewhere in the kingdom where it would be almost impossible to detect them. At the same time, he could act as the conscience of the world by continuing to say that Denmark was against nuclear weapons.

At the NATO summit in Paris the following month, he defended the new Nordic line, which distanced itself from accepting nuclear weapons.

He said: “As far as the new weapons are concerned, the medium-range missiles in question, and nuclear weapons and ammunition, we will, in accordance with the line we have always taken, not consider it right for our countries to accept these weapons.” At the meeting, H.C. Hansen was taken aside by US Secretary of State John Foster Dawes and thanked for Denmark’s willingness to grant nuclear permission in Greenland. The letter was to become one of the best-kept secrets in Danish history. It was not until 38 years later that the text became known, when I read it out on the TV news.

(And it is the author, Paul Brink, who is a journalist, who reads it out on the TV news.)

The first witnesses. Before the Thule case, I actually believed that Denmark was a unique, honest country where it was impossible, unthinkable, to catch a prime minister in a lie. In 1986, I resigned as union representative at Danmarks Regional Radio in Aarhus.

I wanted to use the time I had left to investigate a major case, and I jokingly said to a colleague that there must be scandals in Denmark that matched those in Italy.

But it was purely by chance that I began to uncover the Thule case, which at that point was not yet a case. At Marselisborg Hospital in Aarhus, a laborer named Ruben Eriksen was undergoing treatment.

He claimed that the wounds on his hands and feet could not be healed because he had participated in the cleanup after an American B-52 hydrogen bomber crashed at Thule Air Base in 1968 with four hydrogen bombs on board. He had been diagnosed with a form of psoriasis, and the treatment was harsh.

He was placed in a kind of transparent tent and sprayed with mustard gas, best known as the poison gas used by the Germans during World War I. Meanwhile, the nurse stood outside the tent wearing a gas mask and protective suit.

Ruben Eriksen had previously approached an American embassy abroad to get them to take up his case, but they had rejected him. “A small man like me cannot do that. It takes greater forces,” was his conclusion.

Professor Hugh Zakaria treated Eriksen and had previously rejected the possibility that there could be a connection between the wounds and the hydrogen bomb accident. But now he had changed his diagnosis because his latest examination showed that Eriksen also suffered from lymphatic cancer. Professor Zakaria was an aristocratic senior physician and professor of the old school.

He did not say that Eriksen was now suffering from cancer due to the hydrogen bomb cleanup, but he said that he could no longer rule out the possibility. I arranged a meeting with Risø (Danish research unit), which had been partly responsible for overseeing the cleanup after the B52 crash in 1968 on the Danish side.

Health physicist Erik Valmod Larsen told me on the phone that there was absolutely no possibility that Danish workers had become ill due to radioactive contamination. Valmod Larsen, together with his colleagues and the American officers, had done a great deal of work that made Eriksen’s claims impossible. And I actually thought that would be the end of the story.

I had great faith in Risø, and I was annoyed with the Danish anti-nuclear activists, who had almost routinely come to hate the institution. But at the same time, I was surprised and disturbed by what another former Thule worker told me. It was Thage Madsen, whom I met at the airfield in Thune. Not Thule, but in Thune near Roskilde.

It was the most practical place because Danish Radio’s morning shifts started at four o’clock, and there was no room in the schedule to take time off for something as vague as atomic bomb research. Fortunately, however, the editing technician Niels had a hobby as a pilot, which meant he constantly needed flying hours.

This made it possible to rent a sports plane from the small grass-covered airfield behind the Radio TV building in Aarhus for a reasonable price, so that one could both attend to one’s news shifts and proceed with personal meetings on the other side of the country.

I considered personal meetings important because I wanted to form an impression of the credibility of the people in question if they made far-reaching attacks on the authorities. When I met Thage Madsen in an airport building, all my instincts told me that he was a man who could be trusted. He was used to working.

He was neatly and properly dressed, but not excessively so. He spoke slowly, but clearly and logically. On the other hand, another part of me was inclined to believe his story. It was about how the Danish authorities had instructed the workers when they were to help clean up the Thule base after the accident in 1968.

Plutonium is not a particularly powerful radioactive substance. Its radiation is mitigated by clothing. On the other hand, it is described as nothing less than the world’s most toxic substance if it gets into a wound or is inhaled.

Tage Madsen claimed that the workers had been gathered in a hangar, whereupon a health physicist from Risø had explained that he would undertake to eat plutonium without anything happening to him. I think his name was Valmod Larsen, says Thage Madsen.

Thage Madsen also explained that he had seen Ruben Eriksen working on hoisting the radioactive snow into containers. Some of it landed next to him and fell into Ruben Eriksen’s ears, who could easily have gotten some on his wrists between his sleeves and gloves or in his airways. Lie or carelessness?

At Risø, health physicists Valmod Larsen and Asger Årkrog had arranged a little demonstration when I arrived. They had obtained a piece of plutonium and a Geiger counter and were now showing how even paper could stop the radiation. They were eager to have me act as a test subject as well. But then we got started on the protocols.

The protocols were key documents in the case, and I was not allowed to look them up myself. They were now on the table between us and came from the various checkpoints that had been set up when the workers left the contaminated area during the cleanup in 1968.

The agreement was that I could ask questions about the records of Ruben Eriksen’s movements in the contaminated area, and the health physicists would then respond. They explained to me that it was impossible for anyone to have brought radioactivity out with them, because everyone had been measured with a Geiger counter, and if it registered, their clothes were burned and they were decontaminated.

Urine samples were also taken each time. I was almost convinced that there was nothing more to be found, but to be on the safe side, I asked if a urine sample had been taken the last time Ruben Eriksen had left the area.

This was based on the simple logical reasoning that if Eriksen had had a urine sample taken the last time he passed the checkpoint, there would be nothing more to find. Because then all the previous passages would have been covered. The two health physicists looked offended, but Valmod Larsen looked it up. No urine samples the last time. None?

Not the last time he crossed the border here, no urine sample was taken. Valmod leafed through the pages, and not the day before either. When is that? It’s March 13. Valmod leafed further back in the log. And there he isn’t either! He went through without any comment other than a ‘0’.

Now Asger Årkrog interrupted and explained that urine tests had not been necessary at all, because nasal swabs had been taken each time to see if anything had entered the airways. I asked them to check whether nasal swabs had always been taken on Eriksen. They had not.

Now I began to wonder why on earth respected scientists were saying that things had happened in a certain way when that was not the case. Had they not expected me to ask such a simple and logical question? Were they deliberately telling me something wrong, or were they just being careless with the truth?

The two then confirmed what Thage Madsen had said about a Danish scientist having said that plutonium was edible. However, it was not Valmod Larsen himself who had said this.

I think it is a memory lapse, because it is something that Jørgen Kok said at one of the very first briefings or orientation meetings, which were held in a very large hall up at Thule Air Base. Valmod explained that he would be willing to eat a gram of this plutonium.

It was astonishing information, and I was surprised that none of the other scientists had objected to information that could only lead the workers to believe that it was almost harmless to handle plutonium.

After that, I made an agreement with Professor Hugh Zakaria that he would examine former Thule workers who believed they were ill, free of charge. I talked about the matter on Radio 1, and a number of people with symptoms came forward. Some were immediately rejected by Zakaria, while he took a closer look at others who he thought looked suspicious.

This led to the question of how much plutonium had actually been in the plane. The more plutonium there was, the more dangerous the cleanup work had obviously been for the workers. However, this was not an easy question to answer. If there is one thing the Americans are secretive about, it is the construction of atomic bombs.

I started making a lot of calls to the US in the evenings after my shifts were over.

Fortunately, the US is such an open society that it is full of information, and it was possible to conclude that there must have been at least a lot more plutonium in the destroyed bombs than the three kilos reported in the reports. Experts guessed that there had been somewhere between 6 and 25 kilos.

The Danish authorities had no good explanation for this problem, other than that the missing plutonium had been blown into the sky during the explosive fire that engulfed the plane and the crushed hydrogen bombs. I began to receive phone calls from people who could contribute exciting theories.

One man called and asked if I was aware that the Meteorological Institute’s records from the days following the accident had been destroyed.

The reason was that an Arctic storm shortly after the accident had behaved differently than the official explanation, so that the plutonium dust had actually returned with the wind and settled like a blanket over the base.

Unfortunately, I had to dismiss this delightful conspiracy theory when a trustworthy man at the Meteorological Institute convinced me that the papers were indeed missing, but that this was due to a subsequent flood in the institute’s basement.

The missing bomb

I began to study another accident to see if it could provide answers to the mysterious questions about the missing plutonium in Thule.

It was the Palomares accident in Spain in 1966, where an American hydrogen bomb aircraft had also crashed. Here, one of the bombs had fallen into the Mediterranean Sea, and it took the US Navy 81 days to locate and salvage it.

The whole affair ended with the US ambassador to Spain and one of Franco’s leading ministers throwing themselves into the waves to show the tourist industry that there was no longer any danger. I noticed in particular that the bombs in the Palomares accident had been deployed in parachutes.

There was no mention of parachutes in the official reports on the Thule accident. But in one of the countless Danish articles from the time of the accident, it was mentioned that the lines to the hydrogen bombs’ parachutes were lying neatly and tidily on the ice when the rescue teams arrived. The article was not published in one of the Danish press’s flagships for investigative journalism. It was in fact published in the Sunday edition of BT (a tabloid newspaper).

On the other hand, it was written by a credible man, namely the later radio director Svend Fugl, who, however, could not remember who his source was when I asked him. It struck me as odd that the American reports spoke of a sea of flames when the plane hit the sea ice off Thule Air Base with its jet fuel, while one of the highly flammable bomb parachutes may have survived. It struck me that a single bomb might not have been destroyed at all, as the Americans and the Danish authorities had claimed. That would simply explain the mystery of the missing plutonium.

The Americans would naturally not be proud of having dropped a bomb on the seabed from one of their large bases on foreign territory. This could give them a motive to keep the matter secret. But why didn’t they just burn the bomb, as they had done off the coast of Spain?

In Spain, it had taken them 81 days to complete the task in mild weather conditions, whereas in Thule, the bay is only ice-free for a few months. There was a possibility that the Americans would have to give up and carry out the task. Then I got in touch with Per Winter, an early worker at Thule, who had now returned home to Jutland.

Winter told his story in an ingenious Jutland Danish dialect, but it was extremely exciting. Are you aware that there is an atomic bomb at the bottom of the fjord off Thule Air Base? I said that I had thought about it, but that I would like to hear how on earth he had come up with that idea.

It turned out that Winter had been a supervisor in a garage used by an American diving team in the summer after the accident in 1968. They brought underwater films with them, which were recorded daily in a mini submarine that cruised around in the icy sea. from the icy waters off the base.

The Americans had taken a liking to Winter and had gradually made him stand in the background while they watched the films. They told him they were looking for a missing bomb, and one day they showed him a large bomb-like object among other wreckage on the video. And they said it was the missing hydrogen bomb.

I tried to poke holes in Winter’s explanations by asking him, among other things, whether it could be one of the huge engines from the B-52 he had been assigned to. He firmly rejected that. He had been involved in changing engines on the emergency-landing B-52s many times, he said. He could not possibly mistake one for another.

And it was not one like that he had seen in the video. I judged Per Winter to be an honest man, and his statement was corroborated by a private video recorded by one of his colleagues, which showed Winter putting the mini-submarine in the water. It was General Electric in the US that had been responsible for the submarine reconnaissance.

In typical American fashion, I was initially met with great goodwill on the phone. Their spokesperson was immediately on a first-name basis with me. It was Paul May this and Paul May that. He promised to look into the matter. The next time, we were still on a first-name basis, but the man had become a little cooler. The whole matter was still classified. The corporation could not possibly comment.

Foreign Minister Uffe Elleman Jensen looked sly when I asked for his comment. He took the pipe out of his mouth and said, “How much do you have on it?” He looked as if he was making some quick calculations when I started talking about a laborer from Jutland. Then he promised to forward the matter to the Americans.

I had a lot of thoughts before I presented the case of the missing plutonium on TV’s Sunday news program in 1987. After all, it’s not every day that you claim there might be a missing hydrogen bomb on the seabed in front of one of the world’s most important American bases.

The series led to the usual angry letters to the editor from the nuclear lobby in Denmark, but for a long time, nothing was heard from the US. Then one day, I was told that a response had now been received from the Americans to the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The submarine films existed. I asked if they showed anything interesting. He couldn’t answer that because it was classified.

But someone must have seen them, otherwise you wouldn’t know what they show. Yes, some officers from the Air Force or another branch of the military have seen them, and they say there is nothing interesting on them. Can I see the films? No, you can’t.

Can I talk to the officers who have seen them? No, you can’t. Can’t you just give me their names? Then I’ll call them myself. No, that wouldn’t be a good idea. Why not? No, it wouldn’t be appropriate.

It seemed a little strange to me that I had now provided the Danish state with something that its representatives should long ago have ensured was in Danish hands, only to be met with such a stiff-necked refusal. But that was the Foreign Ministry for you. Fortunately, a question popped into my head.

So, are these all the films the Americans have sent you? Um, yes, there seems to be a little missing. How much is it? I don’t know exactly. Is it 10 minutes? It’s probably a little more. Is it 20 minutes? 20 minutes. It’s probably a little more. Is it an hour or so? It’s probably a little more than that.

It turned out that 17 hours of video recordings were missing. The senior official assured us that the Americans had not edited the recordings. It was simply a matter of an enormous amount of investigative work, as the clean-up operation after the accident had involved a whole series of military bases around the US.

After some time had passed, the rest of the films arrived in Denmark, but I was still not allowed to see them. The Americans’ position was that there was no intact bomb on the seabed.

Questions and answers

The problem of the missing plutonium was virtually unsolvable.

When I asked the American authorities, they claimed that everything had come to light. So did the Danish leader of the investigation that the Prime Minister’s Office had launched after the many reports about Thule. His name was Kaare Ulbak, and he was the head of the National Institute of Radiation Hygiene.

He had had the opportunity to attend official meetings with the US State Department, the US Air Force headquarters, the Department of Energy, the Oak Ridge University Group, which was in charge of hydrogen bomb research, etc. But then one day in 1995, I became aware that something was going on in the Ministry of Health, which Kaare Ulbak was part of.

I spoke to a head of office, who informed me that I could have a fax sent to me, but that I should also speak to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It sounded exciting, because when the Ministry of Foreign Affairs began to take control of other ministries, it could mean that another country was taking control of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. At least, if the US was involved.

A fax arrived with a copy of an official letter from Kaare Ulbak to the Americans. The letter looked completely normal, except for some large spaces between the paragraphs. Why was there unrest? An official at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs explained that one should pay attention to the bullet points in certain places in the paragraphs. Only now did I notice the line.

It was next to blank spots that we had simply thought were large spaces between paragraphs. It’s because we had to check it with the Americans, said the official. He denied that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had been in the process of allowing the Americans to censor the text.

One could well understand the temptation for the hitherto correct official, Kaare Ulbak, who wrote that the US had lied to him. However, he was still sufficiently of an official to use the term “incorrect information.” His criticism was unusually harsh, stating, for example, that the Danish Health Authority had received incorrect information at a meeting with the American authorities in Washington in August 1988. This incorrect information formed the basis for information provided to the government, the Folketing, and the Danish population. The Danish Health Authority finds this unacceptable. Against this background, the Danish Health Authority finds that the US authorities have a problem to explain and that the Danish authorities should officially contact the US government about this. It was not surprising that the text had been deleted by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. No one in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs could have a career if they messed with the Americans, and this had to be considered one of the harshest criticisms ever made.

