Key Discussion Points:

* Governor Landry’s Reform Agenda: Governor Landry is calling for a legislative solution that holds both insurance companies and personal injury lawyers accountable. His plan aims to cut costs for drivers and restore fairness to the process.

* Commissioner Temple’s Pushback: Temple argues that insurers are already providing required information and operating at a loss in Louisiana. He warns that some of the proposed changes could hurt more than help.

* Insurance Industry Insight: Experts say Louisiana’s claim costs are significantly higher than neighboring states — largely because of our state’s legal climate. Some worry that litigation reform could be more effective than rate caps.

* What’s Next at the Capitol: With the legislative session kicking off Monday, all eyes are on Baton Rouge. Will lawmakers side with the governor, the commissioner, or carve out their own path?

Join the Conversation:

🎧 Listen Now: Apple Podcasts | Spotify

📬 Subscribe: joshguilloryshow.substack.com

📞 Call In: Join the discussion weekdays from 4–5 p.m. on NewsTalk 96.5 KPEL.

Stay informed, stay engaged — and don’t miss today’s debate on the future of insurance in Louisiana.

While Temple pushes for meaningful tort reform to bring insurance relief to Louisiana homeowners and drivers, Governor Landry’s team seems less eager to take on the trial lawyer lobby. Is this a clash of priorities — or politics?

We break down why Tim Temple’s bold stance could finally be what Louisiana needs to fix its broken insurance market, and why the Governor’s response raises more questions than answers.

✅ Why trial lawyers are being blamed for high insurance costs✅ The political tension between Temple and Landry✅ What real reform could mean for homeowners and drivers in Louisiana✅ And what this means for the future of conservative leadership in the state

Subscribe, share, and join the conversation on the fight to fix Louisiana’s insurance crisis.

So here's what Landry's pitching:

* Crack down on those constant legal ads that scream “HURT IN A WRECK?!” every 10 seconds.

* Stop insurance companies from passing their own advertising costs on to you.

* Make the “No Pay, No Play” rule even tougher (if you don’t have insurance, you can’t collect after a crash — even if it’s not your fault).

* And give more power to the Insurance Commissioner’s office.

Sounds like a game-changer, right?

💥 But hold up — not everyone’s buying it.Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple (you know, the guy whose job it is to actually fix insurance) isn’t thrilled. In fact, he's pretty steamed that Landry vetoed a separate insurance reform bill — one that had bipartisan support and was supposed to help drivers now. Temple says folks in Louisiana have been getting crushed by sky-high premiums for way too long, and he’s not seeing enough urgency from the Governor’s plan.

🔥 And here’s where it gets spicy: Landry clapped back, saying yeah, reform is necessary — but not if it just fattens insurance company profits. He pointed out that these companies raked in record profits in 2023, so why should they be crying poor while families across Louisiana are barely scraping by?

So we’ve got a tug-of-war here:

* Reform that might make trial lawyers sweat.

* Pushback that says it's not going nearly far enough.

* And a Governor trying to thread the needle between fixing a broken system and not giving the insurance industry a blank check.

🚗💸 Bottom line: Is this a serious solution to our insurance nightmare — or just a flashy press release with no real teeth?

Let’s break it down, take your calls, and see if you think Jeff Landry’s insurance plan is a step in the right direction… or just spinning its wheels.

The ruling reinstates presidential authority under the Alien Enemies Act but also requires that those targeted still get notice and a chance to challenge their deportation in court.

Supporters say this is a strong move for national security. Critics, including Justice Sotomayor, argue it risks skipping due process.

We dive into the legal, historical, and political angles — and what this could mean for immigration policy moving forward.

🎧 Tune in now!

While families in Louisiana depend on oil and gas jobs, and while severance taxes from that industry fund critical state services, some politicians and out-of-state interests are working overtime to cash in through lawsuits that could drive business out of Louisiana for good.

On today’s show, we break down:

* Why this lawsuit isn’t about justice — it’s about money and political power

* The economic consequences of attacking energy producers

* How these lawsuits risk raising prices, killing jobs, and weakening American energy independence

* The danger of rewriting history by punishing companies for decades-old activity that was legal at the time

* What this means for every parish and every worker who relies on the energy sector

📉 If you care about Louisiana jobs, our energy future, and the rule of law, you don’t want to miss this episode. The fight is bigger than Chevron — it’s about who controls Louisiana’s future.

🎧 Available now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.

📢 Subscribe, leave a review, and stand up for Louisiana.

Josh breaks down Gingrich’s claims that unelected judges are becoming the most dominant force in government, pushing a political agenda rather than interpreting the law. With the 2024 election looming large, we discuss what a Republican victory could mean for reining in judicial power, restoring the balance between the three branches of government, and pushing back on what many see as weaponized justice.

Tune in as Josh and Jamie unpack:

* Gingrich’s critique of judicial activism

* The constitutional roots of this growing tension

* What a second Trump term might look like for the federal courts

* Whether America is due for another “Reagan-style course correction”

Don’t miss this important conversation about power, the Constitution, and the future of American governance.

📲 Listen now on your favorite podcast platform and join the conversation!

We explore:

* The Rationale Behind 'Liberation Day': Understanding the need to counter decades of unfair trade practices and protect American industries.

* Impact on Domestic Manufacturing: How these tariffs aim to rejuvenate U.S. manufacturing and reduce reliance on foreign goods.

* Global Reactions: Analyzing responses from international partners and the potential for a recalibrated global trade landscape.

* Economic Implications: Discussing the anticipated benefits for American workers and the economy, alongside addressing concerns about inflation and trade tensions.

Join us as we unpack how President Trump's decisive actions are set to restore America's economic independence, bolster national security, and reaffirm the nation's commitment to fair trade.

The lawsuit, backed by the state of Louisiana and aimed at nearly 40 oil and gas companies, alleges environmental damage to coastal wetlands—but many are questioning the true motivations behind it. Could this legal action be more about politics and payouts than protection? And why is the state’s own position now being called into question? Who knows, maybe we are just “conditioned for failure”.

We break it all down:

* The economic fallout if the lawsuit moves forward

* Why oil and gas leaders are sounding the alarm

* The growing conflict between state and parish governments

* What this means for workers, families, and taxpayers in Louisiana

🎧 Tune in for a conversation that every Louisiana resident needs to hear—especially if you care about energy jobs, coastal protection, or government overreach.

📌 Topics covered:

* Louisiana constitutional amendments

* Off-cycle elections and voter turnout

* Government accountability and legislative priorities

🎧 Listen now to get the inside scoop on how your state really works—and why it sometimes feels like déjà vu at the ballot box.

#LouisianaPolitics #JoshGuilloryShow #ElectionFatigue #ConstitutionalAmendments #OffCycleElections #LAGov #ConservativeTalk #Acadiana

Was this move predictable? Let’s just say—we called it.

Tune in as we break down what this means for the GOP, how the Louisiana Congressional Map plays into it, and what could happen next on Capitol Hill.

🔊 Listen now to The Josh Guillory Show for smart, bold, and unapologetic commentary on the stories that matter.

violence restraining orders (DVROs) from possessing firearms. The decision, delivered

in an 8-1 opinion by Chief Justice Roberts, asserts that temporarily disarming

individuals deemed a credible threat to the safety of others is consistent with the

Second Amendment. This ruling, in the case U.S. v. Rahimi, has potential implications

for other gun-rights measures and ongoing legal cases, such as that involving Hunter

Biden.