In short, he had discovered that there was not 3, but 6 kilograms of plutonium in the bombs. Furthermore, a document showed that in 1968 the Americans were searching for a missing object on the seabed. They did not manage to find what they were looking for. “It was further speculated that the missing XXXX, in view of its ballistic characteristics, may have come to rest beyond the observed concentration of heavy debris.”

It is clear that this response in 1995 gave new fuel to my old hypothesis that the Americans could have forgotten a bomb on the seabed.

I asked Foreign Minister Helveg Petersen what he would do, and he reluctantly promised to ask the Americans. The Ministry of Health was tasked with drafting a letter that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs could send to the Americans. It illustrates perfectly the power relationship between a small country and a superpower. It should be remembered

that the starting point was that the Danish investigation leader had said that the Americans had lied to him and that the Americans had lost a missing object on Danish Greenland territory. Throughout the years, there has been good and positive cooperation between the Danish and American authorities in this case.

This will certainly also be the case in connection with the attached questions, which have arisen as a result of an apparent discrepancy between our previous knowledge and the information in the now released documents. The American response was distinctly self-assured. The key paragraphs begin almost like the script for a John Wayne film. American Air Force soldiers searched 30 square miles shoulder to shoulder for wreckage.

The response stated that weapon parts could have fallen through the ice, but that none were ever found. However, the Americans acted as if the Danes had never asked what they were actually looking for. This revealed an impressive arrogance. They could have simply released the disputed document without redactions about the missing object.

In short, the response was completely meaningless, but Health Minister Yvonne Herlev Andersen was not to be swayed: “I must refer you to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but you will not get anything out of them. And that comes from the highest level of government.” At the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, things went as expected. Niels Helveg Petersen referred to the Ministry of Health.

It was not only civil servants who were afraid of antagonizing the Americans for the sake of their careers. The power of the United States was both frightening and fascinating. It was like observing the relationship between ancient Rome and a vassal state. The American ambassador was not exactly happy about the mention of his country.

When I tried to get a comment from him about the missing bomb, strange noises came out of the phone at first. Then it became understandable. Is this the thanks we get for saving you during World War II? Then it got worse and worse, even though I tried to talk about the Anglo-Saxon press tradition, which made openness necessary, etc.

But the ambassador was clearly angry with our small nation. For example, when I ask Denmark to send four police officers to Haiti for a UN mission led by the US, there is a terrible fuss. You can’t even find four police officers.

He was very upset that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs left him waiting when he arrived unannounced. It was impossible to get through to the ambassador with good arguments. He had to be challenged. Back in 1995, the US had not yet sent troops to the Balkans, so I tried that argument.

But Mr. Ambassador, if nothing else, Denmark has soldiers in Bosnia, doesn’t it? The US does not. The ambassador pondered this for a moment on the other end of the line. Then he replied. That may be true, but the US has more aircraft flying over Bosnia every day than there are in the entire Danish Air Force.

Such an exchange of views may seem childish, but that was what was needed. We are now on speaking terms, and the next day an invitation arrived. A visit to the American ambassador is an honor. If you compare it to the world of music, he would be a rock star.

Since the US had, for a number of years, if not definitively, then at least exercised a strong influence on Danish foreign policy, the ambassador was not a man to be offended in the political establishment. Edward Elson had been appointed ambassador to Denmark because he had donated $1 million to President Clinton’s election campaign.

His primary residence was a castle in Atlanta, originally built by a president of Coca-Cola as an exact replica of Hewer Castle, which Henry VIII had built for one of his wives, Anne Boleyn. Berlingske Tidende assessed him in almost royal terms.

Our personal impression of Mr. Elson was that he was lively, enthusiastic, open, and informal, with a well-developed sense of humor and totally convinced that he could “do a good job.” Politiken described him as the aristocratic, friendly and welcoming Ambassador Elson, who spoke with the newspaper’s staff while the logs crackled in the Tudor fireplace.

The American Embassy is located on Dag Hammerskjolds Allé in Copenhagen. It is the only embassy that has guards patrolling the sidewalk, where guests are asked to explain their business before they are allowed to enter the front door. This may be necessary to deter terrorists, but it is also a show of power.

The ambassador turned out to be unusually small and slight as he showed me to a table covered with open-faced sandwiches. He explained that he had had a large part of the Danish elite there for talks. I noticed that this also included trade unionists.

However, the ambassador quickly gave me a little lesson in what Denmark historically owes the United States. How many Danes fought on the Allied side during World War II? I think it was eight. That’s possible, Mr. Ambassador. I don’t remember the number, but one might have wished there were more.

The ambassador went on to talk about the many American soldiers who had given their lives for Denmark’s freedom. This included everything from the large cemeteries in Luxembourg to an American pilot who was commemorated on Bornholm. His parents would never have the opportunity to see his grave, but he gave his life to liberate you.

After several examples, Elson summed up. If we had not liberated you, you would either be living under an emperor or under Stalin. He then continued his historical lesson with more recent examples of Danish foolishness under the footnote policy. And then the ambassador became angry again about the Haiti issue. Let us elaborate on the Haiti issue. It is also Americans who are offering to resolve it.

We are only asking for four Danish police officers. But when I went to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, they said they did not have time to receive me. So I banged on the table and said, “Listen, how many times have I come here personally?” Then they understood, and I got a promise for the four police officers.

We now approached the Thule case and discussed the letter the Americans had sent in response to the Danish inquiry regarding the missing object. The Americans had not responded to anything, and yet Foreign Minister Niels Helveg Petersen had written a strange description in which he almost thanked the Americans for always providing all the information.

The ambassador explained that he had put pressure on Niels Helveg Petersen. “I remember that strange text well. Now I understand it better, if it was you who twisted Helveg’s arm.” The ambassador did not comment further, but smiled and sipped his wine. Then he summed up the relationship between our two countries. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

I myself am a great admirer of the efforts of the United States and England during World War II. So much so that I often spend my free time reading new works about this unique and encouraging period in world history, when good so clearly triumphed over evil.

But it seemed to me that the ambassador was exaggerating the moral obligation if he believed that a small country, out of gratitude and guilt, even 60 years after the end of the war, should not question the United States’ later policies. Before we moved on, however, the ambassador also had a story about his power over careers in the Danish administration.

He had been at a reception at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs where a young civil servant had had too much to drink and came up to him. The young man asked the ambassador how it could be that the Americans did not have soldiers in Bosnia when they had had so many in Vietnam.

Ambassador Elson looked at him angrily and said, “Young man, you are way out of line. If you don’t leave immediately, I will make sure you don’t have a job tomorrow.”

One couldn’t help but wonder if this was a figurative warning, since I myself had mentioned the absence of American soldiers in Bosnia. But I decided to just take it as a good story.

The ambassador became quite sad when he talked about his disappointment at seeing Denmark support French proposals to impose quotas on American films. What is this, rationing culture? We are the rich uncle that everyone loves to hate. I try to explain that Hollywood’s worldview has become the world’s worldview. We have all grown up with the Western hero riding off into the sunset across the prairie, while we hardly ever see a French, Spanish, or German film. However, the ambassador’s mixture of excitement and sadness was so strong that I had to go to extremes and explain how my old mother had loved Spencer Tracy.

Precisely because he symbolized a quiet American common sense and generosity. And that my family came from a poor part of West Jutland, where some of the best had emigrated to the United States. Yes, we actually felt that part of the United States was our heritage.

We had to try to make the ambassador understand that critical interest in America’s presence in Greenland did not necessarily stem from malice. Perhaps it would be possible to open his eyes if we presented him with the opposite situation. It would be pointless for me to construct an example involving our own small country.

But the French had both nuclear weapons and sufficient arrogance. Mr. Ambassador, could you imagine what the US would say if France dropped a couple of nuclear bombs off the US coast and then said, “Bring it on”? Imagine if the French said they would give the US all the necessary information about the accident, except for information that conflicted with France’s security interests. Would the US accept that? No, that would be completely unthinkable. The ambassador avoided commenting on the comparison.

But one must understand that a Dane cannot live with the fact that there is something secret on Danish territory that a foreign power will not disclose. It is simply a matter of honor, just as they mentioned that one should not bite the hand that feeds you.

No, it’s like the cowboy movie and the hero riding off into the sunset that we talked about before. You trust your friends. Danes must learn to trust us Americans. You must trust us.

The conversation may seem a little exotic when recounted in a sober and dispassionate manner, but it was conducted in all seriousness, since it was essentially about power. The ambassador maintained that there was no bomb at the bottom, and he refused to allow the crossings-out in the paper referring to an ‘object of a ballistic nature’ to be deleted.

It was exciting to talk to the ambassador because, as a representative of the superpower, he exuded power. But to be honest, I think my arguments fell on deaf ears. For Elsen, Europe was a wonderful place, but only if Europeans knew their place. Europeans were not in the same league as Americans.

The American archives.

Power is about insight and information. But it is also a question of money. When I first went to the US to find information, I did so at my own expense. The regional radio station in Aarhus naturally did not have the funds for research abroad. I understood that perfectly well, so I approached the New York Times to propose a collaboration.

The venerable newspaper fills every journalist with awe, and I tried to make the most of an audience with two of the editors. The thin and well-balanced one was very friendly, while the fat one was aggressive towards the journalist from a local radio station in a distant country.

In the end, the thin one won the fight, and I was offered a trip to Washington to talk to the newspaper’s defense correspondent. However, he was busy with something else for the next few days.

I did a simple calculation that gave me goose bumps at the thought of my depleted overdraft, which would grow and grow while I sat and flourished in a hotel in Washington. So I ended up having to decline the offer. Instead, I started looking at the US state archives, which were a pleasant surprise.

While the Danish archives are designed to prevent citizens from gaining insight into the actions of politicians, the American archives are designed to give citizens insight. This is a consequence of the American Revolution and the War of Independence, where the evil King George was defeated and emphasis was placed on the rights of the individual citizen.

In Denmark, on the other hand, we continued the traditions of absolute monarchy in this area after the Constitution of 1849. It was thus in the American archives that one could see with what wonderful matter-of-factness the Americans considered buying Greenland after the war. A prominent businessman even suggested conducting nuclear tests there and received an understanding letter from a high-ranking official.

However, Denmark was not without its own trading talent. The archives show that we had offered the Americans base rights after the war if they would accept between 8,000 and 15,000 German refugees in the American occupation zone in Germany. However, there was one particular telegram that surprised me especially because it was so unpleasant.

It showed that the guardians of democracy were prepared to trample democracy underfoot for the sake of the Western world’s defense of democracy. It was written after the disaster on the night of January 21, 1968, when the American hydrogen bomb aircraft crashed on the sea ice from Thule Air Base. The American ambassador, Catherine E. White, was awakened by phone calls at her magnificent villa in Hellerup.

Air attaché Ridley Kemp had gone to the embassy at Dag Hammerskjolds Allé 24 at the end of the lakes in Østerbro in Copenhagen and tried to get things under control. One of the first things he did was to immediately requisition a plane from the US Air Force center in Wiesbaden, Germany, in case the ambassador needed it.

Then, in collaboration with Ambassador Katharine E. White, he wrote the first report to the US, in which he raised the possibility of keeping the accident secret until the parliamentary elections in Denmark were over. Perhaps Prime Minister Kragh will postpone the announcement for as long as possible to avoid any unfortunate influence on tomorrow’s parliamentary elections.

The pilot

I decided to track down some of those involved. The pilot of the B-52 bomber, John Hauk, now lived in the southeastern United States, and he confirmed that both crew members and family had been sworn to secrecy. We were all instructed that the matter must not be disclosed for the sake of the Danish election.

However, the navigator had children who attended a private school. The children were informed, and the matter came to the attention of the school principal. He decided that it was a good way to generate publicity for the school, so he called the AP news agency, which broke the story.

The pilot’s report was interesting, but also sad, because it confirmed that our democracies had considered using methods that belonged in the political universe of the Soviet Union. John Hawk had been a central part of the American nuclear weapons preparedness, which was essential to the United States’ position as a superpower. America had missiles, but they could be taken by surprise by an unexpected Soviet attack.

That is why B-52 aircraft were on standby 24 hours a day with hydrogen bombs on board, ready to be directed towards the Soviet Union at a moment’s notice. Now I met a small man in a short-sleeved shirt who, standing among cactus plants, told me his thoughts if he had had to drop the bombs. I am religious, yes, but I never thought specifically about the bombs in that context.

They could destroy an entire city instead of what normal bombs can destroy. But I never thought about them in particular. I asked him several times about this central theme, but Haug convinced me that he really would have dropped them without the slightest hesitation.

He even emphasized that he had applied to be a bomber pilot instead of a fighter pilot because “it was more fun.” When I visited him at home, I couldn’t help noticing that it was his wife who wore the pants.

He didn’t mind commenting on the paradox that, like a god, he could have ended the lives of 100,000 people, while his wife wore the pants. When it comes to war, it’s different. I’m a hawk.

Our attitude at the time was that we were angry with the government because it wasn’t doing enough in Vietnam, but you can’t wage war with your hands tied behind your back. It’s the same in Korea. We should have dropped an atomic bomb when the Chinese entered the war. That would have stopped them.

In 1968, John Haug’s wife had found it difficult to understand why there was no mention of the accident on television for the first few hours. The man who had been assigned to prevent this was Phil Goulding. The man who had been assigned to prevent this was Phil Goulding, the Pentagon’s press secretary.

He received the call about the accident on one of the two tap-proof gray telephones in his home. He immediately contacted the US State Department. The State Department said that the Danes would probably be even more upset about such a nuclear accident than the Spaniards had been two years earlier, because the Danes were so ‘nuclear nervous’. Not least because Denmark was facing a general election in which Prime Minister Jens Otto Krag’s fate was at stake. Goulding then called Colonel Helmann Tholer, who was sitting in his newly furnished apartment, looking forward to enjoying a quiet dinner with his 16-year-old daughter, with whom he had been left alone after the death of her mother.

Helmann Tholer’s job description was almost that of a special envoy for the president or the Pentagon. His last major assignment had been to handle public relations during the riots in Chicago in August 1967. Later, he was to take care of the press side of President Johnson’s summits.

It’s Phil Golding who has crashed a B-52 at Thule Air Base in Greenland. You have to leave immediately. I can’t. I’m about to eat. There’s a plane ready at Edwards. It’ll be easier in 45 minutes. I can’t. It takes 45 minutes just to drive out there. Then leave right away.

When Hellmann Tholer got there, the plane was indeed ready. It was loaded with supplies for Thule, and sitting up front was a nurse who was also going there. At the same time, telexes were sent from the US to the American commander at Thule, who had received no fewer than six by the time the plane landed.

The commander rushed over to Hellman Tholer and said, “I understand. You have full authority to make a statement. I understand. Have I done something wrong? Have you already complained or what?” Helman Tholer began preparations, which included briefing the pilot, who was instructed to later maintain that he had not flown over Danish territory with nuclear weapons. It had simply been a failed emergency landing.

When the Danish and foreign press finally arrived at Thule, John Haug and the rest of the surviving crew were presented, and they stuck to the rehearsed story. It was fascinating to meet some of these people on home turf. Pilot John Hawke, who had never given much thought to the political implications of his job.

Phil Golding had apparently had some sort of nervous breakdown because of US policy during the Vietnam War. And Colonel Helmann Tholer, who, surprisingly, was the most fun and interesting to talk to, even though he was a bit of a brash action man. What was the difference, if you were to compare them to Danish civil servants and officers?

The difference could probably be summed up in the expression “All the world was their playing field.” They really did have the whole world at their disposal. South America, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe—nothing was foreign to them. They could travel anywhere and encounter American bases or American outposts that resembled their homeland. They had no doubt about the US’s right to rule the world.

Danish officials looked cautiously over their shoulders so as not to offend the superpower, while Denmark was a minor detail in a major game for America’s own officials.

The secret agreement.

I spoke to a large number of people, all of whom denied that there were any secret agreements.

Except for one person, who spoke so cryptically that it was impossible to use publicly. That person was John Letty, who had been Deputy Secretary of State at the time of the accident in 1968.

Yes, Mr. Brink, I don’t remember much about it, but it seems to me that the Prime Minister did not want the matter to come to light because there was a secret agreement between us that we could fly over, and he did not want that to come to light, as I remember it, but it is not entirely clear to me, he said on the phone.

He then played on his age and alleged frailty and would not agree to my visiting him the next day. The next day, he was even more vague about a possible agreement. If there had been one at all, it could have been either verbal or written.

It was not easy to determine whether the man was senile and confused Denmark with one of the countless other countries with which the US had agreements, or whether he was deliberately teasing the journalist by dangling a scandal in front of him in such a vague form that he knew it could not be made public.

The archives in Denmark and the US were closed in this key area. Chief Archivist Otto Scheppelern at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed me that I would not be able to obtain a single piece of paper on the Thule case. There was not much else to do but wait, if any secret political documents existed at all. Help came from an unexpected source.

One day, I received a call from Mario Schmidt, chairman of the Thule workers, who was in Washington and wanted to be interviewed. He had found secret documents in the archives. What is it, Mario? Well, it’s about how they wanted to delay the release of information about the accident until after the elections in Denmark were over. Is it the telegram saying that the Americans thought Krag wanted it that way?

Yes, you could say that. But there’s more. We’ve found a couple of kilos of papers. What do they show? Well, we have to go through them first. But it’s a scandal. It didn’t sound like the ever-combative Mario Schmidt had found anything new.

But on the other hand, the initiative showed that ordinary people could find more in the archives in the US than the Danish government could in Denmark. So I asked Frank Esmann to do an interview and send it home via satellite. That was just what was needed.

The top officials at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs were so concerned about what the two kilograms of unspecified papers might contain that they sent a man to the basement to check what they themselves had. The official in question found the scandalous document, which showed that Prime Minister H.C. Hansen had made a secret nuclear policy with the Americans, and that Prime Minister Jens Otto Krag had known about it. And Prime Minister Paul Hartling. As well as some centrally placed officials. The next day, a meeting was arranged between Foreign Minister Niels Helveg Petersen and Prime Minister Poul Nyrup Rasmussen. One would think that the Danish government would immediately contact the Folketing and the Danish and Greenlandic people, but no. They kept the matter secret and instead sent the director of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Henrik Wölk, to the United States.

One would have liked to have been a fly on the wall when he was granted an audience: “Excuse me, but we have discovered that we and you have a secret nuclear policy together, which we ourselves were not aware of.”

It took over a year before the government deemed it appropriate to inform the Danish people. This finally happened on June 29. It is probably not entirely wrong to believe that they had hoped the matter would be forgotten during the summer holidays.

The next day, I had an audience with Niels Helveg Petersen, just as US Secretary of Defense William Perry was about to visit him at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The strange thing was that the government had not presented the secret agreement itself. They had only said that it existed. But Helveg was not inclined to release the papers.

And then there is an exchange here where Brink says: “When will you release it?”

Helveg: “Well, it’s not something I release. There is legislation governing that.”

Brink: “Is it 50 years?”

Helveg: “60, I think.”

There was no legal requirement that the papers had to be kept secret for that long. It was a way of evading responsibility. Another thing was even more peculiar and showed the completely exaggerated subservience of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs towards the Americans. During a whole year of negotiations, they managed to avoid asking the Americans whether they had made use of the agreement.

Brink: “Have nuclear weapons been stored in Greenland?”

Helveg: “I don’t know.”

Brink: “You don’t know?”

Helveg: “No.”

Brink: “You’re the Danish foreign minister!”

Helveg: “I know that there have been flights with nuclear weapons on board.”

Helveg made flying motions with his finger in the air in front of him. “That much is clear. But whether they have been stored in Greenland, I do not know.”

Brink:“Won’t you ask the Americans about that? You were supposed to meet with the Secretary of Defense now.”

Helveg: “What is important in this context is to make it clear in Danish politics that no overflights or storage took place, that it was not true.”

Helveg cut through the air in front of him with his flat hand like a knife to mark a boundary.

“The Danish public has a right to know this, and that is what has happened with the report. There are a number of details that are difficult to go into.”

Brink:“Yes, but there is no detail about what has been stored.”

Helveg: “Yes, but I don’t know. I have to say that.”

Brink: “No, but would you like to ask about it?”

Helveg: “Yes, but there are no deliveries today. Whether there have been any, I don’t know.”

Brink: “Would you like to ask about it?”

Helveg: “No, I think the matter has been fully clarified. The statement that has been issued here has been agreed in every detail with the American authorities. And in any case, there are no stockpiles today, and there haven’t been any since 1968.”

Brink: “Am I to understand that there has been storage in the past?”

Helveg: “I don’t know.”

He leaned forward and looked insistent.

Brink: “But why don’t you ask Perry about it? You’re going to meet him now, aren’t you?”

Helveg: “Yes, but I have other important matters to discuss than history.”

Brink: “Is it so as not to offend the Americans?”

Helveg: “Not at all. We have had good cooperation with the Americans in this case.”

On the other side of the harbor base, a number of limousines, police cars, and motorcycles were now waiting. The Danish foreign minister hurried over, and I wondered how on earth a radical minister had managed to avoid asking such fundamental questions.

However, my friendly questioning had paid off, because it later turned out that our foreign minister had plucked up the courage to ask the American defense secretary the impertinent questions. At a press conference a few days later, the leader of Greenland, Lars Emil Johansen, came to Copenhagen to meet with Foreign Minister Helveg Petersen and Prime Minister Poul Nyrup Rasmussen.

It was boiling hot at the press conference, but Helveg hunched over as if he had a big fish in his basket.

Helveg: “The question has been raised as to whether the Americans took advantage of the permission to station nuclear weapons in Greenland.”

Helveg made several small statements to delay answering his own question.

Helveg:“During the visit of US Secretary of Defense Parris the other day, I had the opportunity to ask him whether the Americans actually made use of the permission, and they have now investigated this.”

Helveg was so good at creating suspense that even the press photographers stood still to listen.

“I am happy to say that they did not.”

The Americans had now had the opportunity to look through their archives, and there were no nuclear weapons in Greenland. I sat there feeling relieved on behalf of the minister and the nation, but God help him if it’s a lie, I thought. It was.

Later that summer, Helwig had to come clean and announce that, after renewed contact with the US, it had been discovered that the Americans had had nuclear weapons at Thule Air Base between 1959 and 1965. There had been 48 small nuclear weapons as part of an air defense system, as well as four larger nuclear bombs for a shorter period.

H.C. Hansen’s letter to the Americans.

As mentioned, I wanted to see H.C. Hansen’s letter to the Americans. This should have been easy, given that the government constantly talked about openness. But it turned out to be quite difficult. I first requested to see it under the Freedom of Information Act, but Helveg Petersen refused to hand it over, stating that I should apply under the Archives Act.

It sounded far-fetched, and it was. But it concealed a well-thought-out power play. Under the Archives Act, the foreign minister could claim that the document was no longer in the Foreign Ministry, but had been moved to the National Archives next to the Folketing on the other side of Knippelsbro. And the National Archivist could be blamed for not wanting to hand it over.

This led to some Kafkaesque power struggles between the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Archivist, Johan Peter Noack, who had started his career by championing openness. Since the document had not actually been sent to him, he did not want to end up taking the blame in the eyes of the public.

Viewers got involved because I described the grotesque situation in a series of reports under the motto: “Does Denmark’s history belong to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the people?” A sweet and strict senior woman at the National Archives explained to viewers that you could only request the documents if you knew their registration number.

And since the papers had probably never been registered, it could take years just to determine whether they even existed. It was a Kafkaesque demonstration of bureaucratic abuse of power. My tactic of smoking out the papers paid off. National Archivist Johan Peter Noack called the Foreign Ministry’s chief archivist, Otto Scheppelern, and believed him.

If Scheppelern did not send the papers over immediately, Noack would have to tell Brink that the papers were not in the National Archives. However, he declared himself willing to save the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from this predicament by having the papers brought over immediately.

Otto Scheppelern was a stubborn man who, four years earlier, had written that I could not be given a single piece of paper about the Thule case. He stood his ground, so the National Archivist now called the Director of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Henrik Wölk, who was in a meeting with a group of ambassadors. The pressure worked, but the Ministry of Foreign Affairs still tried to prevent publication.

Helveg Petersen’s secretary, Liselotte Simonsen, called me and said that Chief Archivist Scheppelern had now decided that I could have access to the papers. However, the chief archivist asks me to emphasize that this is subject to the provisions of the Criminal Code, she said. This threat refers to the completely unenforceable Archives Act, which even under the absolute monarchy must have been astonishing, if it had existed at the time.

It was not permitted to obtain a copy of the documents to which one had access. Nor was it permitted to transcribe them, at least not in their entirety, and what was reproduced had to be reproduced in a distorted form. I interviewed the director of the ministry, Henrik Wölk, about this peculiar situation.

He sat in front of the red coat of arms with the three lions and the royal crown, and his way of thinking suited this backdrop perfectly. I tried to get a clear answer as to how much of the documents could actually be published.

The TV news cannot show the papers, but you are allowed to take notes from these papers, form your own impression of what they say, and, of course, explain that impression in your own words. So where is the line?

So if you can manage to transcribe the entire document, for example, do I also have the right to do so? Or would that be crossing the line? I would think so. It would be equivalent to photocopying it in the old-fashioned way. But it is difficult to say where the line is.

Shortly before, Foreign Minister Helveg Petersen had issued press releases about his policy of openness in this matter and his liberal attitude towards people who wanted to access the material.

I asked Director Wölk if we had misunderstood the whole thing. I’m afraid someone has misunderstood what has been said.

After some further wrangling, I was given access to the material, and there lay H.C. Hansen’s secret letter under the vaults of the National Archives. It looked worn, as if it had passed through many hands. H.C. Hansen and Jens Otto Krag had known about it. But Hartling and the later ministers said they had never seen it.

The incredible thing was that it had been in the Foreign Ministry’s archives all those years, while successive governments had run election campaigns on “No to nuclear weapons.” How on earth could it have disappeared? All the new heads of government were presented with the most important and secret documents.

What was inside was the truth, and I was able to read the full text to the public on the TV news 38 years after H.C. Hansen had written the words. The folder contained more interesting information. Among other things, Danish officials had agreed with the Americans on how to justify a possible nuclear accident at Thule. This made the leader of the Greenlandic Home Rule Government, Lars Emil Johansen, furious.

It is an expression and proof of the most unsympathetic part of the Danish civil service that has been in Greenland. Now, it is a little unclear whether we were even allowed to publish this document for you, even though you are the chairman of the Greenland Home Rule Government. What do you say to that? It is completely unheard of.

I mean, where in the world do you find people being exposed to risks on the basis of agreements made on their behalf by two completely different governments? And then 40 years later, they are still being kept in the dark. Even 40 years later, they are still being kept in the dark. It is a stain on the Danish Realm, and we must remove it as soon as possible.

I also read the documents that showed how the Americans had, with some justification, pressured the Danish government after the hydrogen bomb accident in 1968. The Danish government was not to make provocative statements to the press when it had such a secret nuclear agreement with the US. The US simply dictated to Denmark what to say about the accident. That was power.

And it was Deputy Foreign Minister Letty who, at one point, had whispered to me on the phone about a secret agreement that had executed the order.

In 1968, he summoned the Danish ambassador, Torben Rønne, who was read the riot act, even though he dared to protest that Denmark should be gagged about an accident for which the US bore full responsibility. A few months later, I went to the US to interview some of the key figures.

John Letty was now willing to participate, provided he could first review the new documents. I faxed them to him so that he could get his participation approved by the US State Department. When I arrived in the US, however, he had become nervous and did not want to participate after all. I took it as the whims of an old man.

Police charges

Back home, there was an envelope waiting for me, informing me that I had been charged by the police.

The US State Department had contacted the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which in turn had asked the National Archivist, Johan Peter Noack, to file a police report because I had sent the documents in question to John Letty several months after they had been published and thoroughly discussed in Denmark. At first, I thought it was a practical joke played by one of my humorous colleagues.

How could it be legal to publish something for millions of Danes, but not send it to one American? Surely it couldn’t be true that the Danish government was dancing to the tune of the US government to such an extent. However, it turned out to be true.

Niels Helveg Petersen expressed himself with great seriousness:“We received a request from the American government stating that it had discovered leaks, and it was on that basis that we contacted the National Archives.”

I had to watch myself as the main story on my own TV news program, which reported in the headlines that I had been charged under a section of the law that could result in six months in prison. One had to admit that the Americans had power. The case was both grotesque and a little serious, because Helveg Petersen and National Archivist Johan Peter Noack tried to give the public the impression that the papers I had sent to the US were not the same as those I had previously published in Denmark. Fortunately, I got hold of the National Archivist’s life insurance policy.

It was a paper he had previously written about the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ attempt to deceive him. I benefited greatly from the information in this life insurance policy when I later met with a couple of lawyers for questioning by the police, who then had to re-question Foreign Minister Henrik Wölk and Johan Peter Noack.

Chief Archivist Scheppelern prepared a four-page memo for the police in which he explained that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had not been aware that these were the same documents that had been shown on TV. Prime Minister Poul Nørup Rasmussen became involved and declared in the Folketing that it was a mistake for the National Archives to have granted access to the documents.

As the National Archives fell under the jurisdiction of Minister of Culture Jytte Hilden, she was furious about the press coverage and apparently felt that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had undermined her. I find it unfortunate that a series of events that was essentially a misunderstanding between two authorities subsequently resulted in one authority being made a scapegoat, she wrote in an internal letter to the Minister of the Interior.

The lawsuit fell apart. Of course, I enjoyed uncovering the internal squabbles, but the undisguised willingness of politicians and civil servants to use their power gave me pause for thought. How would a citizen without journalistic training have fared?

However, there was a twist to the story, as I was told that Ambassador Edward Elson, after receiving the letter from the US State Department, had thoroughly reprimanded the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and demanded action. At the same time, he instructed his press secretary to tell the press that the US had not requested that Poul be reported to the police.

Then another invitation arrived for the embassy’s annual Fourth of July party. I declined the invitation in a letter written in Danish because I did not consider the ambassador to be a gentleman on that basis. I later learned that the letter had caused quite a stir at the embassy, where Ambassador Elson had a reputation for being extremely hot-tempered and accustomed to Danes groveling before him.

Contempt for democracy

The entire existence of the Thule Base was about defending the free world. That is why it was so sad that a traditional, solid, seemingly honest, social democratic leader like H.C. Hansen chose to lie about it and that at least some of his successors followed suit. Unfortunately, however, this is a political disease in Denmark that probably arose with the defeat in 1864. We did not want to participate in World War I, but we profited greatly from it.

During World War II, the established Denmark pursued a policy of collaboration, while a very small group of losers and resistance fighters had to ensure that we were barely recognized as allies. This hypocrisy in our foreign policy continues in our EU policy, where politicians today suffer from the fact that for many years cooperation was presented solely as an economic phenomenon.

There is an almost Hamlet-like duality in our leading politicians’ approach to foreign policy, which was expressed in a comical way in the days when H.C. Hansen’s letter came to light.

While politicians tried to reveal as little as possible about Denmark’s secret nuclear policy, they made solemn speeches against France’s nuclear tests, and Prime Minister Nyrup Rasmussen forbade a section of the Life Guard Orchestra from accompanying the Queen there. The French should feel who had justice on their side.

The sick Thule workers continued to claim that their illness was caused by cleaning up after the hydrogen bomb accident. The state launched several investigations, and we were able to reveal, among other things, confusion in the records of the number of deaths and falsification of an autopsy report. Finally, the prime minister settled the matter once and for all with a huge hearing in the circus building in Copenhagen. The result was that it could not be proven that the workers’ illness had anything to do with the accident. But they and some Greenlandic prisoners were paid a sum that is probably the largest Danish compensation ever.

But perhaps what made the biggest impression during 10 years of work was the forced relocation of the Greenlanders from the Thule Air Base area. In order to make room for an expansion, the inspector and the priest were put on an American military plane in 1953 and flown to Copenhagen. When they returned, they told the Greenlandic population that they had four days to leave the place and move north. When I visited Qanak, the new Thule, myself.

I couldn’t help but notice the many Danish flags in the living rooms. There were Danish flags on the shelves, small Danish flags on the tablecloths, and Danish flags woven into the cushions. It is impossible to imagine more loyal Danish citizens than the elderly people in this town. Yet the memory of the forced relocation remained a thorn in their hearts.

Sofie Eibe looked away as she told me: “If we didn’t move within four days, our houses would be razed to the ground by bulldozers. They treated us like slaves.”

The old cattle farmer, Marcin Guac Jensen, said: “When I think back on the move, we were pushed out like dogs. Get out. Go away.”

This perception of events was miles away from what was recorded in a report led by District Court Judge Svend Sigler, who had several years to investigate the case. I sought out Svend Sigler in the palatial building of the Eastern High Court, a stone’s throw from Amalienborg Palace. There were no Danish flags here, but instead a state-authorized PH lamp on the table and legal literature on the shelves.

Sigler’s commission had concluded that the move demanded by the priest and the inspector within four days was an offer to the residents. They had an offer, and I don’t think there is any basis for saying that the Greenlanders could not have been forced back to the site.

Or could not have been forced to remain in place. There is no evidence that anything should have been enforced. There was no police presence. There were no other means of coercion. The Americans were not asked to evict them. It was astonishing.

The Danish authorities asked the Greenlanders on the small peninsula to move within four days, otherwise their houses would be razed to the ground by bulldozers. A few hundred meters away was one of the world’s largest military bases. Wasn’t that coercion? What would you call it if a Danish village were subjected to something similar?

If it is true that democracy must always be measured by how it protects the weakest, then an injustice was committed here, but it was done so that the great game of democracy could be won. However, it could well have been won with open cards and proper methods. H.C. Hansen’s secret letter and the secret nuclear policy are good examples of how Danish leaders are willing to use power in the big game. But it should preferably be done discreetly or completely covertly.

Some have argued that it is naive to demand ideals in foreign policy and that it was perfectly acceptable for a Danish prime minister to campaign against nuclear weapons while secretly allowing the US to place nuclear weapons on Danish territory. Therefore, I would like to conclude with a poem that H.C. Hansen himself wrote when he was a young man.

It goes like this:

“He is elected, he becomes great and gains power like a god. He is at odds with the happy and satisfied. He readily accepts compromises, which, at his behest, must immediately be understood as the only right thing to do.And in the moldy and stinking depths of the dustbin, you can see his quotes at the bottom. They were pretty when the excitement of election day carried him forward, but now they are basically empty.”

That was the entire section, written by Poul Brink, born in 1953, trained as a journalist in 1979, after an internship at Danmarks Radio and New Day at Lolland Falster. In 1979, he joined Østjyllands Radio, Danmarks Radio. Here, he began an in-depth investigation of the American Thule base in Greenland. In 1987, he was hired by the TV news program’s Aarhus editorial office. In 1992, he moved to the main editorial office in Copenhagen, covering environmental issues, genetic engineering, cloning, etc. Moved to the foreign desk and since 1996 has mainly covered the UK, with a focus on Tony Blair’s influence on political life. Continued TV coverage of the Thule base, awarded the Kavling Prize for this coverage in 1997.

After the US government contacted the Danish government, the police charged him with publishing classified material in the US that had previously been published in Denmark. The charges were later dropped. Most recently, he has covered the war in Afghanistan for Danmarks Radio. Please refer to Magtens Bog, the letter from Hansen.

And, as I said, this is my reading of this talented journalist Paul Brink from Magtens Bog. The section I read is called “The Bomb That Disappeared” with the subtitle “Thule Air Base in Greenland.”

And what I find interesting to note here is that there is one thing that Poul Brink does not suspect at all. And that is probably because he has not taken an interest in the Constitution. But it is the Queen’s formal power.

So he believes that it is Poul Nyrup Rasmussen who decides that the Life Guard cannot accompany the Queen on this trip to France. And it’s also a bit funny when the army is subordinate to the royal family. It is, according to the Constitution. But Paul Brink doesn’t have, how shall we say, the imagination for that.

But on the other hand, he does have, well... It’s crazy that he reveals how the Danish government is just a puppet government, and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs is a puppet ministry for the US when it comes to international politics, even when international politics takes place on Danish Greenlandic soil.

It also gives pause for thought in relation to the agreement that Denmark is about to enter into with the US, allowing the Americans to establish US military bases at Skrydstrup Air Base, Karup Air Base, and Aalborg Air Base. However, they are not allowed to have certain types of weapons. But as we can see and hear here, such things can be circumvented.

It has certainly happened before in history. So there is no guarantee that the Americans will not bring cluster bombs and nuclear bombs to Denmark, for example. I would say that this remains completely uncertain. And with that, I will conclude this reading and my commentary on the reading.

Below is a link to the original podcast I made back in 2024. It is in the Danish language.

I love interviewing Ole, as I always get blown away by the enormous amount of shocking details he is able to present us with. This time I think Ole took the prize, as he is unusually thorough in his walk-through of the faked assassination of Charlie Kirk.

And please do watch the video to the end, where Ole invites you to a BALI RETREAT in April 2026.

April 1-8 2026 - Swedish/scandinavian

use the code FLEMMING to get a 100 Euro discount

https://www.dammeguardians.com/travelbalisc

April 18-25 2026 - English language

https://www.dammeguardians.com/travelbali

If you are interested in learning more about the Jesuit wife, Erika (Frantzve) Kirk, do visit my last newsletter on the Jesuits (link below):

I recently discovered that I somehow messed up the newsletter article when I wrote it back in September 2024. Well, perhaps it is not a bad time to (re)publish it now, as another field study has just come out to prove that Bluetooth MAC addresses are indeed being emitted from the physical bodies of people who have been vaccinated against Covid-19 (and probably also in some cases from the bodies of unvaccinated people).

People inoculated with Covid-19 shots could essentially have been (nano)chipped in the process

Back in the late 2020, conspiracy theorists were quick to claim that Covid-19 vaccines would insert a computer chip into the body of the person being vaccinated. However, this was not believed by many at the time, and it was never documented.

Actually the claim of a microchip being injected with the vaccines gave the mainstream cohorte a great opportunity to mock these silly conspiracy theorists.

But, even though no one were able to prove that chips were injected through the vaccines, it was subsequently claimed that the mRNA vaccines contained the microscopic building blocks that was able - under the right conditions - to form a self-assembled intracorporal nanonetwork, enabling intra-body-to-outside-world-communication.

Now that last claim was surprisingly substantiated in the summer of 2024. Against a lot of garble from the scientific community this study still stands scientifically-wise undisputed.

This scientific and peer-reviewed study by physician Young Mi Lee from the Republic of Korea and professor Daniel Broudy from Japan, has confirmed that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contains nanotechnology that are showing self-assembly behaviour in a human-body-like culture. The study was released on July 18th 2024 on the portal of International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (link to study).

After receiving death threats, it appears that Daniel Broudy is no longer actively participating in the discussion on the topic and the related issues it has raised.

Dr. John Campbell provides a brief video review of the study.

In this newsletter you can watch a mirrored video from Dr. John Cambells YouTube channel from July 2024 that explains the main outline of this new scientific study. You used to be able to watch the original video HERE but it was of course coming too close to the truth, so it was taken down by YouTube!

The main content of the study can be summed up:

In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous — on the order of 3~4 x 106 per milliliter of the injectable — visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 µm, or greater, of many different shapes.

There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them.

All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables, and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures.

As time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions.

They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains.

Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time.

Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.

Dr. Young Mi Lee, Jeju, Jejudo, 63098, Republic of Korea (South Korea)

Professor Daniel Broudy, Okinawa Christian University, Japan

The study even shows that electromagnetic radiation could enhance the process of self-assembling.

Where can I find the study?

Go to the landing page of the new study on the “International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research” and find the study HERE!

Also you can find the study in PDF-format HERE!

Alternatively you can even find and download the study in PDF-format HERE!

This study could (unfortunately) support my tests back in April 2023

Back on the 10th of April 2023 I did a test in a park near Copenhagen where I showed that inoculated people emitted Bluetooth MAC Address signals from within the body. I did several other test with the same results.

My tests were explained in the video “Do vaccinated people emit Bluetooth signals?”, where I also explained how people could do the test by themselves. Watch the video below:

IMPORTANT NOTE TO ABOVE VIDEO:I state in the video that if you do your own field study, you need to keep away for more than 100 meters from possible sources of interference. I have later found out that these Bluetooth emission can propogate over flat terrain up to, and possibly beyond, 1000 meters. Please keep this in mind if are doing your own study. The scanners usually have distance measurements included, and even though they often are quite inaccurate, they do provide a lot of help in determining whether there are unwanted ambient BLE (Bluetooth Low Emission) MAC signals interfering with the field study.

Back then I asked the question: “Could it be true that the vaccinated part of the population was chipped in the process?”

As a qualified radio communication engineer, I had felt urged to carry out some field studies to investigate whether the Covid-19 vaccinated people actually were radiating Bluetooth MAC addresses, just like it was shown in the BlueTRUTH video by COMUSAV. This video is a MUST-SEE, so you can find the BlueTRUTH video by COMUSAV below:

At the end, back in 2023, I concluded that the probability of this ‘phenomenon’ was very high, but I was unable to do a scientific study, without investing a lot of time, and a lot of money that I did not have. So I have had the subject lying on the shelf for a while, making occasional tests and observations.

So how can this self-assembling intracorporal nanorouting network possibly come to work?

Graphene oxide in the vaccines

Graphene oxide is believed to be essential for the process of self-assembly of the nanoparticles. You can find more information on the subject of graphene oxide in the vials on my good friend Claire Edward’s homepage.

Also La Quinta Columna in Spain have collected a lot of the information and science in this field, which can be found HERE (choose 'english' in top menu of the landing page).

It still remains to be scientifically proven by peer-reviewed studies that the Covid-19 vaccines actually installs a full nanorouting intracorporal network in the body or other sources of inserting components to the body is needed. However, with these different reports serving scientific proof of self-assembly nanotechnolocy, I fear our worst nightmare might be on the way, if a strong ressistance is not put up!

The vaccines could have provided some of the essential components for a self-assembling intracorporal nanorouting network capable of communicating with the outside world using Bluetooth MAC addresses via a wireless Bluetooth protocol.

Flemming Blicher, radio and telecommunications engineer, MBA

Pseudonym “Mik Anderson” documents how all the technology for intracoporal nanorouting is already available

Under the pseudonym “Mik Anderson” a video surfaced some time ago, which gives an overview of all the technology and scientific studies, that are currently available to make it possible for the deployment of a self-assembly intracorporal nanonetwork. Se link below:

“Mik Andersen” also provided af PDF-report with a brief presentation of all the key points. Download the PDF-presentation HERE!

For further information on the Bluetooth MAC Address ‘phenomenon’ please watch MD and PhD Ana Maria Mihalcea’s interview with Dr. Pedro Chavez of COMUSAV from july 2024.

Fast forward to December 2025: Yet more proof of Bluetooth MAC addresses - And a remedy!

As stated in the beginning of this newsletter I have just learned that I new scientific field study has been released. In this study they not only confirm the findings of Bluetooth MAC addresses in inoculated people, but also serves proof of a remedy.

I will discuss this field study in a newsletter soon to come. Dont forget to subscribe so you can have the newsletter send directly to your inbox when it is published!

After 80 years with local and regional outbreaks of limited warfare, the World is heading for World War III after US attacked Iran on the evening of Saturday 21st of June (US time).

United Nations was founded on the basis that a future World War could be avoided. Unfortunately it appears as if the UN is about to loose it’s very foundation as the peace keeper of the World. For the record I have had the UN blue baret on myself from 1992-93 serving as a UN military police sergeant with the UNFICYP mission in Cyprus. It did not take me long after landing in Cyprus to establish that UN wasn’t peacekeeping, but instead keeping af war-like condition between the Greek and the Turkish side in Cyprus. And the UN did not seem to mind, was what I concluded myself back then.

But it wasn’t until 2020 that I actually came to a somewhat reasonable understanding of why UN wasn’t functioning the way it was trying to portray it was functioning. I am thankful for the globalist induced corona pandemic (declared by WHO, a UN subsidiary) as it let me to research the bigger picture of geopolitics. For 5 years I have spent the lions share of my time trying to understand the world around me. Therefore, I hope you either know this on beforehand, or are willing to let some facts sink in and let yourself be a tad bit more educated than what the educational system and mainstream medie have ‘indulged’ you in.

Seymour Hersh predicted the US attack on Iran

An American investigative journalist, political writer and receiver of several awards, Seymour Hersh, just predicted the US attack several days in advance of the attack.

Seymour Hersh was also one of the few journalist which actually spoke openly about how the US had sabotaged the Nordstream gas pipeline off the coast of Denmark’s esternmost island, Bornholm.

Even though it was quite obvious from the beginning that it wasn’t Russia who had sabotaged it’s own property (who would have thought of that?) Seymour Hersh used all his military intelligence contacts - a network that has taken him all of his professionel career to develop and maintain - and laid the facts of this sabotage out to open discussions, which the mainstream medias’ journalists never did.

Since the Nordstream sabotage I have kept an eye on Seymour Hersh’ Substack newsletter and I urge you to do the same (sign up HERE!). On Thursday June the 19th I read, and reread, an article newsletter from Hersh, where he states that the information he was getting from his elaborate intelligence network was, that the US was preparing to launch a strike on Iran much sooner than anyone else was expecting, probably as soon as the (then) oncoming weekend. You can read the newsletter below:

Why I imediately thought Hersh’ predictions made sense

Besides this prediction coming from a well-established investigative journalist I had other reasons to presume that Hersh could be right.

1. British Member of Parliament Andrew Bridgen had already in May 2024 stated, that we were de facto at war with Russia without any politician admitting to it!

As can be seen from the below video from May 12th 2024, the British MP Andrew Bridgen was not shy of telling the public that Britain (and Denmark and other NATO countries) were already at war with Russia, a fact I had myself stated in some of my (Danish) newsletters from May and June 2024.

2. A US war with Iran was predicted by US (retired) four-star general Wesley Clark in 2007

War with Iran was predicted by retired US (retired) four-star general (highest rank in the US military!) Wesley Clark in 2007, based on a Pentagon memo that stated in black and white that the US would go to war with 7 states in 5 years. (see video link below)

3. The Oligarchy want to control the World by starting wars

Furthermore, it is the plan of the oligarchs and globalists to use military conflicts to usurp even more power over the world's growing population. This can be seen, for example between the lines in sections 1.4.3 and 1.4.4 in Klaus Schwab's book from June 2020 “COVID-19 The Great Reset” where wars are some of the instabilities mentioned in the book. (read the book online by tapping below picture of the books front cover):

4. Any (even partly) successful politician in the World today is merely a puppet

Anyway, to think the puppet politicians like Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump or even Iran’s leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is doing what they do because they believe they are serving the public (as opposed to doing it for favours from the oligarchy in return) is probably hard for most of the people, when they understand that ‘Bibi’s son Yair Netanyahu is living the cosy life in Florida. See below postcard with love from Florida (it’s of course fake, but it’s the truth that Yair lives in Florida as opposed to participate in the zionists struggle to slaughter the Palestinians - see THIS Miami NT article):

So Seymour Hersh’ intelligence added to a lot of background info which is why I recorded a video on Friday 20th of June. I did it in my native language Danish, but I have included English subtitles (see my Danish nesletter HERE!). It is the same video that accompanies this newsletter.

Which ‘God’ is Trump asking to bless the Middle East and the US?

In US President Donald Trump’s address in Washington on Saturday evening about the lauch of strikes against Iran, he finishes the 3 minutes war propaganda speech by asking for Gods protection. The three and a half minute speech can be seen below:

But which ‘god’ is Trump acutally referring to?

Trump being part of the globalist political elite - which are puppets for the Oligarchy - are not referring to the same god as you probably think he is referring to.

The god of the globalists is what most informed and sane human beings would actually call ‘Satan’ or ‘the Devil’. The real belief of the Oligarchy is based on an Old Testament - Babylonian - Phoenician - Greek - Roman - Freemasonic range of satanic gods.

To establish a base for such foundations I had to write a 480 pages large book “The Three Fictions”, which unfortunately has not yet been translated into the English language. However, you can start listening to the precursor for this book, which I have actually translated into English and published (at least in part) as a podcast. (click HERE to listen to my English podcast with readings from my book)

Emulation of a World War III

When I say that the oligarchs want to emulate World War III, I mean that it won't be a full-scale nuclear war where the major powers will throw most of their nuclear arsenals at each other. Instead, it is a notion that is being planted in people's heads (via the media and politicians) that World War III has begun, or that the precursor to it has started, and that we must constantly fear that nuclear bombs will land everywhere, whether we are in Denmark, Spain, South Africa or North America, or almost any other country. Unfortunately, many people will still die in this scenario, so I'm not disparaging the prospect of a world war. I'm just saying that the oligarchs are not so stupid as to destroy their own assets by letting the whole world go up in a nuclear inferno.

I share the above point with one of my dear colleagues here on Substack.

Meet the dear Frances Leader

I have found other friends and good sources of information than Seymour Hersh. One of my preferred other Substack friends is Frances Leader. This dear woman in her best age has fought for humanity nearly her whole time on Earth.

Also Frances Leader was fast to comment on the US-Iran war. Earlier today (June 22nd) she wrote another one of her down-to-earth common sense well-written articles. Please find the below qoutation from her recent newsletter named “AND NOW TO WAR” :

There are no winners among us.

Those who succeed in times of war are well prepared and keeping a good distance from it. They find ways to justify their withdrawal to safe spaces. They consider themselves superior to it, even though they are the manipulators of it.

They believe that their action is warranted. For them, war is the quickest route to personal salvation on a planet with finite resources. It is an essential thinning of the herd. A herd of humans which they fear may rise up and annihilate them and their inheritance.

For thousands of years they have performed this ritual culling. They are expert at war games. It is peace that they cannot quite grasp. They have no experience of peace and, therefore, peace is beyond their creative abilities.

Peace is even beyond their imagination.

Frances Leader on Substack

You can read the full article with the title below:

Please do support both Seymour Hersh and Frances Leader by subscribing to their Substack newsletters, either as a free subscriber or even as a paid one, if you are able to spare a few quid a month!

The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication.

If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):

It is hard to know the exact truth behind Queen Margrethe II’s decision to step down from the Danish throne back in January 2024. But it’s a sheer fact that she did so shortly after engaging in self-executing contracts with InPower’s Danish NOL-senders.

The abdicated Queen is already many millions of US dollars down in her calculated net worth, since she (involuntarily) got involved with InPower Movements Notice of Liability’s framework.

Now she has left the throne, with all of it’s shenanigans, to her son King Frederik X.

One important video to watch!

Watch Josh Del Sol’s “Take Back Your Power” on below YouTube-link, which explains the (Smart Meter) background on how and why InPower Movement was created:

Below snapshots of the Danish Trespassing Technology (Smart Meter) NoL - of which the Danish Queen became a receiver of (which is called ‘respondent’) towards the end of 2023.

Turning the tables on The Deep State

InPowers NoL-process is about turning the tables to stop the ruling elite from exploiting the people.

Cal Washington explains in this interview how this could be done. The more people who joins, the faster the process will go. InPower is worldwide, so if you don’t see your flag, it is probably time to do something about it in your country. - Don’t you think? :)

World famous researcher shares his view on Trump

Ole Dammegard is world famous for his research into the murder of John F. Kennedy and Swedish primeminister Olof Palme, 9/11 and nearly all the other conspiracies you can think of.

With Trump recently releasing “the JFK murder files” I saw the perfect opportunity to pick Ole’s brain on the Trump-subject! - And to interogate him a bit on the bigger picture! ;-)

Interview topics:

* Intro to Ole Dammegaard

* JFK murder files

* The Big Picture 2025

* From JFK to Trump

* Assasination attempts on Trump have helped him taking office

* Trump, Musk, Vance and Theil - Silicon Valley takes over!

* Danish Tech Ambassador is the Danish Silicon Valley connection

* Who's Putin? A look towards Russia

* WHERE’S THE COUNTER-RESISTANCE?

* Support for Ole Dammegard

The day I killed JFK

Ole Dammegard has been instrumental in getting the truth out about who actually gave John F. Kennedy the killing shot on 22nd of November 1863. It was James Files who shot JFK, and he did so with a mercury bullet, which is the scientific proof.

Ole has interviewed James Files and sanity-tested all Files’ pivotal points. Ole’s extensive work on the JFK murder has prompted James Files to recently send Ole the following Thank-you Note:

Watch James Files explain the details of the day he killed JFK in below YouTube-video:

Dont forget to support Ole Dammegard by donations on below link:

Links:

The official Trump-release of the JFK assassination files:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2025

J.D. Vance video on visiting Greenland:https://www.berlingske.dk/usa/jd-vance-besoeger-groenland-paa-fredag

Meet the Danish Tech Ambassador:https://techamb.um.dk/team/meet-the-ambassador

Memorandum of understanding from 2018 between WEF and ‘GoD’:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VeHypi50IQMydBvVro5BGjKrQOnzP36a/view?usp=sharing

Putin’s connected to the USA through Stasi Spy (in Danish):https://frihedsbrevet.dk/stasi-spion-og-sanktionsramt-forretningsmand-her-er-putins-mystiske-bindeled-til-usa/

Ole Dammegard is world famous for his research into JFK, Olof Palme, 9/11 and nearly all the conspiracies you can think of.

With Trump recently releasing “the JFK murder files” I saw the perfect opportunity to pick Ole’s brain on the the Trump-subject! - And the bigger picture!

Interview topics:

* Intro to Ole Dammegaard

* JFK murder files

* The Big Picture 2025

* From JFK to Trump

* Assasination attempts on Trump have helped him taking office

* Trump, Musk, Vance and Theil - Silicon Valley takes over!

* Danish Tech Ambassador is the Danish Silicon Valley connection

* Who's Putin? A look towards Russia

* WHERE’S THE COUNTER-RESISTANCE?

* Support for Ole Dammegard

The day I killed JFK

Ole Dammegard has been instrumental in getting the truth out about who gave JFK the killing shot with a mercury bullet. He has interviewed James Files and sanity-tested all Files’ pivotal points, prompting James to send Ole af thank-you-note:

Watch James Files explain the details of the day he killed JFK in below YouTube-video:

Dont forget to support Ole Dammegard by donations on below link:

Links:

The official Trump-release of the JFK assasination files:https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release-2025

J.D. Vance video on visiting Greenland:https://www.berlingske.dk/usa/jd-vance-besoeger-groenland-paa-fredag

Meet the Danish Tech Ambassador:https://techamb.um.dk/team/meet-the-ambassador

Memorandum of understanding from 2018 between WEF and ‘GoD’:https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VeHypi50IQMydBvVro5BGjKrQOnzP36a/view?usp=sharing

Putin’s connected to the USA through Stasi Spy (in Danish):https://frihedsbrevet.dk/stasi-spion-og-sanktionsramt-forretningsmand-her-er-putins-mystiske-bindeled-til-usa/

Watch the second part of this interview here:

When the current crisis in Ukraine started in 2014, NATO did intervene by aiding Ukrainian forces in their military offensive against the uprising in Donbass by russian-oriented ukrainians. In 2014 the Secretary General of NATO was Anders Fogh Rasmussen, a former prime minister of Denmark.

NATO has been heavily involved in Ukraine since the USA-backed coup that happened on the backdrop of the Maidan-revolution in 2014.

How did USA and NATO get involved? Well, that probably goes a long way back. However, there is no doubt that the Obama/Biden administration was the puppet master when the future destiny of Ukraine was inacted: War with Russia!

Read the former newsletter from me below, where you get a much fuller picture than mainstream media bothers to give you:

Double standards by then Head of NATO

The short clip from an TV-interview from 2014 shows then Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen being reluctant to admit that the NATO he was in charge of, was supporting a Ukrainian regime, full of neo-nazi elements.

Interviewer: Okay, so let me rephrase the question.Does it bother you that you're training people who may be working with neo-Nazis?

Ander Fogh: No, we don't. We don't.

Interviewer: USA Today did a big report on the Azov Battalion, 900 members strong. Their symbol is borrowed from the Waffen SS. They're on the front line of the fighting.

Anders Fogh: Yeah. We don't cooperate with Nazis. Let me stress that.

Interviewer: Okay, does that bother you that there are groups with neo-Nazi insignias fighting on the front line?

Anders Fogh: What bothers me is the Russian propaganda.

Interviewer: Okay, but the Russian propaganda, USA Today, last time I checked, was not a Russian propaganda. It was an American center-right newspaper.

Anders Fogh: Yeah, but let me stress once again, we do not cooperate with Nazis.

(full transcript of the video is a feature that can be viewed by all subscribers on Substack)

The referred article in USA Today is not available on this medias homepage today. Facts like this raises questions like: “Is information like this deliberately being deleted from the internet by media outlets like USA Today?”

Watch the original interview on the below YouTube link (4min39sec):

But how did the US install their own choice of Government?

Geopolitics are not an easy subject to embark on, if one has not been interested in “the big picture” before. In such a case it can be a help, that a professor of economics, independant researcher and founder of a globalization research centre, comes to the rescue.

Meet professor Michel Chossudovsky - Founder of the Centre for Research on Globalization (GRC)

About Michel Chossudovsky:

Michel Chossudovsky is an award-winning author, Professor of Economics (emeritus) at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), Montreal, Editor of Global Research. He has undertaken field research in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific and has written extensively on the economies of developing countries with a focus on poverty and social inequality. He has also undertaken research in Health Economics (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), UNFPA, CIDA, WHO, Government of Venezuela, John Hopkins International Journal of Health Services (1979, 1983) He is the author of 13 books including The Globalization of Poverty and The New World Order (2003), America’s “War on Terrorism” (2005), The Globalization of War, America’s Long War against Humanity (2015). He is a contributor to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. His writings have been published in more than twenty languages. In 2014, he was awarded the Gold Medal for Merit of the Republic of Serbia for his writings on NATO’s war of aggression against Yugoslavia. He can be reached at crgeditor@yahoo.com

Michel Chossudovsky has written a very extensive article on the coup that happened in Ukraine without Western medias putting focus on it. Let’s turn back the clocks to 2014 and read what professor Chossudovsky was saying in 2014:

We are dealing with a coalition government (integrated by two neo-Nazi parties) which is supported by “Western democracy” and the “international community”.

According to the New York Times,

“The United States and the European Union have embraced the revolution here as another flowering of democracy, a blow to authoritarianism and kleptocracy in the former Soviet space.” ( After Initial Triumph, Ukraine’s Leaders Face Battle for Credibility, NYTimes.com, March 1, 2014, emphasis added)

“Flowering Democracy, Revolution”? The grim realities are otherwise. What is a stake is a US-EU-NATO sponsored coup d’Etat in blatant violation of international law.

The forbidden truth is that the West has engineered –through a carefully staged covert operation– the formation of a proxy regime integrated by Neo-Nazis.

Confirmed by Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, key organizations in the Ukraine including the Neo-Nazi party Svoboda were generously supported by Washington: “We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. … We will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.”

The Western media has casually avoided to analyze the composition and ideological underpinnings of the government coalition. The word “Neo-Nazi” is a taboo. It has been excluded from the dictionary of mainstream media commentary. It will not appear in the pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post or The Independent. Journalists have been instructed not to use the term “Neo-Nazi” to designate Svoboda and the Right Sector.

Read the full article HERE!

But this version of ‘what has been going on in Ukraine between 2014-2022’ are being suppressed, maybe conveniently so that we all can focus on, is hating on Putin, instead of understanding the bigger picture, namely: All politicians are puppets and the real puppet masters are all hiding from the public and letting us (belligerent) watch the horror-show the politician-puppets produce for us.

Is it this simple? We are all being lied to (nearly) all of the time, both by Western and Russian, and all other, medias!

And finally, don't forget to support my work if you'd like to see more from me:

I spend a lot of time in libraries, searching the internet and liasing with other truth-seekers, and to send you valuable worth-your-time newsletters.

The Danish Illusion is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):

Well, the above video-snip is from the World Economic Forums Davos meeting in 2023 featuring Nita Farahany from Duke University. You can watch her full presentation here:

https://www.weforum.org/videos/davos-am23-ready-for-brain-transparency-english/

Fast forward to DAVOS 2025

WEF is now openly talking about torturing people and implanting fake memories to mind control people! Watch Nita Farahany comment below from Davos 2025.

The described scenario by Nita Farahany is actually a level above what was seen in the 2002 blockbuster Minority Report by Steven Spielberg starring Tom Cruise.

For other great news (though only from a globalist’s perspective”) from this years WEF meeting at Davos, go to WEF homepage HERE.

You can find the signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) HERE!

Isn’t it interesting that Anne Marie Engtoft Meldgaard became the Tech Ambassador mentioned in the MoU, and that she was working within the WEF organisation until she was made the first Tech Ambassador for Denmark? Since taken office in 2020 she has headed the 18 man strong organisation, with most of the team, including herself, sitting in Silicon Valley.

Public-private partnership (PPP or GPPP) is the modern-day corruption used by the filthy-rich elite to control our politicians!

You can read the actual signed MoU below:

Below you can find an earlier newsletter regarding WEF:

If you feel like supporting my work, please ‘buy me a coffee’. (link)

Three days old news regarding threats from Russia seems not to bother Western medias much. The World is on the brink of war, while Western leaders are acting with total complacency,

Why are almost nobody concerned that World War Three is about to launch in the worst full-fledged fashion, with direct military confrontations between Russia and US/NATO?

Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spelled it out in capital letters and warned that the opening of US missile base in Poland could trigger Russian attacks. Needless to say that the US went ahead and opened the base in Poland on the 13th of November.

On the day of the Russian threats (21/11), all the big Western mainstream media outlets ran the story. Here is just a few examples of these articles: New York Post, The Mirror, Reuters, and The Telegraph.

Total ignorance seems to be the answer from the West

Despite the serious nature of the Russian threats, the ignorance is total from Western side.

Russian measures includes updating their nuclear doctrin. Russia also recently fired an intercontinental ballistic missile at Dnipro city along with eight other missiles.

The attack comes two days after Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a revised nuclear doctrine that formally lowers the threshold for the country’s use of nuclear weapons. Ukraine on Tuesday fired several American-supplied longer-range missiles and reportedly fired U.K.-made Storm Shadows on Wednesday into Russia.

Watch the below analysis by Peak Prosperity (American anti-neocon organisation with more than half a million subscribers on YouTube). This video claims that a possible intermediate-range ballistic (IRBM) attack with new Oreshnik missile was lanched by Russia:

World’s gone 100% crazy, World leaders playing poker with the World’s population at stake, risking a NUCLEAR WAR!

The WEF's connections to Denmark are manifold. Pretty well all the Danish prime ministers in recent times have been affiliated with the WEF and both the then Crown Prince, now King Frederik 10. and his wife Queen Mary, have long been part of the ‘Young Global Leaders’ programme of the WEF. Despite the posh competition it is still the bilderberger Ida Auken, who admittedly ranks as the greatest advocate for the WEF in Denmark. She wrote - allegedly herself - an article in 2016, which was published on the WEF's website and on social media. What made the article famous or infamous if you like, was the infamous words that have now got an entrenched reputation: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy”. The original article can be found on the Wayback Machine, as Ida Auken herself, or the WEF, or both together first ‘edited’ the article and then later completely removed it from the website. I do wonder why? Both happened at the start of 2021, when the corona-pandemic, according to later statements from Ida Auken, made ‘conspiracy theorists’ mix her predictions together with ‘The Great Reset’.

As you would expect, she has never explained why the article has been removed, and this fact alone is worthy of my further attention, later. In the edited article it can be seen that the WEF, or Ida Auken herself, or both, has done some damage control and attempted to dumb the article down, for example by changing the title from “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better” to the less controversial “Here's how life could change in my city by the year 2030”. Auken's original article was reprinted by Forbes on 10th November 2016, so fortunately it can also be found there. You can also still find the launch page of WEFs “Eight Predictions for the World” on their official website, where Ida Auken's article was the first of the eight predictions for the world. Interestingly enough, if you click on Ida's article, you will see that it is no longer on the website. It has simply been deleted, almost certainly because of growing criticism and mounting ridicule. However, you can still view Ida Auken's “Own nothing, be happy” statement in the launch video at the bottom of the page.

The WEF removed a post on social media of which the video was part, supposedly because it went viral with negative comments about the WEF. It is interesting to realise that these eight predictions, which allegedly should have been done by eight different contributors, seems to have been coordinated quite accurately with the goals which the WEF is still working towards, now, seven years later. Either the WEF has been unbelievably lucky using accurate fortune tellers, like Ida Auken, to contribute in 2016, or it was paid work, or at the very least carefully coordinated and planned contributions from Ida Auken and the other seven. Ida Auken was at the time part of the WEF's Global Future Councils, and it is possible that the seven other writers were too. This could explain how well coordinated their future tellings were. On the day of the opening of the Danish Parliament, Folketinget, on 4th October 2022, I met Ida Auken in front of Christiansborg (the parliament building). I asked her how great the influence on Danish politics the WEF has. "Nothing!" she says and shortly after, she says the same thing about the Bilderberg group. Then I asked her the question “then, why is she part of both organisations, if they do not have any influence on Danish politics”? To this she answers that she is part of both because she can have influence on the organisations in order for her to make them do something for the climate! This is a strange backward logic that Ida is making use of here. Why would she spend time on organisations which, according to herself, have no influence on a country like Denmark? These people just lie, and lie and lie. In fact, it reminds one of the oft quoted phrase; How does one know when a politician (or, in this case a spokesperson for the WEF) is lying? The answer, of course is, when their lips are moving.

It is also slightly strange that Ida Auken had to travel to the WEF and Bilderberger meetings, and then just fire away some random points about the climate, whereby she gains influence on the climate area. Which then, after all, as she maintains, has no influence on Denmark, and therefore, I guess, not on any other country either? Unless, of course, if it was the case that all other countries are so helplessly far behind Denmark that they learn a lot from Ida Auken’s utterances about the climate. Who knows what is going on in the head of Ida Auken? I cannot fathom the logic. You can view the short interview with Ida 19 minutes and 30 seconds in a YouTube video “Folketingets åbning 4. oktober 2022” on my YouTube-kanal (it's in Danish). What is the reason that the WEF and Ida Auken do not stand by their article from 2016? Is this about that there are too many critics, who have seen right through it all and realised that the WEF is a great proponent to support that the world should go through a great reset and thereafter introduce a one world government? And also that this collaboration between global institutions like the EU, UN, WHO, NATO, the World Bank institutions and many more are not playing with open cards with the world's population?

Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better

(the original quotation from the first Ida Auken-article)

During the Danish election for parliament in 2022, TjekDet (the Danish fact-checker organisation) found that they had to fact-check the leader of a new Danish political party Pernille Vermund. This new party is called ‘Nye Borgerlige’. Pernille Vermund made a post on social media that had criticised the WEF for seeking to assume the right to own property from people, on the back of Ida Aukens article. TjekDet made supposed 'experts' comment on the post in order for them to make a concerted negative fact-check of Pernille Vermund. What they did not do, which was a major journalistic blunder, was to ask the WEF. However TjekDet believe themselves to have the ammunition they need to shut Pernille Vermund down. These fact-checkers are nothing more than self-elected judges of opinion and I deem them utterly revolting. This is especially heinous considering that Danish tax payers have paid millions for their services; voicing the false narrative of the globalists, twisting and falsifying their fact-checks. Regarding this specific fact-check, Ida Auken herself was an 'expert witness' but was not even asked, which makes the whole affair even more dodgy. There are several links to her article, however not the original one from WEF's website. But on the WayBack Machine you can find copies - and TjekDet seem not in the least concerned as to why the article, that their 'fact-check' is about, is no longer on the website of the WEF where it was first published!

So it is clear to see that all this is not of any interest to TjekDet, who must have fallen into a deep journalistic slumber while they were in the process of their 'fact-check'! I think that TjekDet has, once more, contributed to a taxpayers money consuming, globalist agenda pushing, brain washing and misguiding article!

Another globalist-friendly media Politi-fact did a fact check in English, as did Reuters and at lot of other fact-check medias. All of them totally obfuscating simple facts and adding total confusion to the mix.

Globalistic Social Liberalism

Ida Auken's bare-faced cheek that she uses to massage the globalistic social liberalism into the minds of the population, leaves me disgusted. It seems to only spellbind a fast falling number of the population, falling as the total population slowly begin to realise how these actor politicians are caught in the game of the globalist marionette theatre. I wonder, if politicians, like Ida Auken, know that they are being played? I sometimes wonder even more, because she sometimes plays her part so well, as the politician who wants a lot of good things for her country and for the climate. I further wonder that, if she is so into playing her part, she actually believes in the spin herself? It would be truly frightening, if that were the case.

Founder of WEF, Klaus Schwab, is more direct in his communication:

Links:

* Wayback Machine’s copy of Ida Auken’s original WEF article regarding owing nothing but being happy: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125135500/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is

* Wayback Machine’s copy of Ida Auken’s edited WEF article (later it was completely erased): https://web.archive.org/web/20210427224934/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/

* Magasinet Forbes also made a copy of Auken’s original article on the 10th of November, 2016: https://www.forbes.com/sites/worldeconomicforum/2016/11/10/shopping-i-cant-really-remember-what-that-is-or-how-differently-well-live-in-2030/

* WEF’s homepage when launching “8 predictions for the world” on Wayback Machine.: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125144156/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030

* TjekDet fact-check of Pernille Vermund on the 27th of October, 2022, regarding WEF: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/pernille-vermund-vaekker-konspirationsteoretikerne-midt-i-valgkampen

* PolitiFact fact-check on Ida Auken’s statements and WEF “World Economic Forum “elites” are pushing the Great Reset, which aims to control people by taking all their possessions.”: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/28/instagram-posts/world-economic-forum-elites-are-pushing-the-great/

WARNING: Irony and sarcasm galore!

“As a result of the brutal massacre on the 7th of October, the Gaza Arabs lost the right to be here (Gaza) ever”

Quote by Israeli settler

The Israeli settlers are moving in, and the Gaza Arabs are being pushed out. The pan-Israeli-Palestinian political product, called Hamas, has served its purpose since 2007. Know all Arab Palestinian can take the blame for the atrocities of Hamas actions of the 7th of October.

Should there be any Arab incumbents left, the Israel Lanius drones (developed by the feted Elbit Systems company of Israel) will surely take care of thy infidels:

This is all greatly (however ironically and sarcastically) in line with the demonstration in the centre of Copenhagen a month ago, where the below flyer was handed out:

…and this flyer as well:

So now it seems that, as soon as Ukraine has cleaned up Russia, and proxy-american Israeli troops has conquered Lebanon, Syria and Iran, Bibi’s wettest dream has come into fruition!

In fact, we might be on the road to a One World Government, with a One World Religion, created by our benevolent world banking cartel, controlled via Rome (spiritually), City of London (financially) and Washington D.C. (militarily).

Peace out! - Just remember to take the shots, put on a mouth-diaper and obey the totalitarian fascistic regime no matter what- AND ALL WILL BE GOOD!!

Humorous-Fascist-Socialist-Wokeist-Totalitarian Think Tank

HUFASOWT is a Danish Think Tank that has recently seen the light of day. It's called: "Humorous-Fascist-Socialist-Wokeist-Totalitarian Think Tank, or just HUFASOWT. The main slogan of the think tank is Constructive Fascism! But there are many other good slogans to choose from, as per below:

Gulag and KZ were childs play! Just wait for the new FEMA-like camps!

A One World Government can solve all the problems!

More transhumanism in Schools!

More Satanism in the Churches!

Globalism reduces CO2!

Zionism solves all problems, in particularly in the Middle East!

Sudden Death is just a normal and Passing Phenomenon, and probably nothing to do with the vaccines!

The Royal House of Denmark loves you!

The Globalists, the Parliaments of the World and all the Royal Houses of the World loves you too!

Stay Woke - Vote!

Earlier newsletters from this channel:

Here is what he writes about Zelensky in a X/Twitter post:

The King Is Naked!

BOMBSHELL ALLEGATIONS

This man will go down in history as the person who destroyed his own country for fame and fortune.

This man will go down in history as first-class crook, of which there have been many in history.

In 2019, Zelensky was elected on an overwhelming mandate to make peace with Russia.

Zelensky committed too many crimes and betrayed his people. He deserved Hitler's fate.

(from X/Twitter profile @ivan_8848)

The video is narrated by the former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter (link to his homepage HERE!).

The same Scott Ritter that I wrote about in the below newsletter some days ago:

The same Scott Ritter

72 minutes to wipe out the World

I dont know about you, but I am a bit uncomfortable with this globalist millionaire og billionaire at the helm of a country that has tried to provoke Russia into war since 2014. Ukraine finally succeeded in 2022, when Putin started what he called a special military operation.

The same X/Twitter profile has shared another video with Scott Ritter where he is being interviewed to the German media Gegenpol. In this interview he is not gentle with the Germans, but his bollocking does not stop with the Germans. It counts for all other Western countries as well. Stop supporting a hopeless war in Ukraine and start talking about peace with Russia. Or else things might escalate into a nuclear war!

Here’s the description of that same video interview from a post from the said X/Twitter profile:

MUST WATCH AND SHARE ‼️ ‼️ ‼️

72 MINUTES BEFORE THE COMPLETE EXTINCTION OF THE PLANET

Scott Ritter Interview for Gegenpol

Germany must take the initiative and propose a new arms control program to Europe.

Germany must remove Zelensky from power to prevent a nuclear war.

Germany and NATO must stop considering the possibility of Russia's military defeat.

Russia is not a threat to Germany and NATO.

Germany must stop discussing defeating Russia.

China has announced a serious increase in its threat level.

The German Navy sent two ships through the Taiwan Strait.

This happened in not international waters, raising questions about their legitimacy.

China could have sunk the German ships, but did not.

Germany is no longer a military power and has no right to project power.

China may stop cooperating with Germany, which will lead to economic and political problems.

Germany must rethink its policies and become a strong leader in the economic and diplomatic spheres.

(from X/Twitter profile @ivan_8848)

Lars Løkke Rasmussen wants Russia to leave all Ukrainian territory as it looked in 2014, before Kyiv started a civil war against its own Russian-Ukrainian population.

Does the Minister want back the Kyiv-killing of civilians in Donbass from 2014-2022?

Have they all forgotten the leaked phonecall in 2014 between the US Undersecretary of State, Victoria Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Pyatt?

Is so, here it is AGAIN:

Please note that Victory Nuland’s family escaped the Russian pogroms in Ukraine back in the 19th century and fled to the US, while changing their family name fra Nudelmann to Nuland. That woman has an inate hate for all Russians, which is not justified so many years after the pogroms back in the 19th century.

Have they all forgotten how the US since 2014 have tried so hard to make the war in Ukraine a proxy-war, where the US could fight Russia through the Kyiv puppet regime?

Have all the Nordic countries, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland and Denmark forgotten what have happened in Donbass since 2014?

Etnic cleansing of Russian-Ukrainians between 2014 and 2022

Does Lars Løkke Rasmussen want back the ethnic cleansing by the Kyiv regime, that was documented in the “Donbass Documentary” by Sorbonne-lecturer and filmmaker Anne-Laure Bonnel in 2015/2016?

Watch the scary Donbass documentary and get a better understanding why Russia intervened in Donbass in 2022 after 8 years of Kyiv slaughtering of russo-ukrainians (or try this link HERE!):

At the US-UK meeting on Friday the 13th of September 2024 in the White House in Washington, the decision to provoke an ‘escalating all-out nuclear war’ was narrowingly close.

But fortunately, in the last minute, President Biden did not agree and DID NOT sign Keir Starmers documents to transfer target list data to the Storm Shadow missiles. Storm Shadow is the name of the missiles the UK has helped setting up i Ukraine. Biden was severely stressed to do so by the prior Russians official announcements.

The day before Russian President Putin and several Russian Ambassadors had alarmed the US that it would equal a state of war, if Biden had signed the documents.

Int the below video on YouTube, Scott Ritter, former UN Weapons Inspector, gives his analysis of the recent geopolitical events during a conference call arranged by Schiller Institute.

Here’s an extract of Scott Ritter’s dire warning:

“Keir Starmer brought with him the documents, the target list. If Joe Biden had signed off on those documents, the target list, (or) part of that target list would have been executed that night.”

“British technicians are already in Ukraine loading target data on to the Storm Shadow missiles. These missiles right now are being used against targets in Luhansk and Donetsk (Ukraine).”

“NATO claims not to be a party to this conflict and yet when NATO provides weapon systems that can only strike targets when the targets have been processed by NATO-only entities. That's what people need to understand here. It's not just a matter of programming a Storm Shadow missile. There is an element in Europe part of NATO that absorbs American intelligence information, overlays it with American mapping information and turns it into the data necessary to strike a Target. That data is loaded Into the Storm Shadow. Because the Storm Shadow communicates with GPS, it doesn't do it on a commercial GPS signal - that's just one single channel (and) it can be jammed. It does it using the military channels. That's two channels. They're encrypted by the United States using American incryption technology, by Americans. Not by Ukrainians. Ukrainians are not cleared to operate this level of cryptograhic keying material. So when a Storm Shadow is fired against a target inside Russia it is literally being targeted by NATO. NATO is approving of the target and facilitating the the use of this weapon system against the Target. That means that NATO is a literal party to the conflict. And yet Kier Starmer wanted Joe Biden to sign off on this to say “allow us to use this American intelligence so that we can strike targets inside Ukraine using the Storm Shadow missile. This is an act of war and it's something that - had Keir Starmer signed off on would have been implemented that night. It's not something that's going to happen down the road it would have happened that night, Friday the 13th, and on Saturday the 14th we would all have been dead!

“We all almost died that week!”

- Scott Ritter

Scott Ritter has in an earlier video-interview stated that it only takes 72 minutes for an escalation of a nuclear all-out war disaster which would have mean that most of us would not have survived the day.

Help avoid a nuclear war disaster

Schiller Institute and Scott Ritter are both trying to raise awareness of the danger of a nuclear disaster:

Help and support Schiller Institute:https://schillerinstitute.com/

Help and support Scott Ritter:https://scottritter.com/operation-dawn/

Link to the Schiller Institute’s Danish organisation (for readers living in Denmark):https://schillerinstitut.dk/si/

You can also help by sharing this newsletter and spreading the word.

I have found this gentleman Lee Iovino who is exposing the ties between Israel and american BigTech like Intel and Microsoft. I urge you to watch his work and help spread the news:

Twitter/X-profilehttp://www.x.com/leeiovino

YouTube channel:https://www.youtube.com/@operationfreeamerica

You will have a much better understanding of how the Lebanese pager-attack was made possible after watching this!

I have followed the work of Brendon Lee O’Connell for some years now. His work is a fantastic eyeopener to Israels REAL relationship with the BigTech companies, the military-industrial complex and Silicon Valley. Plus how intimately related the leaders of Israel, Russia, USA and even Iran in reality are.

In short: American IT and military technology and know-how has been transferred to Israel over the last decades. And so has a lot of American tax-payers money! At the same time Israel and Russia have a very intimate relationship. Does that sound a bit odd in your ears? Well, it is!

This series of 10 videos have been produced over the last 2 months, but before the Lebanon pager-attack.

Not many know about the Talpiot Program or UNIT 8200!

If you have never heard about the Talpiot Program and UNIT8200 you will be in for quite a rough ride!!!

These are elite programs that trains young conscripts from a very young age, and many afterwards travels to Silicon Valley and other interesting places.

When Hezbollah bombed UNIT 8200 with a cellphone bomb in 1999

Could the pager attack, which has been expanded to a walkie-talkie and iPhone attack, constitute a retaliation from Israels elite unit, UNIT 8200?

Hezbollah managed to bomb the UNIT8200 headquarter in 1999, which is an event that the Israeli probably haven’t forgotten yet. Can you spot the similarities?

From Wikipedia “Unit 8200”:

Ronen Bergman says in a 2009 book that a Hezbollah bomb, disguised as a cell phone, was picked up by agents, and taken for investigation to Unit 8200's headquarters in February 1999. Basic safety protocols were neglected. The device never underwent the necessary x-ray procedures meant to ensure it was explosives-free. Inside the laboratory the cell phone exploded. Two Unit 8200 soldiers were severely injured, one losing a hand.

Enjoy Brendons video and help spread the word!

Disclaimer: I do not entirely agree with Brendon Lee O’Connell on all and everything. Actually I am currently blocked from his Patreon channel, so he is not so fund of me. But his knowledge of the zionists in Israel and the defense industry is matched by no-one, so let us help each other, and the World at large, and spread this knowledge!

Note that you can watch the videos directly from YouTube HERE!

You can find Brendon O’Connell’s Patreon channel HERE!

I have gone to Uppsala in Sweden to view Sweden's greatest book treasure, the so-called Silver Bible, or Codex Argenteus in Latin. It is a magnificent Bible made with silver and gold ink around 500-525 AD. in honor of the Ostrogothic emperor Theodoric, who had conquered all of Italy from the Romans.

The special thing about the Silver Bible is that it is written in Gothic and based on the semi-Gothic bishop Wulfila's translation of the 4 Gospels from Greek into Gothic. He must have made the translation between the year 348, when he had to go into exile due to the Roman persecution of Gothic Christians, and until his death in 383. The time is difficult to get closer than that.

The dating is important because it shows that the early Christians considered the 4 Gospels to be Jesus' core teaching, and that the 4 Gospels were therefore the Bible. We will come back to that, because I have a number of pieces of evidence to assert that it is true.

The early Christians did not have to missionary with the sword in one hand and the Bible in the other

From Jesus' death until the church synod in 393 AD. the message of Jesus’ teachings expanded throughout the known world. It spread like wildfire without the missionaries having to use weapons and force, as the Roman Church later did, after the Synod of Hippo in 393.

Today's historians call all the early Christian denominations Arianism, which is a huge misnomer. But it gives an understanding that there were earlier Christian congregations than the Catholic ones. Arian Christianity was already excommunicated as heretics at the Synod of Nicaea in 325. When the Catholic Church therefore boasts that it has fought heretics for over a millennium and a half, it is often Christians they have persecuted and killed. I wonder where in Jesus' message the Catholic Church found evidence for this? The Roman Church has had to lie and deceive in order to use Christianity to usurp wealth and power. And the church has killed right and left, even in Jesus' name.

Against this background, it is not surprising that we do not know much about the early Christian communities, because the Roman Catholic Church simply wiped them out, in the same way as the Ostrogoths were wiped out. Everything that was not Catholic was heretical and, according to the Romans, had to be destroyed. And the victors, as you know, write the history, which means that not many words are left about anyone else's interpretation of the truth other than the victor's own story.

Arian Christianity survived for a long time, despite the persecutions of the Romans and the Catholic Church

Although the Roman Catholic Church has done everything it could to hide the history of its persecution of other Christians, and burned all the non-Catholic writings it could get its hands on, a lot of Arian Bibles have appeared, in over a thousand years after the Romans began the persecution of the Arian Christians and other non-Catholic Christians.

The common understanding of the Bible says that "The oldest Bibles are Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus and Codex Alexandrinus. But this is simply not true. First, the dating is obviously wrong. Next, it is dishonest not to mention Codex Washington, Papyrus Codex (Papyrus 45), Codex Syraiacus, Garima Gospels, and Codex Vercellensis which are all temporally BEFORE the mentioned three Bibles.

It seems that the Roman Catholic Church is trying to embellish history so that the early Arian Bibles, which only consisted of the 4 Gospels, do not get the attention they should. But the truth about this deception is also getting out. Listed below are the many Bibles which only consist of 4 Gospels, and which both existed long before the synods in the fourth century and which were reproduced right up to the Middle Ages.

Early and later Bibles that only consist of the 4 Gospels:

* Codex Bobiensis (Note: only Matthew and Mark gospels!)

* Codex Palatinus

* Codex Vercellensis

* Codex Veronensis

* Codex Bezae

* Codex Corbeiensis primus

* Codex Corbeiensis secundus

* Codex Fossatensis (Insular Gospels)

* Codex Brixianus

* Codex Rehdigeranus

* The Würzburg Bible

* Codex Claromontanus (Valerianus)

* Codex Usserianus primus

* Codex Aureus Holmiensis

* Codex Curiensis (Fragmenta Curiensia)

* Codex Sangallensis

* Codex Usserianus secundus (Garland of Howth)

* Codex Sangermanensis secundus

* Codex Gatianum

* Liber Moliensis (Book of Mulling)

I've put the links in so you just have to click on the names above to verify what I'm saying is true: the Bible only consisted of 4 gospels until the Roman emperors tamed Christianity and made it a 'kingdom/state religion'. And this original form of Christianity lived on for many centuries, despite the Roman Catholic very deadly persecution of everything non-Catholic.

It is worrying that the Roman Catholic Church is even extra demanding in persecuting these early Christians. You may know the story of the Cathars, who were persecuted for hundreds of years and were last burned at the stake in the 14th century. The Cathars are an example of a Jesus-believing sect which was considered Arian Christianity by the Catholic Church.

It was actually this Arian dispute which in the fourth century caused the emperors to press the accelerator in terms of taming Christianity, so it is in the Roman Catholic nature to call all non-Catholics Arians. After the annihilation of the Cathars, the term heretics (which is derived from Cathars) is used instead, which just shows how screwed up the church's propaganda is.

Where's the beef? - and what about Paul?

The 'beef' in this problem, which a distorted Bible causes, is that the Catholic Church has used Jesus' message to shape a church that became a state religion, and a state religion, which could in turn be used as a tool of power towards the population.

The 4 gospels come as close to Jesus' message as we can probably get it today. The 4 apostles, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were all disciples and had walked with Jesus. Paul didn't have that.

But that does not necessarily make Paul inferior, because he has written so many passages in the Bible that Christians for almost two millennia have greatly appreciated.

But when he writes specific letters to specific congregations, the letters are intended to deliver a message in that context. What the Roman Catholic Church has done is to elevate it to the side of Jesus' words and actions. It is a cat's limb to fuse the state and the church together.

The Roman Catholic Church takes Paul to task in order to fuse church and state into a divine unity. This happens in the Bible canonized in the year 393. First come the 4 Gospels. Next, the Acts of the Apostles. And right after that comes Paul's 'Letter to the Romans'. In chapter 13, verses 1-7, Paul tells how to submit to authorities and authorities:

Being subject to authorities (Romans chapter 13, verses 1-7)

1 Everyone must submit to the authorities he has over him; for there is no authority except from God, and those that exist are appointed by God,

2 so he who stands up against the authorities stands against God's order; and those who stand against it will incur judgment upon themselves.

3 The rulers are not there to frighten those who do good, but those who do evil. If you want to be free from fearing the authorities, then do good; then you should get praise from it.

4 For it is God's servant for your benefit. But if you do evil, fear; for the authorities do not bear the sword for nothing; after all, it is God's servant who, as a punishment, lets wrath fall on the one who does evil.

5 Therefore it is necessary to submit, not only for the sake of anger, but also for the sake of conscience.

6 For the same reason you also answer dear; for those who take care of this very thing are God's servants.

7 Give everyone what you owe them: whoever you owe tax, tax; the one you owe customs duties; the one you are guilty of fear, fear; the one you owe honor to, honor.

BUT, Paul is writing to a specific congregation in Rome, which has the Roman emperor very close, and which must balance the concepts in order to survive as a congregation.

Paul did not write a new gospel! He has simply written a letter specifically to a congregation that was in a difficult situation. He did not write a doctrine of submission to every power, however just or unjust it might be.

But, as with everything, you can interpret a text loosely (as I am doing now). The fact is that Jesus' words and actions showed that one should not blindly submit to all authorities. He asks Simon Peter to hide the sword as the Romans want to arrest him, but he just shows with his actions how wrong decisions the authorities make, thereby depriving them of both ethical and moral authority. Even if in the end they get to carry out their desired action, and crucify him in a conspiracy with the Jews, history also showed that it was actions that went against the Romans that they crucified him (but only until they hijacked his message in the year 393 ).

The core of the problem is that Paul's letter to the Romans must not be placed next to Jesus' words and actions, as the Gospels describe them.

The investigations by Free Church pastor Jon Knudsen

A priest who has investigated these conditions for much longer than I have is Løkken Frikirke's Jon Knudsen. He has made a summary of his research into the origins of the Bible, which he shares at the link below (in Danish, but with various illustrations).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UWT7dhTIp93q3kioAdpkLWhXbXJ5ri2N/view

You can read (in Danish) in Jon's document how the Catholic Church tries to withhold information about the history of the Catholic Bible and its distorted relationship to the 4 Gospels.

Much of the information about the early Bibles that I share in this post comes from Jon's fantastic deep-digging into the history. Thanks to Jon for all that he so generously shares with the rest of us!

Aula Paolo - The snake Catholic Church laughing at us

Right next to the Vatican's St. Peter's Church is a large concert and theater hall that the Vatican has named after Paul.

The hall is shaped like a snake's head when you look from one end to the other. The main piece of art right behind the stage is a strange hodgepodge of lizard or alien-like creatures.

Why does the Catholic Church honor the Apostle Paul in this way?

Can you spot the toppling dominoes?

- Danish-donated F-16 aircraft cannot designate targets without at least one of the two Swedish-donated AWACS aircraft, which cannot operate without a NATO satellite system, which cannot operate without NATO personnel.

Western leaders are keeping up the sharp and western-fanatic rhetoric against Russia, ignoring the fact that Russia has the biggest nuclear-warhead arsenal in the World.

It seems that USA is pushing those EU-countries, who are also NATO-members, to upgrade their interest in the Russia-Ukraine war, jeopardizing them becoming legitimate goals for Russia.

Putin is not blowing air castles when he says that the (NATO) countries that participate in attacks on Russia will be an active part of the conflict. In an article by CNN World Putin is cited for the same statements he has given in above interview.

With close ties knitted to the donated military merchandise, making the operating of these weapons depending on non-Ukrainian NATO-personnel.

The developments raises an important question for Danes?

IS DENMARK NOW AT WAR WITH RUSSIA?

…and unfortunately the question is the same for all countries who eagerly helps in provoking a World War III.

When a human being in 2024 asks the question ‘who controls the World’ - and he or she wont rely on mainstream media to give the answer - it is obvious that the Vatican and the Rothschilds are both central to the conspiracy against the people of the World.

But who reigns highest in the hierachy of the dark powers? Ain’t that the real question: Is it the Zionist or is it the Jesuits?

Exactly that question is debated by two well-known alternative researchers Michael Collins Piper and Eric Jon Phelps in a radio show from 2006 hosted by Greg Szymanski (Liberty Radio).

I want to share this debate as these two gentlemen are some of the greatest capacities, and they have both documented their research in several books.

Readers of the Danish newsletter know that I am personally quite convinced that it is in fact the power families who rules the World. Theses bloodline families controls all factions that have a say in exercising power in the World today. This includes all religions, cults and sects of any substantial size. In that regard I think that both these fantastic researchers, during this debate, lend credence to this conviction of mine; But please judge for yourself.

Below is an image I created for use in a former article which has been adapted a bit:

What about the Zionists?

The Rothschild family was hired by the bloodline families back in the second half of the 18th century, when Mayer Amschel Rothschild became a court jew of Crown Prince Wilhelm of Hesse in 1769. When the latter became Wilhelm 9th, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel in 1785, the road was paved for the royal-elitists families of Europe to use the Rothschilds to control the World through the Rothschilds banking dynasty.

In my native country, the royal family sold Denmark to the Rothschilds in the socalled ‘state bankruptcy’ in 1813, after Denmarks allied war-general, Napoleon, was running out of luck in his wars against the European incumbent royalist elite. It took many years for Denmark to settle the score with the Rothschilds in subsequent loan agreements, but essentially Danmarks fate was handed over to the Rothschilds in 1813.

Could there be a connection between the state bankruptcy and the selling out to Rothschilds? It is definitely possible considering who became Wilhelms wife.

On 1 September 1764, William married his first cousin, Wilhelmina Caroline of Denmark and Norway (1747–1820), who was the second surviving daughter of Frederik 5th of Denmark and Norway. They married at Christiansborg Palace and resided for two decades mostly in Denmark.

It is interesting to read Danish history books and learn that no Rothschilds of any importance ever really resided in Denmark. But it is somehow ‘forgotten’ to let the Danes know, that the socalled ‘state bankruptcy’ was just a show to impose a silver tax on the Danes. The silver was later shifted out of the country through Rothschild family relations in the trading company.

No doubt that the Rothschild is in control of the money. But the real control is exercised by the bloodline families, who has been in control of the Rothschilds since 1769.

The Jesuits and the Swedish, Danish and German nobilities

One of the very clear examples of bloodline families retreating from public spotlight after the Age of Enlightenment, but still pulling the strings today, is the Swedish royal house.

The Swedish royal family belongs to the Bernadotte noble family. But when the Swedish royal house awards an order distinction to either their own family or foreign heads of state or royal families, they award an Order of the Seraphim, with which that person becomes a Knight of the Order of the Seraphim.

This Order of Seraphim has the Jesuit 'IHS' logo in the center of the medal/order. No one can or will explain why - it just is.

The order was initially instituted by the Swedish king Frederick 1st, who incidentally was also the Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel from 1730-1751 and thereby bloodrelated to the forementioned William 9th.

No doubt the Jesuits are working in the shadows of powerhouses in Europe and abroad, and have been doing so since the order was initiated shortly after the protestant revolution. It was in 1517 that Martin Luther allegedly put up the ninety-five theses on the church of Wittenberg, thereby starting the Reformation. The Jesuit was the military arm of the Catholic Church’s counter-reformation, which was their effort to counteract the Luther’s reformation.

The Jesuits have since moved on to become central in the Vatican’s exercising of power. The present pope, Francis, is a Jesuit.

I will soon find the time to send you another newsletter on the whole bloodline conspiracy. So don’t forget to sign up for the newsletter now, if you have not done it already.

Vatican assassins

I still haven’t read Eric Jon Phelps book on the Jesuits, but I intend to do so soon, as he is clearly one of the best researchers on the Jesuits.

In the meantime, please visit his homepage Vatican Assassins HERE!

And also, please do listen to the below, which is another interview of Eric Jon Phelps by Greg Szymanski. Here Eric Jon Phelps gives his account on therelation between the Vatican, jewry and muslim religions, 9/11 and many more controversial subjects.

Tribute to Frances Leader

Frances Leader is one of the great writers who, on top of informing about Eric Jon Phelps work, writes a lot of interesting articles on her Substack channel.

Read Frances Leader’s post on the same subject, which was what got me started on my own post. Go to her newsletter HERE!

She also inspired me to start my own Buy-me-a-coffe account, so if you like my work - and don’t feel like becoming a paid subscriber to my newsletters, you can always just support me by Buying me a coffee HERE!

I recently discovered that I forgot to publish this newsletter article when I wrote it back in the second half of 2024. Well, perhaps it is not a bad time to publish it now, as another field study has proven that Bluetooth MAC addresses are being emitted from the physical bodies of people who have been vaccinated against Covid-19 (and probably also in some cases from unvaccinated people).

People inocculated with Covid-19 shots could essentially have been (nano)chipped in the process

Back in late 2020 conspiracy theorists were quickly to claim that the Covid-19 vaccines would insert a computer chip inside the body of the injected person. However, this was not believed by many at the time and it was never documented.

But, even though no chips were injected through the vaccines, it has been claimed that the mRNA vaccines contained the microscopic building blocks that was able - under the right conditions - to form a self-assembled intracorporal nanonetwork, enabling intra-body-to-outside-world-communication.

A scientific and peer-reviewed study by physician Young Mi Lee from the Republic of Korea and professor Daniel Broudy from Japan, has confirmed that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contains nanotechnology that are showing self-assembly behaviour in a human-body-like culture. The study was released on July 18th 2024 on the portal of International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (link to study).

Dr. John Cambell makes a short video review of the study

In this newsletter you can watch a mirrored video from Dr. John Cambells YouTube channel from July 2024 that explains the main outline of this new scientific study. You used to be able to watch the original video HERE but it was of course coming too close to the truth, so it was taken down by YouTube!

The main content of the study can be summed up:

In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous — on the order of 3~4 x 106 per milliliter of the injectable — visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100 µm, or greater, of many different shapes.

There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them.

All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables, and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures.

As time progressed during incubation, simple one- and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions.

They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent, thin, flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains.

Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time.

Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.

Dr. Young Mi Lee, Jeju, Jejudo, 63098, Republic of Korea (South Korea)

Professor Daniel Broudy, Okinawa Christian University, Japan

The study even shows that electromagnetic radiation could enhance the process of self-assembling.

Where can I find the study?

Go to the landing page of the new study on the “International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research” and find the study HERE!

Also you can find the study in PDF-format HERE!

This study could (unfortunately) support my tests back in April 2023

Back on the 10th of April 2023 I did a test in a park near Copenhagen where I showed that inoculated people emitted bluetooth signals from within the body. I did several other test with the same results.

My tests were explained in the video “Do vaccinated people emit Bluetooth signals?”, where I also explained how people could do the test by themselves. Watch the video below:

IMPORTANT NOTE TO ABOVE VIDEO:I state in the video that if you do your own field study, you need to keep away for more than 100 meters from possible sources of interference. I have later found out the these Bluetooth emission can propogate more then 1000 meters. Please keep this in mind if are doing your own study.

Back then I asked the question: “Could it be true that the vaccinated part of the population was chipped in the process?”

As a qualified radio communication engineer, I had felt urged to carry out some field studies to investigate whether the Covid-19 vaccinated people actually radiates Bluetooth MAC addresses, just like it was shown in the BlueTRUTH video by COMUSAV. This video is a MUST-SEE!

You can find the BlueTRUTH video by COMUSAV below:

Graphene oxide in the vaccines

Graphene oxide is believed to be essential for the process of self-assembly of the nanoparticles. You can find more information on the subject of graphene oxide in the vials on Claire Edwards homepage.

La Quinta Columna have collected a lot of the science in this field, and it can be found HERE (choose 'english' in top menu of the landing page).

It still remains to be scientifically proven by peer-reviewed studies that the COVID-19 vaccines actually installs a full nanorouting intracorporal network in the body. However, with this recent reporting of scientific proof of self-assembly nanotechnolocy, I fear our worst nightmare might come true:(

The vaccines could have provided some of the essential components for a self-assembly intracorporal nanorouting network, that is able to communicate with the outside world using Bluetooth MAC adresses through a Bluetooth wireless protocol.

Flemming Blicher

Pseudonym “Mik Anderson” documents how all the technology for intracoporal nanorouting is already available

Under the pseudonym “Mik Anderson” a video surfaced some time ago, which gives an overview of all the technology, that is currently available to make it possible for the deployment of a self-assembly intracorporal nanonetwork. Se link below:

For further information on this ‘phenomenon’ please watch MD and PhD Ana Maria Mihalcea’s interview with Dr. Pedro Chavez of COMUSAV from july 2024.

Fast forward to December 2025: Yet more proof of Bluetooth MAC addresses - And a remedy!

As stated in the beginning of this newsletter I have just learned that I new scientific field study has been released. In this study they not only confirm the findings of Bluetooth MAC addresses in inoculated people, but also serves proof of a remedy.

I will discuss this field study in a newsletter soon to come. Dont forget to subscribe so you can have the newsletter send directly to your inbox when it is published!

Most people might not recognise his name, but most people certainly recognise the name of one of Sweden’s greatest bands after ABBA, namely Roxette. The band produced hit after hit in the 1980s and 1990s, and even featured with their hit It Must Have Been Love in the famous blockbuster movie Pretty Woman also featuring lead actors Julia Roberts and Richard Gere.

Christoffer Lundquist became a full band member after the band’s 80s and 90s heydays, and eventually played leadguitar on stage with the band’s original members Marie Fredriksson and Per Gessle.

Christoffer Lundquist is now stepping forward for truth and encouraging other artists to also step forward and be authentic to their art and their craft as artists.

He was recently interviewed by Michael Jaco and Ole Dammegard in a nearly two-hour interview.

Ole Dammegard is a researcher for truth and has been working to expose the World’s many lies for almost 40 years. His research has exposed the irregularities and similarities of events like the murders of John F. Kennedy, John Lennon and Olof Palme. Recently I interviewed Ole to get his help in exposing the fires of Notre Dame in Paris and the Stock Exchange Building in Copenhagen Denmark. Ole is such a well-known researcher that his last name has been turned into a verb. To ‘Dammegard something’ means to seek the true story behind the subject matter.

Michael Jaco is a former professional soldier from the US elite force The Navy SEALs and a whistleblower-host in his own podcasts and vlogs. He is currently promoting health and truth. Jaco has featured several interviews with Ole Dammegard over the past year or more. In the interview with Ole and Christoffer he shows how important it is to help whistleblowers like him to get the truth out in a peaceful, non-violent and loving way.

Hopefully Christoffer will soon be featuring on the Mark Devlin Show. Mark Devlin has done a lot of exposing the truth about the music and entertainment industry.

The interview featuring Lundquist, Dammegard and Jaco is found on Dammegards homepage Light on Conspiracies. I can highly recommend every truth-seeking individual to subscribe as a paying member to Dammegards extensive newsletter. You will be supporting someone who makes it possible for an artist like Christoffer to step forward, by inviting him to this session with Jaco.

Artists letting the truth out all over the World

Christoffer Lundquist is thankfully not the first artist to step forward. When ignoring the John Lennons and Princes of the past, artists like Van Morrison, Eric Clapton, Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) and Cat Stevens are among the few worldwide top names that up until now have helped to expose the dark agenda of the Globalist Elite.

Interestingly (and also tragically), another Swedish international artist Aviici (Tim Bergling) was reported to spread '“conspiracy theories” before dying a mysterious death in 2018 in Muscat, Oman. It must be considered near-to-impossible to consider oneself ‘awaken’ without understanding the depth of Aviici’s knowledge of the dark secrets of the Globalist Elite’s plans, when wathcing the official video of his hit single Wake Me Up.

In my home country, Denmark - a neighbouring country to Sweden - local names like Peter Lützen, Rasmus Nøhr, former Shubidua-member Bosse, Saszeline and the present members of the controversial band Danser med Drenge, have all stepped forward for truth during the last 4-5 years. They have not done so without experiencing push-back from the mainstream press. A few of them have even withdrawn from speaking out in public about their controversial views due to the pressure exercised against them. But most of them are still keeping up the fight, and some are even re-joining the fight after taking a break.

Peter Lützen and Rasmus Nøhr have even played concerts right after each other at an ‘awaken’ book launch in Copenhagen in March 2024, where 12 freedom authors presented their collective work after writing the book The Freethinkers (not yet published in English). To watch some of the live performances you kan go to the Facebook event HERE!

I am sure that what we see in Sweden and Denmark is going on all over the World.

What is particularly interesting, about Swedish-based Christoffer Lundquist of Roxette stepping forward, is the fact that he does so without having experienced much of a pushback from partners in the music industry, nor from the Globalist Elite. Ole Dammegard had to flee Sweden some years ago, so maybe times in Sweden (and elsewhere) have changed? Will Christoffers testimony help other artists in their own process of stepping forward for TRUTH? Let’s hope so!

Most artists can hardly spell “Frankfurt School” or “Tavistock Institute”

But even if times are indeed changing it is bound to take a lot of time and effort to wake people up with facts, if the ‘slogans of freedom’ are not supported by artists and other public figures helping to popularize the process of awakening to the truths of this World.

Lundquist’s and Dammegard’s accounts in this interview help explain how artists get enrolled in the Globalist Elite’s plan (Agenda 2030, New World Order, One World Government, The Great Reset). Artists are being used and abused by their own industry while the Globalists pull the strings of the other industry marionets.

As an avid researcher myself, I can attest how difficult it is to convey the message of concepts like The Frankfurt School, Fabian Society and Tavistock Institute, which are instrumental, institutional bodies for people to understand, if they want to understand how the entertainment industry has evolved into the evil creature of today. Hollywood being a central example of how Frankfurt School, Fabian Society and Tavistock assign media institutions with helping the Globalist Elite doing it’s mindcontrolling of the people of the Western World. Rolling Stones is arguably the best example of how to sell yourself to the devil. Watch the hit single Sympathy for the Devil from 1968 and judge for yourself. This is in the middle of the ‘Love Revolution’ of the Flower Power movement, which the Globalist Elite had to quelch before the war-protests became too overwhelming and subsequently could have seeped into mainstream politics (which didn’t really happen, for the same obscure Frankfurt/Fabian/Tavistock reasons).

However, try and mix the above mentions of Frankfurt, Fabian and Tavistock with rantings on World Economic Forum, 9/11, Kennedy-assasinations, Corona-humbug and you’ll get a very difficult cocktail to sell!

But artists are the ones who should be able to more easily see these structures of evil than normal blue and white collar workers. Therefore I urge you to please help distribute this piece of news from a Swedish whistleblower and even a well-established name in the music industry.

In my personal oppinion Christoffer Lundquist is hitting the nail when he postulates that the majority of succesful artists don’t know what they are participating in, before it is too late. It is obvious to all that Mick Jagger of Rolling Stones and U2’s Bono have ‘sold themselves to the devil’ long time ago. But do people really understand how difficult it is for the artists themselves to grasp what they are taking part in?

Did Beatles members John, Paul, George and Ringo actually create the quite satanic album cover for The Beatles Yesterday and Today album themselves, or was it a ‘clever’ Tavistock-inspired marketeering manager/photographer? Did they know what they were doing when participating in the photo shoot for the album cover?

Stadium Bands have all sold their souls to the Devil!?(!)

Depeche Mode is another best-selling Stadium Band that, just like Rolling Stones and U2, has been extremely popular for decades. Not many understand to which extent this electropop band has been used and abused since they made their breakthrough in the early 80s. Depeche Mode produced two 100% totally ‘awake’ albums namely A Broken Frame (1982) and Construction Time Again (1983). This was done subsequent to the hit album Speak & Spell (1981) featuring the bands all-time biggest hit Just Can’t Get Enough which literally set the standard for the Depeche Mode-electropop era, influencing everything in the synthpop/new wave music genre.

But, after their fourth album, Some Great Reward (1984) - an album mostly about worldly love - it appears as if the band was taken over by the dark forces. The title of their fifth album even openly screams this out loud: Black Celebration. The devil is in the detail and he is definitely wearing black! Depeche Mode did a perfect mock of The Rolling Stones song Paint it Black (published in 1966) and went ‘black’ themselves when Black Celebration was released in 1986.

Link to Depeche Mode discography on Wikipedia HERE!

Sheep or truth-teller?

Unfortunately it appears that Depeche Mode gave up on idealistically using their artistry craft and instead made a deal with the devil and continued making Music for the Masses, which is also incidentally the actual title of their sixth album.

I remember watching the bands songwriter Martin Gore in his quite ridiculous sheep costume when they visited Copenhagen in the 00s. He was my song-writing hero at that time and I could not suss out why he did not make an effort to look just a tad bit like the hero I wanted him to be. It never dawned to me how he could be trying to tell me and other ‘sheeps’ in Copenhagens main stadium arena - I include myself as a willing sheep at that point in time - telling us something about the real World we all were being held captured in. Alan Wilder, a newcomer to the group i 1983 also wrote two very ‘awake’ songs on their most ‘awake’ album Construction Time Again, namely Two Minute Warning and The Landscape is Changing. What happened to the succesful synth-pop group after this can only be accounted for by the group members themselves.

It all seems so stupidIt makes me want to give upBut why should I give upWhen it all seems so stupid?

Do you ever get the feeling that something can be doneTo eradicate these problems and make the people one?Do you ever get that feeling, something like a nagging itch?And all the while the doctors stitch and stitch and stitch and stitch and stitch

Lyrics from Shame by Depeche Mode

Lead singer Dave Gahan’s fall from grace is very telling of the top careers in the music industry. Drug control is instrumental for controlling bands like Depeche Mode, that could potentially make real Music for the Masses (pun intended as this was the album title of the second album after the band swallowed the ‘blue pill’.) Read about Gahan’s fall from grace in 1996 HERE! Note in particular how Gahan’s abuse of drugs started much earlier than 1996.

Who knows, maybe Martin Gore will be next to step forward? Or maybe even Dave Gahan!? Or maybe YOU? - if you’re a music artist with a heart for the future generations!

You will be joining the likes of Pat Stevens and Roger Waters of Pink Floyd. And now the courageous Christoffer Lundquist. Who knows, you might be joining all three on the next Pink Floyd The Wall-inspired protest album?

Share this great piece of news and help other artists to step forward for TRUTH!